/lit/ - Literature

Thank god, now we have chicks with dicks I can enjoy.

>>23287516
Can't you cite some of his writing that lead you to this conclusion?

>>23287522
Holy shit
/thread

>>23287526
in Archetypes, his chapter on identity in alchemic contexts (i think its in the middle somewhere), he talks about a prophetic dream in which western men in the future start re-arranging their sex across a 3D spectrum, he says this is a good thing because it leads to ascension beyond the "infernal plane" which is a 2D loop for some reason. he says this was revealed to him by a "lightbringer" and he was fully lucid during the dream.
don't even get me started on his essay on hermetic personalities

*invents neoliberalism*

>>23287540
freemasons would unironically tell jung to stop screaming the quiet part out loud on a megaphone, i thought peope were more wary of unironic luciferianism back then.

>>23287540
>dude alchemical allegory means literal sex change!!!
I don't think Jung is for you.

>>23287556
>fallen angels cursing humanity with amoralism and descending (inverted ascendance) into nothingness? totally not satanism bro, you just don't le get it!

>>23287565
I've never understood people who do this. Because Jung discusses fallen angels that makes him satanic? You are discussing fallen angels, you brought it up, are you satanic? Fallen angels are satanic in what context? Fallen angels are almost entire apocryphal in Abrahamic traditions, you know.

>>23287577
Here's another thing I don't understand.
1. The Bible has 66 books
2. Therefore the Bible is satanic and evil
Like I don't know what to do with that or how much I should worry.

>>23287596
I think >>>/x/ might be more what you're looking for sir

>>23287556
>>dude alchemical allegory means literal sex change!!!
The entire corpus of 'western esotericism' is just a jewish psy-op. The concept of a 'divine androgyne' (which ties into the concept of original sin) is tranny shit. Jung is a useless dumbass.

>>23287540
That's unfortunate.

>>23287577
>just because he talks about the lightbringer rebelling against the heavens by enslaving men to his formless energy hes a satanist? you just don't understand the broader symbolism!
>not a freemason or devil worshipper btw

>>23287540
>he talks about a prophetic dream in which western men in the future start re-arranging their sex across a 3D spectrum
No fucking way, I know he predicted Hitler's rise to power using dreams, but that's maddening, if true, of course.

>>23287731
Silence, you filthy satanist!

>>23287522
>Thank god, now we have chicks with dicks I can enjoy.