/lit/ - Literature

>>23310058
What? thing in itself doesn't even exist. Read Kant.

>>23310073
>Read Kant.
so, I can be wrong but it depends on you.

>>23310058
yea but only as an abstract concept. It is the hindu Neti Neti

>>23310207
if you can know one thing exists for certain is it the only thing that exists for certain

>>23310212
I wouldn't know unless I knew other things for certain too

>>23310230
so does Kant think ground is real idgi

>>23310240
>ground
?

>>23310251
if, for example, the laws of the universe are violated, is there a thing in itself

>>23310058
No cap this nigga got no puss cuz he speaks like dat - like bruh? Ennglish nigga? fr no one reading dat understan it. on god. Fukn Kant, German ass nigga. Make no sense ass nigga. Aristotle mak'n more sense than this dude.

>>23310263
if the laws of nature are violated there is no us as we know it, and therefore no us to conceive the thing in itself, no us, no subject in which the concept of the thing in itself (and all it is is a concept) could exist (as a concept).

>>23310301
Why are you talking like this?

I found a thing-in-itself on the side of the road once. I keep it in an old shoe box under my bed.

>>23310474
careful it's HIGHLY volatile

I saw a thing-in-itself eating at Texas Roadhouse the other day