/lit/ - Literature

Tits or GTFO

>>22015728
Did you write it before 1930? If the answer is no then I will not read it.

>>22015728
you look like my mom, are you perhaps 1/8 black

>>22015728
She used to be my type. I would rawdog as many girls like this as I could when I was 21-26. The type of girls to let you hit it raw unquestionably.

>>22015728
Thousand cock stare

>>22015747
can I date your mom?

>>22015728
Still better than R Tardner.

>>22015728
very cute baby djirl, veeery cute :P
i kiss you :* MUAAARH
i kiss ur feet too ;* ;* ;)
pleas open cloth and vegana so i kiss vegana as well :) :) :*
my penus is very nice very strong baby djirl i promise u will like ;)

>>22015783
Lord, give me the sexual confidence of an indian man commenting on women's profile pictures on facebook

>>22015783
I did not give you permission to record my thoughts when I see a 19 year old woman buying groceries (I am 52)

>>22015728
Listen here little baby. You're gonna get a lot of hurtful and degrading comments, but that ain't what I'm about. Let me just say, you are perfect the way you are. You hear me sugar? PERFECT. Don't ever change. You deserve anything and everything you want. Stay safe for me, baby girl.
>mfw thinking of you hurting

>>22015728
OH MY VISHNU SHE HAS LEWDS ON INSTAGRAM
OOOOHHHHHHHH

>just me and a cute girl alone in semi private public place
>she gets up and leaves after a long time sitting in a chair
>mfw it's sniffing time

>>22015794
That was beautiful

>>22015783
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiEC6pzq8GI
oh my vishnu dis baby gjerl turn my penus into the shiva penus

>>22015807
>be me
>live in shitty dormitory style apartment building
>shared kitchen, bathroom and washroom
>have seniority among the tenants and am spokesperson for them with our landlord
>thereby have great influence in which applicants get to move in and who doesn't (landlord doesn't give a fuck, and I pretend to him that I speak for all residents (I don't))
>primary decision process (secret) for what women among the applicants I accept is a combination of a) attractiveness, b) likelihood of leaving used panties in the shared washroom
You gotta avoid the conscientious women, the very best are the ones who are very forgetful and lazy at practical matters - not only because they are more likely to leave their used panties out, but because they are more likely to change them more rarely as well, ensuring a richer bouquet.

>>22015728
Women owe me sex

>>22015828
You are my hero, I just wish I knew you in real life so I could pay you a fee for socks access

>>22015840
we were having a nice and healthy thread and this psycho had to come, way to ruin everything, retard

>>22015840
retard blastard bloody
you can't just say it like that. Have some style

>>22015728
What is the book about?

>>22015728
If she was laying down I'd have thought it was a picture of a dead body.

>>22015938
Penis in vagene

>>22015728
I like the cute phallic imagery on your cover, anon. Nice touch.

>>22015803
Those books aren't going to sell themselves. There has to be a hook somewhere.

>>22015728
A friend has warned me against posting on /lit/. I should have listened.

>There are a few reasons why my book is not sellable. Firstly, the protagonist is never named, nor is she ever described physically. In fact, most of the characters in the story are not named; instead, they go by emblematic pseudonyms. There goes my ability to market my book off character art and fanfiction! Secondly, it is a challenging read. The language is abstruse and ontological, and the themes are heavily symbolic. I got a Dr in literature to beta-read the book, and he said that my use of vocabulary shook him. I could never tell if that was a good or bad thing.

>I never queried the manuscript simply because it was too experimental in nature. The average reader is not looking to delve into the depths of their soul and come back feeling disjointed. The average reader is not willing to decipher complex literary figures of speech. Heck, the average reader probably detests the idea of drugs and voyeurism!

>>22015977
In case it's you, like, what did you expect? What are people gonna talk about? Whether we would read or not a book we know nothing about?

>>22015986
didn't expect such hostility from one of the more civilized boards

I've even lightened my skin so you'd like me more.

This is awful. If you paid even a little bit of attention in a very low level intro to creative writing lecture you wouldn't write like this. None of it is good. There is not even a discernable trace of talent.

