/lit/ - Literature

>>24015111
Deleuze. For Mario, desire is desire *for* something, for the psychoanalytic object, Mummy Peach, always inaccessible, always deferred to the next castle, hidden behind the parental prohibition of Daddy Bowser. Thus the Oedipal quest of Mario, captured between the side-scrolling strata, territorialised subject of the Mushroom Kingdom. But Wario, zooming, like a wild nomad, kart-borne, along his line of flight, deterritorialises the Oedipal son Mario: 'continually dismantling the organism, causing asignifying particles or pure intensities to pass or circulate,' he takes the glyphic M, deterritorialising it from its phonetic function, and spins it into the realm of pure shape, pure line; it circulates in the zigzag of his whiskers. 'The two great molar aggregates of the East and West are perpetually being undermined by a molecular segmentation causing a zigzag crack, making it difficult for them to keep their own segments in line.' In Wario the steppe horde leader reappears, borne on his war marchine kart, making raids into the North American psyche as the Asiatic hordes made raids into proto-Europe, crossing the trans-Pacific trade networks via shipping containers filled with WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgames! still bearing a trace of radiation from the worldwar.

>>24015219
>deleuzian mario
fuck. i thought this board was dead. is waluigi laruellian? badiouan?

>>24015219
Bump for effortpost, based.

>>24015111
You can probably make an argument for him being an Objectivist.

>>24015219
This board is so in love with beautiful nonsense

>>24016866
Are you a woman? No offence

>>24015111
Epicureanism
Desadeism
Egoist anarchism

>>24017054
Three strikes you're out

>>24015111
>Money
Capitalism
>Women
Aristippian hedonism
>Power
Machiavellianism

>>24016866
Shut the fuck up faggot

Really? None of you retards said hedonism yet?

>>24017054
Epicurus very famously denied himself the majority of the common indulgences, eating only meal with occasional cheese, because he felt that minimizing the sources of your pleasure is most conducive to maximizing your experienced pleasure. So, no. De Sade was not particularly mad about power or money and did not care for what in women made them distinct from men. His principal vice was freedom, which he believed could only be had by one willing to transgress all of society's bounds. As for egoist anarchism, I don't bother to learn anything about any ideology that shows up on reddit's front page. Wario here strikes me as a slave ultimately, blindly accepting that he should want what he is told he should want.

>>24017165
Hedonism is not a school of philosophy. Though I hear that if you go to Italy you can pay to learn how to drink wine and eat chocolate.

>>24017185
>Hedonism is not a school of philosophy
You are a baboon tier retard

>>24017184
>I make sure to not know things that re**it ever talked about
You spend way to much time worrying about website's coolness factor. You're a hipster, though right about the others.

Stirner was a nice guy who wrote a book that shrewdly brought into the light the facts about power. You take what you can.

>>24017185
It absolutely is. There were many other schools of thought contemporaneous with Aristippus, but those writings have been lost, as everyone seemed to agreed that best Epicureanism was best.

>>24017165
>>24017121