[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 336 KB, 1276x1600, Detail-Roman-copy-portrait-bust-Aristotle-Greek.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22440582 No.22440582 [Reply] [Original]

Aristotle vs Heidegger

Who right? Who wrong? Can we conjoin them?

>> No.22440590
File: 1.89 MB, 1450x2200, Plato.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22440590

>>22440582
>Who right?
Plato

>> No.22440761

>>22440590

Umm sorry sweetie that's gonna be a no

>> No.22441779

>>22440582
If you like both of them and want some middle ground synthesis maybe try the realist phenomenologists like Scheler, Ingarden, Hildebrand, Stein. Or try Nikolai Hartmann's critical ontology. I don't really know these guys as well as I do Aristotle or Heidegger though. But maybe it's also relevant to study early Husserl, and even go back a step, to Brentano, Twardowski, and Meinong. And this is crazy but even Frege and Russell and Moore are kind of doing that realist phenomenology thing, analytic philosophy after them (Wittgenstein, the positivists, the OLP people) kind of betrayed them afterward. When people call them "platonists" it's a sign of their Brentano heritage. I mean Frege studied about Brentano, and Meinong directly influenced Russell, so yeah.

>> No.22441842

>>22441779

Thank you

>> No.22441979
File: 691 KB, 1054x1167, 731_143947.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22441979

>>22440590
Stay broke