/lit/ - Literature

make sense the next time you post.
and remove the tripcode, tripcodes are for jerks.

>>2306557

YOU OBVIOUSLY LACK INTUITION.

fuck off tripcunt.

>>2306553

Fuck off asshole.

>>2306558
No sir I have intuition out the ass and then some.

>>2306565

THEN HOW ARE YOU NOT ABLE TO DISCERN THE TOPIC OF THIS THREAD?

/x/- /lit/ WITH CONTENT**

/tv/- REPETITION

**I should explain. The content is shitty, yes, but our creative content on /lit/ is put to shame by them. They openly encourage creativity, whereas we either feel contempt or jealousy and attempt to crush it.

/b/ - "CUTUP POETRY".

/r9k/ - "FREE VERSE & FLASH FICTION".

>>2306625
Nobody on here has any creative talent at all, it's never going to happen.

>>2306625
>They openly encourage creativity, whereas we either feel contempt or jealousy and attempt to crush it.

Matthew 3:12

/lit/ - homoanal transexualism

/fa/ - "MODERNIST EXPRESSIONISM".

1. >prosetry
It's called 'prosody,' but you should just call it 'prose' because 'prosody' is actually all about metre.

2.What does this thread thread even mean? Why are the kids on /mu/ prosaic, while those on /tv/ 'magical realist'

3. What do you actually mean by intuition (here:>>2306558)? Are you referring to some sort of instaneous/direct perception of something, non contingent on reasoning? Or, the more philosophical usage, the first empirical contact with a new phenomenon?

I'm interested to see whether you've got something cogent to respond to these queries, what you've provided so far in your tripcareer has often made little sense.

>>2306802
>It's called 'prosody,' but you should just call it 'prose' because 'prosody' is actually all about metre.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prose_poetry

>2.What does this thread thread even mean? Why are the kids on /mu/ prosaic, while those on /tv/ 'magical realist'

YOU OBVIOUSLY LACK INTUITION.

THE PREMISE OF THIS THREAD IS SPECIFIED IN THE "'SUBJECT' FIELD".

>3. What do you actually mean by intuition

WOW, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS INTUITION?

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/INTUITION

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuition_(psychology)

>>2306809
>point 1 conceded

>point 2 and 3
You have made a thread attributing certain literary genres to certain boards, with little reasoning behind your choices. your response to complaints along these lines, was to decry the lack of 'intuition' in your critics. I thought that your conception of communication was quite selfish in this case; you expect people to 'intuite' your ideas, to pick the damn things out of some sort of zeitgeist. To confirm this uncharitable treatment of your audience, I asked you to define 'intuition;' by linking me to a dictionary entry, you confirmed my suspicions that indeed you meant the standard denotation for the word.

So, my conclusion is that we probably should be on the same drugs to understand the reasoning behind your shitty trolls and specious new age thinking. Fuck you...

>>2306842

I WAS NOT AWARE OF "OTHER 'DENOTATIONS'" FOR THE WORD "INTUITION".

IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS THE FACULTY OF INTUITION, OR HAVE ONLY A VAGUE NOTION OF WHAT IT IS, DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT IS A TERM WITH "RELATIVE MEANING".

>>2306853
Well, as I demonstrated in my post, I discovered that philosophers in epitemology use it to describe a certain sort of empirical knowledge experience in a manner that significantly diverges from its denotation, its standard dictionary definition. I suppose you could have likewise used it in the manner of jargon from another more obscure field and likewise, have diverged considerably from its normal meaning...

I guess only attention-whoring faggots can post in this thread?

>>2306860
I guess I hope that the sort of Jack Russell yappy little dog criticism you got going on there isn't casting any aspersions on my name, you smarmy cunt

>>2306858

THERE IS ONLY ONE DEFINITION FOR THE WORD "INTUITION", WHICH IS THE COGNITIVE FACULTY WHICH NAMES; INTUITION.

"INTUITION" MEANS "SOMETHING ELSE" ONLY WHEN SPECIFIED.

>>2306865
This is coming from the fool that would deprecate formal logic. You know nothing about the philosophy of language and meaning, so sit and shut your ignorant mouth

/a/ - Concious Consumerism
They know anime is unoriginal, repetitive and so on, but watch it anway.

>>2306553
/lit/ - "Buttsurdism"

>>2306865

you were actually posting a little less boringly than usual itt but i guess the urge to be dull could not be denied

>>2306866
> the fool that would deprecate formal logic.

I HAVE NEVER "DEPRECATED" "FORMAL LOGIC".

MAYBE FROM YOUR LACK OF INTUITION AND CONSEQUENT INABILITY TO COMPREHEND THE CONCEPT OF WHAT INTUITION IS, YOU HAVE CONFUSED YOURSELF AND ASSUMED THAT I "DEPRECATE" OR "DISREGARD" LOGIC, BECAUSE I HAVE A MORE DEVELOPED INTUITION THAN YOU.

LOGIC AND INTUITION ARE NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. JUST AS HEARING AND SIGHT ARE NOT.

>You know nothing about the philosophy of language and meaning

THOSE ARE VAGUE RELATIVE TERMS. I DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU EXACTLY MEAN WITH THAT.

>shut your ignorant mouth

I AM NOT TALKING, I AM TYPING.

>>2306879
ohboyherewego.jpg
shit thread, ACTIVATE!

>>2306802
>GRR *working* Processing data: Intuition: Request Definition: "instantaneous perception of UNDEFINED object", "First empirical contact with new UNDEFINED phenomenon"
Try to explain intuition to a robot! Might aswell explain charity to a jew or the law to a nigger!

I expect you to post more here OP, it's such a circlejerk.
Your posts are gibberish but any true intellectual is intrigued by gibberish and will seek to understand it.