[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 154 KB, 960x600, 1334552667066.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2567111 No.2567111 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.2567114

bad list

how is /pol/ so pleb when they clearly understand the menace of zionism

>> No.2567119

if you cut out the whole bottom half you might be good to go. /pol/ is out of its element on this one, honestly.

>> No.2567124

> philosophy
> gulliver's travels
Huh

>> No.2567134

Why the Tractatus instead of Philosophical Investigations?

>> No.2567139

>>2567111
Needs more Lenin.

>> No.2567140

>austrians
>idiot tier

this is clearly not a fucking pol list

>> No.2567141

>>2567140
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/res/2639143#2640164

libertards must be asleep.

>> No.2567143
File: 203 KB, 1604x880, 1334551896503.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2567143

That was only by one guy, here's the other more pleb version.

>> No.2567146

>No Schmitt
>No Strauss

Well color me surprised.

>> No.2567149

>>2567143
This is like something I would have made when I was 17. THE REVOLUTIONARY'S READING LIST.. YOU WILL UNDERSTAND ALL RELIGIONS AND THE PLEB SHEEP WHO FOLLOW THEM AND ALL SORTS OF REALPOLITIK STRETCHING BACK TO MACHIAVELLI AND PLATO.

/pol/ needs to chill out.

>> No.2567153

>>2567149
This. The fuck are they doing. It's a fucking horrid list to boot (Mein Kampf and Aclockwork Orange for philosophy? Really?).

>> No.2567155
File: 155 KB, 960x784, actually_this_is_a_pretty_lame_list.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2567155

Honestly, not much comes to mind. Books on any given subject are so common there isn't really anything outstanding

>> No.2567167

>>2567111
>>2567143
>no Society of the Spectacle

>> No.2567180

>>2567141
>he doesn't know how to link

>> No.2567211

>>2567111
>Crackpot Lyndon LaRouche on reading list for economics
>Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Keynes, von Mises on shit-tier
>"List-maker doesn't want people to understand economics" is most favorable presumption

>> No.2567225

Well that's embarrassing for them.

>> No.2567235

I really like to read Lyndon LaRouche, I may not agree with him on every single thing, or rather, sometimes I feel I don't disagree with him on anything at all, I just don't particulary embrace some of his stances and beliefs on various matters.

>> No.2567254

>>2567211
>Karl Marx
>Implying its not shit tier

>> No.2567260

>>2567235
Oh look, a German who's easily swayed by the rhetoric of an authority figure.

>> No.2567263
File: 30 KB, 250x364, Everything-You-Know-Is-Wrong-250x364.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2567263

lol

/pol/ has no reading list

/pol/ just decry racial purity while watching porn of black men fucking white women, and scream "muh guns, muh rights, tha JOOZ

I'm really not exaggerating either

>> No.2567266

>>2567211
They might as well include Ezra Pound.

>> No.2567289

>All the mainstream, well known economists in idiot tier

Stay edgy /pol/, stay edgy.

>> No.2567292

Also, I don't know much on anything apart from Econ, so my list will consist of nothing but that.

-Capital volume 1 and II
-Man, Economy and State
-Meltdown
-General theory of employment, interest and money
-Keynes, return of the master
-Theory on money and credit
-Free to choose
-Economic facts and fallacies
-Markets and minorities
-Imperialism
-An abridged version of the wealth of nations (original was tl;dr)

>> No.2567298

>>2567263
This is true. /pol/ is nothing but antisemitism and racism hiding behind a thin veneer of "surely they must be trolling"

>> No.2567319

Except for Plato and Kant, all of those philosphical works are either obscure or entry level shit