/lit/ - Literature

>OP got tired of posting Twitter screencap threads
>now he's posting reddit screencap threads

>>21501552
>a writer who I know has been criticized in the past for writing in this style in the past so I was guess I was hoping he might have grown past it
Holy shit, do people even read what they write?

>>21501552
>The most obvious and readily apparent feminine physiology is used to denote womanhood
>Reeeeeee!
It's exactly the same as a woman author noting (as they always do) a man's broad shoulders or stubble. Could women possibly be more obvious about their inward fears and insecurities that they are somehow inferior?

>>21502126
>all the hoes be like
Imagine the bulge

>>21502097
In the past they used to, but now we have grown past this need we had in the past.

For the good novelist, and indeed the good reader, who reads esthetically, no part of a novel is unnecessary. I've had this exact conversation with a woman, over a Martin Amis passage.
Imagine this halfwit reaction upon discovering poetry...

>>21502288
So basically a lot of beauty in this world was inspired by horniness?

>>21501552
I haven't squared yet how people can be repressive like this about the media they consume, while at the same time turning around and enjoying porn and whatever ridiculous 'fetish' behaviour they get up to in private.

>>21503048
I think it makes sense, if you think of it in terms of the repression of the shadow that has no outlet. In the secure confines of sacred marriage, a man and his wife can get up to some extremely spicy shit, with the luxury of the most thrillingly dangerous, potent orgasm imaginable, that of impregnation. In that structure, too, the wife is meant to follow a strong male priest-of-the-household. Lacking these structures, both sexes fill the void of purpose and pleasure with counterfeit artifices of both, the purpose being to fight for a hollow purity, and the pleasures being impotent contracepted sex with people you can't really trust, or inherently homosexual self-pleasure using one's hand and degenerate, aggressive porn.

>>21502126
Those aren't just factual descriptions, though, some of them read as practically drooling.

>>21503249
What 'facts' are you looking for? Talk about drooling.

>>21503384
You know what I mean. Mere physical descriptions of the character's body, as opposed to those that strongly imply the narrator's opinion on it.

>>21503393
Tender? Generous? Admirable?

Does an implied opinion convey no meaning?
Would women who are threatened by admirable breasts not also admire them?
I say they must in order to be intimidated.

Good women authors write horny shit too.

>>21501570
Tsk tsk

>>21503417
The question is whether the horny is tonally appropriate in that book, in that context.

>>21501552
>HONK HONK HUMINA HUMINA HUMINA AWOOOGA AWOOOGAA *motorboat noises* *dog panting noises*

>>21501552
LOOOOOOOOOOL
My wife fucking hates it when I fondle her tits all the time.
What else are you for, darling? I ask. Then she grabs my cock way too hard and squeezes it.
Feeling her tits in my hand is better than her hand on my cock.
They just don't fucking get it.

>>21503419
romance written by the modern man

>>21501552
>there are no other sexually charged moments
lol, they think mentioning a character has "breasts" is sexual.

look everyone, a sexual image! The character has b***sts!

>>21503524
Liking hyena girls is just good taste.

>Just then, a woman entered the room. She had big full lips in that way hot chicks have, without looking negroidic or weird like she has lip fillers. She had long, lush hair that was kind of brown kind of blonde, you know what I mean, somewhere in the middle. She smiled and her eyes did that thing hot girls' eyes do when they smile. She was thick with great hips and an hourglass figure, but not fat, it was more like just by looking at her you could tell when she sits down all her ass and thigh fat takes a second to readjust, imagine her sitting down on your lap like that, hoo-wee! She had on some tight jeans that made it look like her thick ass and thighs were barely contained in them, but not in that overly tight way where it kills all the jiggle and bounce either, you could still see some jiggle in there. She had huge boobs, which you could tell were not saggy at all, except just a little bit in that "big heavy boobs" way, but still perky also. This was the kind of woman who has often considered getting a reduction, they were that big. She was wearing a shirt that wasn't ostentatiously displaying her breasts, no cleavage, but also the shirt wasn't bolted on and holding her breasts perfectly in place either, they like her ass and thighs had a good amount of jiggle to them when she moved, just imagine the first time taking a big handful of those things through that shirt she's got on, wow! She took a seat.
Would you buy my novel? It's about a NEET who topples all worldwide governments by publishing a novel. The woman is a peripheral character

>>21503535
It's not just about the presence of breasts, but about how they're described.