>"That was amazing. Tell him it was amazing, my internal voice knells. "
>"He turns his head to me, and a soft smile appears."
>"I turn onto my side, making my body appear svelte and beguiling."

Every sentence starts with "I" statements like you're a fucking teenager fanfic writer. "I cannot.." "His body is..." "He has a.." "I cannot.." "I envision..." "I turn..." "I trace..."

>>22015728
SOUND THE ALARUM WE GOT A FOCKIN OCTAROON IN HERE

>>22015982
>There goes my ability to market my book off character art and fanfiction
This bitch doesn't understand fan art is rule 35's retarded cousin

>>22016007
how do I delete the photo?

This woman sounds like she took psychedelics a couple times and now thinks herself enlightened. I've been to a burn before. You people bore me.

>>22016007
She should play Carmen, she has that Julia Migenes gypsy slut duskiness.

>>22016015
Stop reverse psychology false flag doxxing this poor lady.

>>22016007
This is not the Tolkien thread.

>>22016009
>hitting me in my chest cavity
>i'm glad you enjoyed it
>my body svelte his body perennial
I want to embrace this writer so much, amorously

>>22016009
This is almost good. Theres a funny incongruity between the lavish descriptions inside the womans head and the terse reality, which communicates well the anxiety inherent in interactions with the opposite sex. That's relatable. I mean, I wouldn't read it, but I think theres a lot of people who would that exist.

But yeah, way too many I's. Makes it hard to get through, technically.

>>22015828
>not only because they are more likely to leave their used panties out, but because they are more likely to change them more rarely as well, ensuring a richer bouquet.
Such a vile, raunchy thread. Good job OP

>>22016038
>>hitting me in my chest cavity
ahahahahhaha
>The language is abstruse and ontological, and the themes are heavily symbolic. I got a Dr in literature to beta-read the book, and he said that my use of vocabulary shook him.
no wonder her Dr in literature was so shooken by the abstruse vocabularical language. Who wouldn't be?

>>22016057
>But yeah, way too many I's. Makes it hard to get through, technically.
Which veda or sutta is this?

lmfao are you kidding me with this shit?

obviously you have no experience writing professionally, but have you even read a book before? what are these sentences???

>>22015728
POST EM OR LEAVE

>>22015728
post feet first

>>22015828
Have you succeeded?

>>22016009
>my internal voice knells
Is she dying? Either she used this word incorrectly, or I'm misunderstanding the meaning of "knell"

Weren't you on reddit asking to speak to Africans?

>>22016451
why would she do that if she's a white south african? Is she short of slave miners?

>>22015809
Newfag, lurk more and seize posting anything for at least 2 years.

>>22016101
It's not excellent, but it's not as bad as some of the prose I've seen on here. Still, any time I writer says they're too good for publishers or too smart for their readers, I know they're simply not practiced. She's trying, though, and I wish more writers on here would swallow their pride and go for it.

>>22016009
There seems to be a strong stream of critisism that praises along the lines of "effortless read." The grey haired childhood dreams of the older generations have manifested.

If you're abke to turn off a love for lyricism and exploration of language, and just look at books are "your" distraction, then this sort of thing will make you oink with glee. Saying that, though, I am so horny that I got hard looking at her pic. Being horny has to he the most useless and perpetually unfulfilled emotional state.

lol this answers every single question I had about this

>>22016644
>Newfag, lurk more and seize posting anything for at least 2 years.
Retard, you mean "cease".

muuua *kiss emoji*X3
baby I am kiss you on boobie
and pusy *tongue out emoji* :P

That's all I can say at this moment.

Why are cis women like this?

>>22017086
No. Seize the means of posting for at least 2 years. If you can hold them you'll be accepted as an oldfag.

>>22017130
Don't be mean, they're doing their best

>>22016009
Unironically, just needs editing. I can nearly guarantee that the author at best did 1-2 run throughs to check for obvious errors, but did not do any detailed rereadings or analysis.

Editing is god, and when first churned out most works are similar to this (if having maybe less utilization of what an undergrad student would think 'complex' and 'deep' vocabulary is). Edit your fucking works, rip it apart, kill your words, kill your plot, kill your characters. Achieve success.

