/lit/ - Literature

>"mfw" pictures are images which are not defined by concept, but by context and even more importantly by reception. The meaning or being of the image is forever skewed and obscured. In the process of its reception there is the inherent (and likely) possibility of it being taken by others to further skew and obscure both concept and context.

>>2139805
>mfw yfw

>>2139794
I would like more pictures of the girl that represents Last.fm.

ITT: We discuss how tripfags never post anything worthwhile and only delude themselves into thinking they are posting something that has some sort of meaning outside of their own minds.

>>2139958
>try to start a thread
>Bothersome once again breaks in with hurrrr tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfagstripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfagstripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfagstripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfagstripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags tripfags
You are easily the worst of us due to your focus on us.

Oh yeah and bump.

Bump

this could be a worthwhile thread

I'll think about this and maybe post later

>>2140037
Just like any self-deluded literary critic, you are trying to find meaning where there isn't any. But you will find meaning, even if you have to create it from nothing.

it's just an imageboard, you guys

>>2140079
thats what we all do everyday
but there are some ppl aware of it and others that arent
some ppl try to do it deliberatelly while everyone just keeps doin it without without knowing
but u cant control meaning production
it is only possible to do it consciously