[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 1.13 MB, 2400x2977, Arthur Schopenhauer by Johann Schafer, 1859.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21774783 No.21774783 [Reply] [Original]

who's the most readable philosopher?

>> No.21774794

>>21774783
Not this guy

>> No.21774797

Nietzsche

>> No.21774806

>>21774783
Kant

>> No.21774809

>>21774783
you can't read?

>> No.21774817

>>21774783
the ones who wrote down their thoughts

>> No.21774820

>>21774783
Me :)

>> No.21774888

>>21774783
Plato, Nietzsche, Descartes, Francis Bacon, Berkeley, Hume, Hobbes, Leibniz....

>> No.21774902

>>21774888
also William James. Most anglos write clearly, Copenhauer only has a reputation for it because he was writing in the german tradition where clear writing was actually an original idea.

>> No.21774942

>>21774783
any that wrote in German

>> No.21774972

>>21774888
From experience (of seeing people around me) half of these are still a bit tough for beginners to philosophical reading.

I suspect some of the contemporary philosophers, particularly some of the applied ethicist are the most readable

>> No.21775039

>>21774783
What do you mean by "readable"? Anything is readable

>> No.21775097

>>21774809
>>21774817
>>21775039
wow you are so smart

>> No.21775102

>>21775097
I'm not, but I'm not sure what you mean by "readable". You mean easy stuff?

>> No.21775107
File: 65 KB, 710x296, definition.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21775107

>>21775102
ESLs must die

>> No.21775113

>>21775107
kek such a gay ass language

>> No.21775685

>>21774783
Basically anyone but Kant

>> No.21775757

Basically anyone from the Renaissance and the early modern period (best period of philosophy)

>> No.21775952

American authors write the most clearly, they're like the direct opposite of the French, it's impossible to misunderstand them

>> No.21776002

>>21774783
plato or aristotle really. maybe seneca/cicero since they are really good writers.

>> No.21776006

>>21775952
? i read montaigne and he was as clear as a mountain stream(pun not intended). you mean the post modern commie ones like foucault? descartes wasn't too hard either

>> No.21777747

>>21776006
>you mean the post modern commie ones like foucault?
Yep. French prose went to total shit in the 20th century

>> No.21777777

>>21774783
Most of the ancients are easy reads.

>>21777747
Absolutely not, and the three or four memes that Americans have heard of are not representative. Foucault is also quite clear, he's just trash.

>> No.21777782

>>21777777
Witnessed + waste of digits

>> No.21777899

>>21777777
>Absolutely not
Every 20th century frenchman I've read just writes like shit
Granted I think this is a product of modern universities more than a French specific problem

>> No.21777981

>>21777777
>777777
holy shit

>> No.21778010
File: 43 KB, 351x440, 5 star post.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21778010

>>21777777
nice

>> No.21778092

>>21777777
>frogs redeemed

>> No.21778100

Schopenhauer deliberately wrote in an understandable prose cause he was butthurt at hegels obscurantism.
I think Nietzsche wrote in an easy to understand way, the one thing he kept from his schop studies.

The greeks usually give it to you straight as well.

>> No.21778101

>>21777777
>Ancients are easy reads
>Foucault is shit
Holy based and checked.

>> No.21778110

>>21774783
Heidegger

:^)

>> No.21778129

>>21777777
Holy