[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 257 KB, 677x845, DerMeister.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23147665 No.23147665 [Reply] [Original]

The thing in itself, which because it being what it really is is logically prior to our conceptualization of it can also not be called an unknowable chaos since this would be a subreptive application of the categories of thought to that which we want to know as it is prior to that application. Consequently, it is also not certain whether there IS OR IS NOT a sun, heat, rock, etc., which exists externally. And according to Kant it will remain uncertain for the foreseeable future because we do not know at this point in history have the mental capacity to determine whether our subjective categories of thought have an exactly corresponding objective correlate which would allow us to legitimately apply our categories of thought to it since the thing in itself would then also be a subject (an ego, an I, soul, mind) in a larger sense with same categories of thought as ours: a microcosm to microcosm relation, more simply, as above, so below. This being the case, ironically, the best way to understanding objective reality would to understanding our own selves, the famous injunction: Know Thyself.

>> No.23147854

>>23147665
Bernardo Kastrup has settled that uncertainty

>> No.23148603

>>23147665
Does being too smart bring you full circle and make you retarded? Bro the sun is real, please get a job.

>> No.23149379

>>23147665
>Consequently, it is also not certain whether there IS OR IS NOT a sun, heat, rock, etc., which exists externally.
Solipsism. Also, this is no a deduction from the previous statement.
>And according to Kant it will remain uncertain for the foreseeable future
>the foreseeable future
Noumena are outside the realm of time.
>This being the case, ironically, the best way to understanding objective reality would to understanding our own selves, the famous injunction.
Yet another case of zero deduction from the previous statement.

tl;dr OP is a pretentious midwit as opposed to the honest midwit, >>23148603

>> No.23149385

>>23147665
The dou you can speak is not The Dou.

>> No.23150646
File: 204 KB, 1125x855, NotForMidwits.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23150646

>>23149379

>> No.23150659

>>23150646
yes, that is why K. isn't for you. Get a job.

>> No.23150685

>>23150659
it was referring to you

>> No.23150701

>>23150685
," ze said limply

>> No.23150914

bimp

>> No.23150924

>>23147665
>>23150914
you already got intellectually demolished, little guy. Now I understand why you only quotespam Kant like a good little scribe.

>> No.23150934

>>23150924
>intellectually demolished
pure cope.

>> No.23150944

>>23150934
," ze sputtered finally

>> No.23151084

bumk