[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 112 KB, 500x457, 1718952959701106.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23512523 No.23512523 [Reply] [Original]

>Oh yeah read philosopher X but you wont truly understand him unless you read the complete works of philosopher A B C and D the war letters of philosopher F and the speeches of philosopher G

>> No.23512529

>>23512523
>waaah why do I have to READ ALL THIS
A lot of newfrens exhibit non white behaviour

>> No.23512530

>>23512523
low quality thread

>> No.23512535

>>23512523
start with the Achaeans

>> No.23512540

>>23512523
Surely you've heard of Ea-Nasir

>> No.23512961

>>23512523
some retards actually believe that old yarn haha

>> No.23513228

>>23512523
Start with the Sumerians.

>> No.23513831

>>23512523
Start with the Neolithic clay tablet receipts

>> No.23513928

>>23512523
This usually happens when someone wants to real someone like Kant but has no background. It's possible, but not going to be pretty. I think the problem is mostly with the way Western philosophy is taught: as a series of conflicts and developments upon successive philosophers' works.

>> No.23513939

>>23512523
You wont understand philosophy until you've read either none of them or all of them.

>> No.23514245

>>23512523
People who say this are psueds who are unable to summarize their interpretation of any philosophers works. Try it next time, it's very funny.

>> No.23514338

>>23512529
Dude, shut the fuck up. Whites don't read. This isn't 1850.