>>21503560
>It's about a NEET who topples all worldwide governments by publishing a nove
Yes I would.
God speed anon.

>>21503560
is the novel in question this one?

>>21503560
>just imagine the first time taking a big handful of those things through that shirt
nggghhhhhhhhh

>>21503048
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmentalization_(psychology)

>>21503950
That's not it

the russian short story writer isaac babel fucking loves tits, i noticed. so many times when there's a female in one of his stories she has big bouncy gazongas
here's just two examples (from different stories)

>>21503535
Cute hobbit girl

>>21503560
No.

>>21505020
Hot

>>21503419
>tfw 6'2
>tfw tiny hand wristlet lanklet
I started keeping count after 3, and so far 14 women have made disparaging remarks about my small hands.

>>21503567
You are retarded. Breasts are literally a secondary sexual characteristic. Characters who ID a woman do so in the exact same way - and manner (more on that in a second) - as characters who ID a man based on broad shoulders, beard stubble, adams apple, large hands, etc. Breasts are literally a shorthand identifier of the highest order. That you feel they are drooled over in their every evocation sounds like repressed projection, to me: that you'd be scandalized by the notion of a secondary sexual characteristic being lightly fetishized means you're either a child or a blue haired psycho who can't cope with reality.

>>21501552
>boobed boobily
Men.
*coffee mug emoji*

Seething titlets always make me laugh. Girls, all you needed for your boobas to grow was to drink more milk as kids. Too late now i guess.

>>21503552
>girl
look again

>>21503560
>NEET who topples all worldwide governments by publishing a novel
id read

>>21503133
You're right. If you look at the sort of hobbies that so many men engage in now, gaming has become trucks, guns, knighthood etc. Porn is just about banging barely legals who look like anime characters

>>21506942
No, female hyenas have pseudopenes.

>>21503560

>>21506942
it's called a yeenis anon

>>21506313
I have small wrists but large hands, and an even larger penis.
I have never received a disparaging remark, although I do generally fuck MILFs rather than zoomers

She can just not read it. She's not forced to keep reading and the author doesn't need to change to fit her tastes.

>>21506313
do grip exercises retard

>>21506347
>as characters who ID a man based on broad shoulders, beard stubble, adams apple, large hands, etc.
Uh, that's blatant pandering to females(and homos) the second you start focusing on them.

>>21503560
very vivid, Melville couldn't paint a clearer picture

>>21509300
So why should the women (and homos) get less pandering than the men (and lesbians)?

>>21503560
Gigantically based

>>21506313
How did you know you started counting at 3 if you weren't counting before?

>>21510685
Good point

>>21508402
She's a woman. She's not reading because she wants to. She's reading because it's what her social circle does.

>>21511966
Yes, because I'm sure you know all about women.

>>21511984
No, of course not, a doctorate is required in the matter to even begin to pierce into the enigma that is woman.

>>21512591
Nobody can understand women, not even women themselves. They are a singularity, where all common sense breaks apart

>>21512644
>>21512591
>>21511984
Fags. Women are unfathomable not because they are deep, but because they are without depth. They cannot be fathomed at all because there is nothing to fathom.

>>21512644
that's just a convoluted way of saying that women are retarded, btw

>>21512644
Weak boomer era cope. It's as easy as reading Aristophanes or a comprehensive study on simian behaviour if you're scientifically inclined.
>>21512649
My post was obvious sarcasm genius.

>>21512649
Yeah, but singularity doesn't need to be "deep" and I didn't mean it. You don't know what's in the black hole, maybe there isn't anything either - just like with women.

