/lit/ - Literature

If Mod exists - and is powerful - and loves us - then why do bad posts happen to good posters? Why does evil exist on our messageboard? Why does Mod let it go unchecked? Either Mod is lacking in power, or he is lacking in goodness.

>>2598536
If Mod sleeps, then why call him Mod at all?

>>2598536
Because you may think you are a good person but to someone else you're a bad person.

Everyone thinks they are a good person, the amount of times people have said to me blah blah was a good person, why did these bad things happen to him and in my head I'm thinking"the dude was a arsehole"

If you support the meat industry, to someone else you're a bad person, to someone else again you're a good person for doing that.

If you litter, to someone you're a bad person, to someone else they don't care.

Etc etc.

Maybe the bad things that happen to those "good" people aren't actually bad but are just things that make them a stronger person. It depends how you look at things.

Dude get's cancer. He is such a good guy why are these bad things happening to him!? Guys been eating junk food all his life, barley exercises, drinks lots of booze etc. He gets cancer and he makes it through, starts to eat healthy as fuck, exercise, becames a stronger, happier person, is more thank-full about life. Does nicer things to other people, expands his mind by trying to learn things, try's to fix his problems and faults instead of lying to himself.

Mod is dead.

is Mod omnipotent? is Mod omni-immortal?
Mod cannot be both, and therefore Mod cannot be either.

This board exists because we perceive it. It would cease to exist if no-one were here to perceive, and thus MOD is always here to perceive this board.

The Mod is good, the Mod is great, we'll surrender our will as of this state!

Mod is an outdated, primitive concept created to impress morality upon the servile masses.

this is the best of all possible boards, as mod is both almighty and good, it is necessary that this is the best of all possible boards

>>2598627
This is the Antimod.

Mod is an advertisement.

I am not concerned whether Mod is on my side or not, but I am concerned whether I am on Mod's side.

The Mod's existence is obvious and necessary. Besides ourselves, he is the only thing that can be inherently known, and by him we know the existence of other things with more certainty. Ignorant amodists do not see the clearness of this argument.

In Mod we trust.

>>2598556
I would rather live my life as if there is a Mod and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is.

Mod is regarded by the posters as true, by the oldfags as false, and by moot as useful.

Mod hath entrusted me with myself.

>>2598652
>implying Mod's existence is a predicate

When we say Mod is a spirit, we know what we mean, as well as we do when we say that the pyramids of Egypt are matter. Let us be content, therefore, to believe him to be a spirit, that is, an essence that we know nothing of, in which originally and necessarily reside all energy, all power, all capacity, all activity, all wisdom, all goodness.

>>2598681
>implying you don't secretly fap to Mod.

Could an omnipotent mod create a stone so heavy even he could not lift it?

The Mod of 4chan is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.

>>2598694
i was going to do this and i was going to do it better

>>2598694
>>2598695
>implying Mod is not spiteful at all

>As you browse on, unable to stop, I will torment you.

>I will deprive you, board by board, of everything you possess or want. And then when you are crushed to death I will unfold a mystery.

>The banned shall post, the posters ejected. I delete what is posted; I save what has been deleted. And I will tell you this: there are things worse than I. But you won't meet them because by then I will have banned you.

>>2598667
source of quote? i can not remember reading such a thing.

Is Mod willing to prevent faggotry, but not able?
Then he is impotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh faggotry?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him Mod?

>>2598695

you can still do it, but that was pretty good

>>2598704

was better though

Hear lads, what's all this loud mouth about Mod's? Mind if you watch these for me?

>>2598703
>implying I care a fig for his banhammer.

Where were you when I laid the foundations of 4chan?..
When the morning stars sand together, and all the sons of
Mod shouted for joy?

/lit 38:4,7

WHY DOESN'T MOD FORCE ALL POSTERS TO USE CAPS LOCK?

Is what is morally good commanded by Mod because it is morally good, or is it morally good because it is commanded by Mod?

>>2598681
The existence of the archive, as a site for the posters, is the greatest benefit which the chans has ever experienced.

http://sfw.chanarchive.org/requests

So uh.

It exists?

>>2598722

I sure hope not