/lit/ - Literature

>>22395102
I hate yaoi

>>22395219
pft

>>22395102
It's not hard. Go to archivesofourown. They genuinely schlurp that schlop by the bucket. It's all about daring to degrade yourself is all. Furry artists complain about it all the time. Money or your soul basically.

>>22396647
You think you can't write porn for women that also qualifies as artistically worthwhile?

I always thought it to be interesting how conventional male and female sexual fantasies seem to form a cohesive whole, originating from opposite polarities but ending up meeting in the middle nevertheless.

>>22395102
Where would I go to publish such a thing?

>>22396700
Can you elaborate on that? What do you mean?

>>22396826
Men want to be the billionaire CEO fucking his hot secretary in the ass on his office desk, women want to be the secretary on the desk getting fucked in the ass by the hot billionaire CEO.

>>22396974
Write a book with your thesis

>>22396652
Men always think women like this flowery description about how you will make love to them on a sunday morn and become one together for now and forever. Meanwhile they always read about a hot guy "pushing his hot member into her warm and wet maidenhood, being made to yield to his every whim".

>>22397068
The impression I got was that it depends on their mood. Sometimes it's this, sometimes it's that, just like men crave different things at different times. Not to say that there's no general preference among women towards the kind of sex you described, because there definitely is.

>>22396974
I feel like a lot of men's fantasies are a bit different.

>>22396974
You sound like you're 12.

>>22397068
>ALWAYS
No.

>>22395102
Because hedonism leads to suffering.
Just sit and breathe.

>>22395102
good luck anon

>>22395102
I might be able to, anytime I give into writing sappy goo the femanons seem to respond well. But it is not really anything I am interested in writing, just do it for the odd write thread, or at least used to back when we still had write threads worth a damn,

I'm not gay. I don't want to write about glistening abs and plump man lips and hairy forearms.

>>22395102
Anon it's /lit/ nobody here can write for shit.

>>22395102
Honestly I have a hard time tolerating any smut, but usually I prefer it when it's written by (sane) women. Man-written smut reads like some kind of car repair manual, and the language is coarse and vulgar.
>>22398655
I haven't written in years but I bet I could write well.
>b-b-but you're wrong!
Probably, but we live to defy the odds, don't we?

>>22398710
>Probably, but we live to defy the odds, don't we?
Forget where you are?

>>22398731
Many people here have already defied the odds (their parents high expectations of them).

>>22398753
Pretty sure they are a tiny minority on /lit/ unless the expectations of the parents of the bulk of /lit/ was SID.

I used to write erotica featuring me and my ex as the main characters. She said if it was good we could act it out. She would tell me she masturbated to it and then we would act it out. Is this good enough to consider a silly pen name career in KDP porn.

>>22395102
men only want one thing, it's kind of funny

>>22398775
And what is that one thing?

t. man who would not mind some direction in life.

>>22398764
WHAT THE FUCK

>>22398775
>>22398780
Cunny ToT

>>22399204
>WHAT THE FUCK
He had girlfriend, something you have sex with. Its really NOT that big of a deal dude.

>>22398764
Probably.

>>22395102
>literary pornography
No such thing

>>22395102
in order to learn how to write sex credibly for my book writing, I practiced on what were essentially naughty "penthouse letters" until I was comfortable as a writer with that form.

>>22397559
>You sound like you're 12.
that's the age bracket, that this thin fantasy appeals to, age wise.

>>22398655
>Anon it's /lit/ nobody here can write for shit.
speak for yourself

Can /lit/ incels even write sex?

>>22402001
>Can /lit/ incels even write sex?
not an incel

>>22395102
I am a man of virtue and character. I would never write erotica just to make money off of normie women. I only write what I am truly passionate about. Like giantess erotica.

>>22402036

Are you saying something like a man who can speak to the sexuality of women would become an instant millionaire if he just published a book? By gawd! That seems like something that few on /lit/ would know or understand. Some would. A few would know, but fail to understand, and some of those who understand perfectly wouldn't quite seem to know. And yet, there are some who both know and understand who just haven't worked out how.

>>22402791
>what too much dialogues on socratic thinking do to a nigga
you're like... a cringe mfer frfr.

>>22402845
Socratic dialogue deez.