>>21512591
If you just fucking asked us things instead of speculating you'd find we're not that difficult to understand. Though I'm autistic, your mileage may vary with neurotypical women.

>>21512655
I feel bad for women. I don't want to be sexist but they're incredibly shallow. "Literature" written by women essentially amounts to sadporn and desperate complaints about daddy. Really, the measure of the woman is daddy; She is either made or broken by him and for the rest of all of a woman's life she will be defined by daddy. "Daddy was so nice I love him" or constant deranged muttering about daddy. Even IRL, somehow, women just emit this pernicious aura of daddy fetishism.
I feel bad for them, because it makes you think about that saying of Protagoras. Man really is the measure of all things, even women.
Now, there is one small exception to this and it would happen to be Mary Shelley, but she is so unlike women that I am tempted to say that her writings were Percy's. There's just no way.

>>21512666
Lol lmao ok satan, I can't believe no one has ever thought of that.

>>21512670
>I feel bad for women. I don't want to be sexist but they're incredibly shallow. "Literature" written by women essentially amounts to sadporn and desperate complaints about daddy. Really, the measure of the woman is daddy; She is either made or broken by him and for the rest of all of a woman's life she will be defined by daddy. "Daddy was so nice I love him" or constant deranged muttering about daddy. Even IRL, somehow, women just emit this pernicious aura of daddy fetishism.
Have you considered the possibility that you are simply imagining things and jumping to your own conclusions.
>I feel bad for them, because it makes you think about that saying of Protagoras. Man really is the measure of all things, even women.
Tangential to the point at hand, but the word he used in Greek means 'human being' in general, not 'male human being' specifically.

>>21503429
Why have people started using horny as a noun?

>>21512677
>Tangential to the point at hand, but the word he used in Greek means 'human being' in general, not 'male human being' specifically.
Woman moment. I believe you that you're autistic because you couldn't understand that it was a joke playing off of protagoras and not a literal statement.

>>21512681
English word classes have been flexible for a long time. Shakespeare coined the use of 'elbow' as a verb, for instance.
>>21512687
I am autistic, but I also knew it was a joke, I was just nitpicking.

Tolstoy's Ressurection lol

>>21512681
infantilised zoomer redditbabble

>>21512666
Don't pretend, anon. Everyone knows that women don't really exist and it's just a hoax.

>>21512737
Who gave birth to you?

>>21512742
How am I suppose to know? I wasn't aware of being birthed.

>>21512677
>Have you considered the possibility that you are simply imagining things and jumping to your own conclusions.
Also mostly in jest, but the real problem with women (in literature especially) is their lack of abstract thinking. When I started on my literary journey I didn't have sexist expectations that women were shit authors, I just happened to realize one day that there was only one single book in my folder of garbage books that was written by a man, and only one good one written by a woman.
If I had to critically analyze the reason, I'd say it's because women tend to write about, and I think you'll agree, very basic emotional stories. Their works don't really have to do with abstract ideals of crime, justice, love, or spirituality, but the concrete and immediate "feel" of it. They are perpetually stuck in the feeling of everything and they aren't able to escape. When a man reads a woman's work he sees emotional blubbering and sensuousness but no higher meaning. Some men strain so hard to see something deeper that they hallucinate higher ideals- as in Pride and Prejudice, where the story is quite literally a master-quality romance novel but with no deeper meanings than the ones that men attach and women are forced to during college.
This could be because of societal conditioning or it could not. I'd reckon that it has to do with both the nurture and nature side. Women are more emotional and aren't as capable of casting aside the immediacy of their feelings to see the "higher meaning" behind things. When men write about feelings and emotions, it tends to be in highly abstract terms. Women tend not to like this; I've heard lots of women say "Blah blah well men always write about politics politics politics so fucking boring." They don't understand that those abstract ideas like "politics" and "philosophy" carry intense emotional baggage for men, the same way a woman views a paragraph on daddies huge hairy arms to be intensely emotional Even Ayn Rand, someone I should theoretically like based on trivial political similarities, can't help to make her works expressly about the emotional side of an issue rather than the abstract.
I don't mean to be blindly sexist. I don't think women are less intellectual or less intelligent; A lot of women that I've met are extremely intelligent, many much smarter than myself. The problem is that they CANNOT escape the biological hard-wiring that ENTRAPS them in the immediate, corporeal and sensual experience rather than the ideal and abstract.

