/lit/ - Literature

It's not a conspiracy bro. No one ever talks about THX 1138, and Star Wars is bigger than Narnia.
meds pronto

>>21973479
What is objectionable about it, OP?

>>21973479
Maybe it's as bad as all the rest of Lewis' books and just got forgotten?

>>21973492
It exposes the connection between transhumanism and Satanism, and it shows how the Oxford and Cambridge elites and the Fabian socialists (such as Bertrand Russell and HG Wells for example) were demonic.

>>21973495
interesting how you ignore the post that debunks your schizo nonsense
>>21973484

>>21973495
That's an interesting claim, old bean. Would you care to help me solve a paradox while you're at it? If you have a set that contains all sets that do NOT contain themselves, does it contain itself?

https://youtu.be/7kJytiN4f8s

>>21973497
But That Hideous Strength predicts how the world is today with so much accuracy it's incredible.

https://youtu.be/oUqE0J0aUFM

That's because Christcucksshould be banned from writing. You people believe that the only important book has already bedn wriiten, why do you faggots even keep on writing then?

>>21973479
> It is as if
> It's almost like

>>21973944
>>21973956
https://youtu.be/XZnZozLB6rg

>>21973944
https://youtu.be/x6wUqoJXKHs

>>21973995
>vaporwave aesthetic from 2015

Can this shit get any larpier

>>21973813
What does it predict? Smartphones? The internet? Climate change? What?

>>21973479
this book is dangerously based but it's overshadowed by the inconceivable basedness of Perelandra

>>21974121
>>21973495
>>21973500

>>21974225
Okay but what does it predict though?

>>21974243
Nothing. Idiot chuds are running their mouths as usual.

>>21974017
Where's your argument?

>>21974250
https://youtu.be/h-12i4mIBco

>>21974292
My argument is that christtardian philosophy attracts tradlarpers, therefore it can't be correct. I win by an argumentum ad cringium

>>21974560
That's a logical fallacy, and also, Jay Dyer isn't a larper. He takes Orthodoxy very seriously. He might goof around and makes joke sometimes, but when he is discussing serious topics he knows what he is talking about very well, and he is supported by many Orthodox priests.

>>21974598
Kek more retarded christtard babbling, sure your schizophrenic cult leader is a "serious" "expert"

>>21974598
Is that book a good starting point and do you have any online lectures/interviews/conversations you're recommend?

>>21974607
>pic-related
Your team.

>>21974947
Well he covers a lot of different topics but here is a good analysis of how pop culture and media is full of demonic propaganda.
https://youtu.be/0SbFzvTKTzM

>>21974947
>>21975064
also here is this video where he covers CS Lewis's Space trilogy
https://www.youtube.com/live/UU-Y1M4xNoo?feature=share

>>21975064
Thanks, anon. I'll check him out. Did you ever read Jeffrey Burton Russel's series on the history of how radical evil has been personified through the visige of the devil?

>>21975119
No I haven't read that. But that reminds me of baphomet and how it basically represents the whole worldview of erasing boundaries and blurring everything together. (part man and part beast, both male and female organs, hands pointing both up and down, etc.) That is basically the Luciferian Antichrist philosophy summed up in one picture.

It's surprisingly accurate. AI and demons; hordes of foreigners (Welsh, as Lewis probably couldn't have envisaged tens of millions of Pakistanis being shipped in) brought in to terrorise the locals; middle class moral nullity; universities as vectors of corruption; purposeful denigration of Christianity, etc.
Add white genocide, Pakistani rape gangs, and genetic modification through bullshit vaccines and it would be 100%.

>>21975794
literally this desu

>>21975794
https://youtu.be/h-12i4mIBco

bump

>>21975794
>if I replace these things that didn't happen with these things that did and then add all these things it didn't predict, then it accurately predicted the future!
Wow, amazing. Absolutely amazing. AI and demons especially hits hard. Fucking demons, am I right?

>>21976959
Yes. >>21973500
>>21973500
>>21973500