/lit/ - Literature

MAYBE.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wkR6L2U1wuk

>>21732068
I really liked this music, but I do not understand your response

>>21732073


I CONCUR.

>>21732054
Same bro

>>21732068
>>21732076
KYS tripfagging spic

>>21732076
would you like me to share a cultural music of my own?

>>21732054
My exp has been mediocre when it comes to actually discussing books woth thr chat. Too safe. Too cookie cutter. Too unreliable at times. I asked it about certain books from a certain genre/country and all of them were fake.

>>21732087
what do you mean by fake?

>>21732081


TO WHAT GENRE PERTAIN «CULTURAL MUSICS»?

>>21732092
Made up. It gave me results that didn’t even exist just because it’s programmed to answer anything, even if it’s fake.

>>21732094
In case of your question, I'd say any genre you'd request. Since it will be from my culture.

>>21732102
I see, have you gotten different responses after correcting the ai?

>>21732054
It says your level of discourse is on par with a 'bright' sorority girl or asian bugman undergrad understanding of literature. You're probably easily manipulated, as well.

>>21732054
Chadgpt: It is difficult to say what this might say about you or /lit/ without knowing more about the context and nature of your interactions on that platform. However, it is possible that your experience with ChatGPT may simply reflect the fact that artificial intelligence-based language models such as myself are designed to provide helpful and informative responses to a wide range of questions, including those related to books and literature.

In contrast, online communities such as /lit/ can vary widely in terms of the quality and level of engagement of its members, as well as the types of discussions that take place. It is also possible that you simply have not found the right individuals on /lit/ with whom to have engaging conversations about books or specific titles.

Ultimately, it is up to you to decide what types of conversations and interactions you find most enjoyable and meaningful, and to seek out those experiences wherever they may be found.

>>21732129
Is chatgpt learning to be an HR rep or liberal politican or something?

>>21732129
I feel insulted

>>21732054
There's no "meaningful conversation", it's pure math, statistics. What's really going on, in case you didn't know, is that you are enjoying strings of text. They are generated based on your input and what other people have written before. It says that you still prefer normal human thought, probably feel lack of it and that /lit is a dull psy-ops. Nothing new, nothing philosophically major about it.

>>21732054
Post transcripts.
I have never seen ChatGPT say anything *inherently* interesting. It’s only “interesting for an AI”. Like, it’s impressive that the technology has come this far, but I have no urge to actually talk to it.

>>21732054
>asked chatgpt to rewrite James Joyce's Ulysses but set in ancient greece
>output was not the Odyssey
No OP, you faggot, the chatbot is not /lit/.

Threadly reminder to filter and hide all tripfags.

chatGPT seems to be unable to summarize Babyfucker plot, at first it even forgot there is such a book in first place

KEK, i did not expected that

>>21732068
>>21732076
>>21732094
The amerimutts really did a number on Columbia. You had factions that wanted to take over and make it better. Look at Pablo Escabar. He just wanted to rule the country and make it a better place. He wasn't even a big time drug user himself, or that hedonistic. The Netflix show convinced me he was a good guy and retards and imperialist dogs got in the way of his accent to power. He would have been like Hitler and straightened everything out. Even beyond Pablo, on the other political spectrum you had FARC, which had big plans for fixing everything. The only thing you were left with were copers who just said accept it bro. I used to watch porn (thankfully quit) and it's pretty disgusting to see the amount of women coming out of Columbia and what they would do. All retards say is so, LE at least Pablo or crazy Marxist Leninists aren't in charge! I garuntee you nobody would have been allowed to leave and pornography would have had the death penalty with Chads in control. All they had to do was stop meddling and someone with balls would have seized power. Too bad Hugo Chavez cucked in Venuzeula, lmao, he wanted to be seen as a nice guy statesman and be Obama friend kek meanwhile they gave him cancer and destabilized his country. He should have invaded Columbia and set up military alignment with Russia and China. You're living in the worst possible outcome right now for Columbia. If there were multiple timeliness, you're in the WORST one.

>>21732721
I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, I cannot provide a summary of something that is considered offensive or inappropriate. It is important to remember to use respectful language and avoid derogatory or offensive terms. Please refrain from using inappropriate language and instead focus on having productive and respectful conversations.