Now examine women's "literature" and see it for what it is: Daddy fetishism. Pride and Prejudice? Taken by the Gyppo Bull. Gone with the Wind? Taken by the Irish Bull. Ayn Rand? Taken by the Anglo Bull. Think about all of your women authors and realize the truth. Bronte, Christie, Plath. Women just can't.

>>21512762
>I don't think women are less intellectual or less intelligent
As a midwit man I don't think that women are stupid either, in my opinion they just use their intellect for dumb and counterproductive shit. Take for example how they interact between each other and their social circles. They tend to look for unnecessary dramas or even worse, cause them themselves for fun or ostracizing someone they don't like. They envy a lot. They plot and try to find hidden meanings in simple social interactions, where there is none. Their friendships are fragile.

Here in Poland we even have an old saying "Where there is 6 female cooks, there won't be anything to eat". I guess people didn't start using it for no reason.

>>21512838
That is a really good way to put it. It sucks because women didn't choose to be born like that.

>>21512762
Honestly, I could say similar things about men, from a different direction. For instance, it doesn't make a lot of sense to me why some men are so obsessed with military history.

>>21512838
You have it right. My gf is 145 IQ but she can be just as retarded, usually is in fact. I learned much about women just observing her.

>>21512838
To add, I find the traditional Buddhist critique of women (that because of their bodies they are trapped in sensuality) much more apt than directly attacking their intelligence.

>>21512915
I agree. That's what this post is getting at >>21512762
Women are theoretically just as capable as men, but when a higher topic is approached a women fall into an inescapable emotional trap.

>>21512915
What's particularly special about women's bodies in that regard?

>>21512885
>why some men are so obsessed with
I think it still comes down to geopolitics and history in general. It's very interesting to know the events that lead to the world we know today. You can connect the dots and draw conclusions. It gives you context. Military itself is not that interesting, especially when it comes to numbers and dry facts. It's just a part of a bigger picture. At least in my case, I know that there are some folks that obsess strictly about it, but I think they are a minority. And when it comes to them, it's probably a fascination with power or just a craft itself (when it comes to weapons, armor etc.).

>>21512945
Nothing, he's referring to the idea that women experience the world differently and find difficulty achieving enlightenment(per buddhist thought)

>>21512959
How so?

>>21512945
Their entire bodies are evolutionarily designed for childbirth such that all other faculties are atrophied to make way for this massive compromise. The less fertile women were of course bred out and were much more likely to die in childbirth before the advent of modern medicine. Oestrogen also generally makes you less level-headed, less risk-tolerant, more reactive, etc. Apart from making you emotional, it literally makes you sensitive to the touch and overheat easily.

>>21513008
Overheat easily? I thought women got cold more easily.

>>21510685
Because I hate femoids and faggots.

>>21513037
whoops meant to say that

>>21513047
Should I just give up on reaching enlightenment in this life and hope to be born a man in my next life, then?

>>21513062
That's sort of what Buddhism teaches, although they have traditionally recognized female figures that have attained enlightenment in female form. The most common thought (excluding westoids that fuck every religion up to make sure it aligns to their eurocentric worldview) is that women can become enlightened but that it's far more difficult.

