[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 26 KB, 590x420, JK-rowling-5257602.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23164165 No.23164165 [Reply] [Original]

>Hmm
>I need a name for this character who is a shitty writer...
>I got it!

>> No.23164198

>>23164165
What was the name?

>> No.23164204

>>23164198
Malibrus Poorwrite

>> No.23164207

>>23164198
She already has it (JK Rowling)

>> No.23164208

>>23164165
The names were genius

>> No.23164209

>>23164207
YWNBAW

>> No.23164213

>>23164209
cope. trans rights are human rights

>> No.23164218

>>23164213
jew rights are human rights

>> No.23164220

>>23164198
rita skeeter

>> No.23164229

>>23164213
A good tranny is a dead tranny

>> No.23164232

>>23164213
>trans
>human
?

>> No.23164239

>>23164220
I don't get it.

>> No.23164252

>>23164213
What rights do trans people not have yet that everyone else has?

>> No.23164257

Just Kidding Rowling

>> No.23164266

>>23164252
the right to be treated according to your gender

>> No.23164271

>>23164266
why do you want to be defined by your gender? i thought the push was against gender norms.

>> No.23164272

>>23164266
Nobody has a right to be treated according to their gender. Women in the past and now were treated according to sex, same with men.

>> No.23164280

>>23164204
Underrated.

>> No.23164284

>>23164266
gay

>> No.23164301

>>23164271
>i thought the push was against gender norms.
gender norms aren't negative in themselves. I only dislike them when they become oppressive, like conscription or the cult of domesticity. but there's nothing inherently wrong with separating people into men and women.

>> No.23164306

>>23164266
If genitals and breasts don't affirm gender, then why is gender affirmed by removing them?

>> No.23164316

>>23164272
>Nobody has a right to be treated according to their gender
so I can just call treat men like women and vice versa?

>> No.23164325

>>23164306
>why is gender affirmed by removing them?
it isn't. trans men don't need to remove their breasts in order to be considered men.

>> No.23164337
File: 94 KB, 1024x768, IMG_9511.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23164337

>>23164266

>> No.23164344

>>23164337
jesus wouldn't be transphobic if he actually existed

>> No.23164355
File: 1.99 MB, 600x424, 1660500624155277.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23164355

>>23164266
Gender is a term made up by a jew doctor literally named money. The only thing that is real is sex which there are 2 of. YWNBAW.

>> No.23164359
File: 26 KB, 424x224, 1681618390359228.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23164359

>> No.23164361
File: 130 KB, 1170x1153, 1708022554290474.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23164361

>>23164344

>> No.23164370

>>23164325
>concedes half of my point
Your victory is a pyrrhic one, and the point you make isn't even true.

>> No.23164381

>>23164209
Cool.
Rowling's still a shit writer.

>> No.23164386

>>23164266
Okay, sir.

>> No.23164388

>>23164361
there would be significantly less autogynephiles around if gender norms got loosed. you help to create the problems you complain about.

>> No.23164393

>>23164370
>Your victory is a pyrrhic one
it really isn't, you just seem to not understand why people criticize cisnormativity. it has nothing to do with believing in 90128302 genders.

>> No.23164403

>>23164355
>The only thing that is real is sex which there are 2 of
so biological sex cannot be expressed, and there are no social expectations regarding it?

>> No.23166148

>>23164388
Your weak, brittle, estrogenic wrists would be shattered if I grabbed them.