CEO mindset.

>>22017154
>they're doing their best
Not with whatever that abomination of a blouse is they're not.

>>22017156
don't worry, they beta ran it with a "Dr of literature"

>>22017164
She has a certain style in her instagram, we call that hippie chic, 70's revival. It's fine if you're rich, and she's a white southafrican so she probably is.

>>22017182
I feel profoundly alienated from the average 'writer' or 'writing community' if such a thing exists if this is the character of such people.

Is it an ego thing on their part?

>131 pages
lol

>4 of the 5 goodreads reviews are from shill accounts with no pfp and exactly 1-2 reviews

Here's the sauciest photo I could find on her Instagram (at least, without making an account & all that).

>>22017449
Is that her daughter?

>>22015760
How do you get them to speak to you?

>>22015728
If we just kept beating you whores regularly and kept you illiterate we would not have to deal with this shit today and hurt your feelings

>>22017182
How did she have a "Dr" if she can't handle criticism? Her book is literally a shadow!

>>22017154
>Hibari tranny is back
:3 missed you

>>22015728

>>22017182
>my book is not sellable because the protagonist is nameless
Wut?
Damn this really shows the kind of literate background the bitch has. She hasn't read anything without a named protagonist.

>>22015763
Actually it looks like a mild case of strabismus.

>>22015742
yes

>>22015828
cultured

>>22015828
>male restroom
>stench of defecation hangs in the air
>putrid, nauseating

>female restroom
>stench of defecation hangs in the air
>immediatete diamond-hardness erection

>>22015728
Its always the hazel eyed whites that are the fairy fuckers. I would know, I am one of them. I love the Faerie Queene.

>>22015993
/lit/ attacks ‘the new guy’ pretty aggressively from what I’ve seen. As long as you don’t shill spam then after a while you get established and the very least tolerated. Textbook autism.

>>22015993
If by "civilised" you mean obsessed with leftist policial correctness, lmao, not only you are wrong, you are also retarded.
>>22019033
Gatekeeping is both necessary and good for online communities to be fun. The moment you start letting newfags in and spoonfeeding everything to them, the fun is over. If you want wholesome moments and feeling good about yourself, go to plebbit.

>>22016101
what's actually wrong with this? I thought it was fine.

>>22016957
kind of losing me with this one

>>22017182
definitely influenced by terence mckenna which to me is interesting enough. If she's actually from /lit/ and this isn't a shitpost roast me thread then I'm kind of interested.

>>22016957
I could save her (by licking her vagina for hours on end).

>>22015794
kek

>>22015728
Cover art is good

>>22019154
It's like a 12 year old girl's journal entry that is only missing "LIKE TOTALLY". It suddenly converts into "WHAT I DID" journaling.
tl;dr: She should have kept it to herself.

>>22015993
Gate keeping is important, furthermore, did you want people to just kiss your ass or did you value honesty? You can find plenty of "yes man" types on social media / reddit, go there.

no
also, not you

psychadelics don't make books interesting
they don't make interesting books
and they don't make you interesting

>>22019539
did you sincerely think that was her?
maybe you're the one who should be gatekept

>>22019569
>did you sincerely think that was her?
You made the mistake of thinking I care about the individual. I don't know who they are, or who wrote it. I'm giving my feedback, of what I read, in to a void.
>NO U
You and the rest of the illiterates should leave. I know that would leave the entire site with a population of about 90-total, but at least the quality would go up.

Imagine all the trouble Dostoevsky went through to get his books published, all the torture, debt, alcoholism, writing hundreds of pages by hand, then look at this.

Any sort of dignity or pride that can be had for having a book published has ben shat on mercilessly for the past decades by countless millions. Makes me sad, and makes me laugh.

Holy shit, all the incels in this thread are going OOOGA BOOGA ME WANT SEX mode for this 6,5 out of 10 used up. Fucking compose yourselves, Jesusss.

>>22017449
Goddamn! that body yowza yowza vavoom vavoom!
I honestly thought she might be fat but, boy, I'd love to have a go at her. mmmm hmmm!
Her face isn't very pretty though.