>>21513062
Well first of all don't ask me, or any autist on 4chan, for advice. But if you want my opinion find a nice guy, preferably of the same race who is as serious as you are, and start a family. There are plenty of guys in touch with their spirituality (which sounds really gay when typed out) who would like nothing more than to settle down with a girl who is aware of and yearns for the same thing. And the fact that you're asking such a question means you're already ahead of most people who lack the self-awareness to be aware of their shortcomings. I personally do think women have a harder time reaching 'enlightenment' but literally every religion and mythos has examples of female divinity and ideals to strive for. The most important thing for us is to escape from this modern schizophrenic opinion matrix all around us that keeps us chained to our passions and our ego, which for women often manifests in falling into some kind of feminist ideological rabbithole, mainstream or otherwise, which turns them against their own cultures and biology.

>>21513108
I wonder if being autistic makes it harder or easier.
>>21513119
I can't get pregnant, and I'm not sure I could handle the responsibility of raising kids even if we adopted or something.

>>21513124
Well you don't need to have kids to achieve gnosis, that wasn't really my point. In this context it's just a way to avoid vice and keep our anti-social tendencies in check.
>I wonder if being autistic makes it harder or easier.
Autists have a limited perception which can make it both easier and harder. In my experience, they tend to be more prone to addiction and be much more stuck in their ways which can make it harder. But on the other hand, they're definitely less susceptible to peer pressure, which is good.

>>21513062
Killing yourself now would help. The universe would know your devotion.

Some selections from The Complete Works of Isaac Babel.

>Her breasts jutted up like two taut sacks filled with seed.
>And she came over to Savitsky; her breasts, bobbing on her high heels, squirmed like an animal in a sack.
>And along with them the unmerciful sisters, who the night before gave us sleeping powders and now are wiggling their fresh breasts, bringing us trays with cococoa to drink
>The spurs on her boots clattered, her lace stockings were full of straw and spattered with dirt, her monstrous breasts went swinging toward her back.
>Sashka went over to him with her dangling breasts.
>She came to the ward a year ago-a tiny, efficient woman. The only large things about her were her heavy, milk-filled breasts.
>Beneath the lace of her low-cut chemise I could see the deepening onset of her pressed-down breasts, white and swollen
>Her fat, kindly breasts bounced in all directions.
>Her blouse stretches tightly over her fleshy back, her powerful nipples bounce energetically beneath the calico, protruding like quivering hillocks.
>She came floating in, engulfed by her fat, kindly breasts, carrying a tray on which stood a samovar.
>The maid with the pointed breasts moved ceremoniously about the room.
>A black-haired, pink-eyed woman, bearing her large breasts before her, came into the living room.
>Her satin arms flowed down toward the ground, her forehead grew pale, and the lace between her struggling breasts swerved and trembled.
>She brought a bottle and two glasses from the dining room. Her breasts lay loose in the silken sack of her dress. Her nipples stiffened, the silk impeding them.
>I opened the door a crack to say hello to her, but saw a mulatto woman in the corridor with a cockscomb of horselike hair and large, dangling, hoisted-up breasts.
>Madame Truffaut's lilac breasts tumbled in her lace blouse, her elephantine legs strode through the room, her eyes flashed.
>Her long breasts swing, like washing hung to dry in a yard on a windy day.
>The raised revolutionary breasts of the women's battalion are streaming down the street, which is filled with loafers and hollering children.

>>21513180
Coomer phenotype

>>21513124
Also join our Plotinus reading group faggot

>>21512885
It's the male equivalent to true crime.

>>21513062
>>21512762
Best writer ever is a woman though

>>21513180
Sounds pretty awful

>>21513222
checked and who?

>>21513255
Alice Munro. Nobel prize winning Canadian author who is the undisputed goat (undisputed) of short stories and the disputed goat of fiction writing in general.

If you're going to read a story to check her out I'd recommend one of the following
>Runaway
>Trespasses
>Powers
>The View From Castle Rock
>The Ottawa Valley
>My Mother's Dream
>Vandals
>Material
>Silence

>>21513222
Are you the one that posted this >>21513239
Lmao, even she can't avoid more feminine writing proclivities.

>>21513291
Yes. I'm the only Munro shill on lit and I make all the posts you'll see about her
>lmao even she can't avoid writing about woman
She is one

>>21513298
Therein lies the problem. She could be an excellent writer but men want something more substantive than more babbling about emotions.

