[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 69 KB, 680x698, 1685392804451.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22090380 No.22090380 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.22090385

>>22090380
English is not Latin. stop applying Latin grammar terms to English.

>> No.22090386

>>22090385
The subjunctive exist in English too. You have the mind of a nigger.

>> No.22090387

>>22090380
Sounds like English a person of colour would speak

>> No.22090389
File: 19 KB, 710x683, 1683432556547315.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22090389

>sea
>soit
>seja
>sia
>sit
>sei
>be
>να είναι

>> No.22090390

>>22090386
No, it doesn't. there are ways to express, in English, statements that are equivalent to Latin statements written in the subjunctive. This does not mean that English has a special "subjunctive mood."

>> No.22090398

>>22090385
>>22090390
It is imperative to the formal text that conditionals and hypotheticals be expressed in the subjunctive mood.

>> No.22090400

Wait, redditors really didn't know English has a subjunctive? Can any redditors explain to me why they didn't know that?

>> No.22090404
File: 32 KB, 549x350, tumblr_nsstdxfbjr1trx9e2o1_640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22090404

>>22090390
Incorrect.

>> No.22090408

>>22090398
No, it is imperative to use the future tense or a modal verb.

>> No.22090414

>>22090408
>future tense
English doesn't have a future tense.