/lit/ - Literature

How about you post actual nice girls?

Because it takes time to scroll down the sticky.

I don't know, this is my first year here, I just assumed it's always been slow as fuck

>>2775260
so damn ugly

>2012
>not reading lit from page 15 backwards
>ishygddtdotcostanza

>>2775260

Or follow your lead and post boys.

Why don't you use this catalog.neet.tv/lit
?

>>2775274
gay

>>2775276
troll

>>2775300
Keep believing that liking futas doesn't make you gay if it helps you sleep at night.

>>2775303
> futas

>>>/a/

All the good posters(me included) got sick of the terrible new users in 2012 and left. Now you kids can all be plebs together.

>>2775315
Rose is a boy, and even if she wasn't, she looks like a feminine boy.

That's what you're attracted to. Androgyny.

You're bi, you just haven't realized it yet

I've been here from 2010 and I can attest to that. The conversations tend to be a bit more fulfilling now, as the infamous gargantuan tripfag orgy has subsided

>>2775463
>Rose is a boy

source?

>>2775264
You can collapse it

a lot of people died

>>2775524

Quentin hung himself, right? Good. He was the worst tripfaggot this board has ever seen.

>>2775463

Not all bisexuals find androgyny appealing.

>>2775527
he was a brilliant mind.

>>2775532
That film is horrible.

>>2775547
What film is it? He's a really sexy man.

>>2775547

Yeah, it was very beautifully shot but didn't have much going for it in the way of narrative.

>>2775549

Hunger, by Steve Mcqueen (not the 60's actor). And yes, he's quite the looker.

>>2775556

>quite the looker

I mean Fassbender, of course. McQueen is beat as fuck

>>2775527
>>2775534
Nah, he made a video a few days ago.

He was one of the reasons I left /lit/ back in 2010 when it was first made. All the Ayn Rand shit. I didn't know his trip because I don't pay attention to trips but later learned he was the main shitposter of it.

hey sunhawk, what do you think will invigorate /lit/, more tripfags, or fewer? If we need more, I'll be happy to adopt a trip personality if it will make /lit/ a better place

>>2775556
>40 minutes of great cinematography showing, not having the dialogue telling, the harsh struggle they endure for their cause
>20 minute conversation between two characters in Northern Ireland accents
I "noped" and to this day that is the only film I have not finished.

>>2775705

I agree, for the most part. It's (almost) worth it for the cine, but perhaps not quite. Fassbender's performance isn't terrible either, but the film needed more backbone, to be sure.

>>2775711
I think Fassbender gave a great performance and that film put him on my radar, but McQueen really fucked up the spacing of what he wanted to include

>>2775729

It's his first feature-length, and he's coming from a background of gimmicky gallery-art stuff, so I think it can be forgiven. It had some beautiful moments, in any case, though not enough to save it as a whole.

I think he might have some promise as a director, we'll have to see what he does next.

sun-chan, u excited for this is how you lose her?

>>2775457
>says he left
>still here
>sounds legit
>dubs for you

>>2777556

Fuck me it's fast enough. Or you'd think visitors of a board about books would have other ways of passing time other than in here.

>>2775264
Indeed.

>>2775264

>not using http://catalog.neet.tv/lit/ and cherry-picking threads from all 16 pages