>>21513305
Try reading her. Her stories are both page turners and profound. A difficult combination.

>>21513313
What would you say is her most profound work? Recommend a story to prove that women are capable of writing something that isn't a trite social commentary about current year or her daddy.

>>21513345
I listed my story recs. But every collection is good. You'd probably want to avoid Who Do You Think You Are and Lives of Girls and Women. Runaway contains the greatest density of her most interesting stories (imo) and The View From Castle Rock (the title of a collection and story) details the semi-fictional story of her pioneer ancestors who immigrated to Canada from Scotland and utilizes a number of genres. It's not my favourite collection by her but the title story is one of her best ever.
>>21513289

>>21505020
Babel has nothing on Kharms. Sadly, modern /lit/izens have no idea he once was well studied here.

The Lecture

Pushkov said:
— Woman is the workbench of love.
And he immediately received a clout across the gob.
— What's that for? — asked Pushkov.
But, not getting any answer to his question, he continued:
— This is what I think: a woman should be tackled from below. Women really like this and only pretend that they don't like it.
At this point Pushkov was again struck across the gob.
— But what on earth is this, comrades! If that's the way it is, I won't carry on speaking — said Pushkov.
But, after waiting about a quarter of a minute, he continued:
— A woman is so built that she is all soft and damp.
At this point Pushkov was again struck across the gob. Pushkov tried to pretend that he hadn't noticed this and went on:
— If you just sniff a woman...
But at this point Pushkov was so slammed across the gob that he caught hold of his cheek and said:
— Comrades, under these conditions it is absolutely impossible to deliver a lecture. If this happens again, I shall discontinue.
Pushkov waited for a quarter of a minute and then continued:
— Now, where were we? Ah, yes. That was it. A woman loves to look at herself. She sits down in front of the mirror completely naked...
At this word, Pushkov again received a clout across the gob.
— Naked — repeated Pushkov.
Smack! — he was weighed into right across the gob.
— Naked! — yelled Pushkov.
Smack! — he received a clout across the gob.
— Naked! A naked woman! A nude tart! — Pushkov kept yelling. Smack! Smack! Smack! — Pushkov took it across the gob.
— A nude tart with a ladle in her hands! — yelled Pushkov.
Smack! Smack! — the blows rained down on Pushkov.
— A tart's bum-hole! — yelled Pushkov, dodging the blows. — A nude nun!
But at this point Pushkov was struck with such force that he lost consciousness and crumpled to the floor as though pole-axed.

>>21513547
I love sensual women and not passionate ones. A passionate woman closes her eyes, moans and shouts and the enjoyment of a passionate woman is blind. A passionate woman writhes about, grabs you with her hands without looking where, clasps you, kisses you, even bites you and hurries to reach her climax as soon as she can. She has no time to display her sexual organs, no time to examine, touch with the hand and kiss your sexual organs, she is in such a hurry to slake her passion. Having slaked her passion, the passionate woman will fall asleep. The sexual organs of a passionate woman are dry. A passionate woman is always in some way or another mannish.

The sensual woman is always feminine.

Her contours are rounded and abundant.

The sensual woman rarely reaches a blind passion. She savours sexual enjoyment. The sensual woman is always a woman and even in an unaroused state her sexual organs are moist. She has to wear a bandage on her sexual organs, so as not to soak them with moisture.

When she takes the bandage off in the evening, the bandage is so wet that it can be squeezed out.

Thanks to such an abundance of juices, the sexual organs of a sensual woman give off a slight, pleasant smell which increases strongly when the sensual woman is aroused. Then the juice from her sexual organs is secreted in a syrupy stream.

A sensual woman likes you to examine her sexual organs.

>>21513558
But the artist sat the nude model on the table and moved her legs apart. The girl hardly resisted and merely covered her face with her hands.

Amonova and Strakhova said that first the girl should have been taken off to the bathroom and washed between her legs, as any whiff of such an aroma was simply repulsive. The girl wanted to jump up but the artist held her back and asked her to take no notice and sit there, just as he had placed her. The girl, not knowing what she was supposed to do, sat back down again. The artist and his female colleagues took their respective seats and began sketching the nude model. Petrova said that the nude model was a very seductive woman, but Strakhova and Amonova said that she was rather plump and indecent. Zolotogromov said that this was what made her seductive, but Strakhova said that this was simply repulsive, and not at all seductive.

— Look — said Strakhova — ugh! It's pouring out of her on to the table cloth. What is there seductive about that, when I can sniff the smell off her from here.

Petrova said that this only showed her feminine strength. Abel'far blushed and agreed. Amonova said she had seen nothing like it, that you get to the highest point of arousal and it still wouldn't secrete like this girl did. Petrova said that, faced with that, one could get aroused oneself and that Zolotogromov must already be aroused.

Zolotogromov agreed that the girl was having quite an effect on him. Abel'far sat there red in the face and she was breathing heavily.

— However, the air in this room is becoming unbearable — said Strakhova. Abel'far fidgeted on her chair and then leapt up and went out of the room.

— There — said Petrova — you see the result of female seductiveness. It even acts on the ladies. Abel'far has gone off to put herself to rights. I can feel that I will soon have to do the same thing.

— That — said Amonova — only shows the advantage we thin women possess. Everything with us is always as it should be. But both you and Abel'far are splendiferous ladies and you have to keep yourselves very much in check.

— Yet — said Zolotogromov — splendiferousness and a certain lack of bodily hygiene are what is to be particularly valued in a woman.

>>21513564
https://www.oocities.org/athens/8926/Kharms/Incidences.html

>>21512762
What's the one good female book?

>>21512885
Great example of what the anon above was talking about with the female brain.

I mean just look at this. 51% of the populace is... this.

>>21513062
Nah, you just need the help of a man. I produce a lot of spare enlightenment that seeps from time to time out so If you have a receptacle of some kind we can make something work.

>>21513547
Healthy jej

>>21513162
Isn't that supposed to be a one-way ticket to Naraka?
>>21513198
Where do I do that? (Though I'm not sure my Greek is up to the task.)
>>21513217
What if I don't really get the obsession with true crime either?
>>21514916
How so?

>>21503048
madonna-whore-complex but for women

?

>>21502288
Obviously a part of the novel which obtrudes in a way harming the flow and rhythm of the narrative is unnecessary and detracts from the book in the same way a random clown nose would detract from a painting it didn’t fit in with

>>21515777
Elaborate.

>>21503560
Kino.

>>21510685
Women like reading about boobs too

>>21517693
I mean, I do, but I'm bi. I can't imagine straight women would enjoy reading sexualized drooling over women any more than straight men would enjoy reading sexualized drooling over men.

>>21517696
I thought any girl looks at other girls, maybe not sexually but more like admiring or even envious.

>>21503567
is the word "admirable" sexual? Is a single adjective too much description for a woman's chest?

>>21501552
>She uncoupled her bra. What he had expected to see was two enormous marshmallows that would feel like what he imagined clouds felt like, complete with perky nipples. This couldn't be farther from the truth. What he ended up seeing could best be described as fried eggs stapled to the wall. Well, if fried eggs had pink yolks and veiny whites. Her nipples were certainly the type that no infant could latch on them, the poor baby would be on Similac for its formative years, and shopping for them would be a pain, as well, for even if you got them out of their protective cases in the fixtures, roving gangs of swarthy shoplifters were ready to pick them out of shopping carts and run out the door with their loot. Back to the breasts. For a woman so relatively young, they sure sagged a lot. He wondered if that was just genetics or if she made regrettable choices, probably the latter as she had a variety of ugly tattoos, which he just now noticed, probably because her breasts had been so malformed.

This is why I now describe the color and shape of their cunts.

>>21517899
Do you also describe its smell?

>>21517741
I don't know, I don't know what being straight is like.