/lit/ - Literature

>>21383728
>big brain
>IQ
KEK

Retarded "calculation". It's literally just a check for uncommon words and over artificial grammar.

I could write you a "300+ IQ" text if I wanted to, or just straight up slap my keyboard and call you a retard if you don't understand my text.

Here is a 9001 IQ text
afjdhfah poaufhnpijhnskjfnbaspkdbfakjsph hfdapdsfpdhf pohwepuoihpuwrh asfh asjldjklsbhaps hpoasfhfla lasdhf ldasladshjf.
If you can't read this you are a low IQ shitter and should feel bad.

Now fuck off with this bullshit made by a retard.

>>21383745

>>21383745
Autism is really doing a number on you, huh?
>>21383758
kek

>>21383758

apparently, thus far, i am.

>>21383758
Lmfao

>>21383758
Absolutely devastating.

>>21383728
lol does this site just give out genius iq to literally anyone? a poorly written paragraph from my journal that i submitted ranks me as a genius. how does the algorithm eevn determine this? the fact that a simple unexplored musing on art fetches an iq score of 142

>>21385310
not to mention the all the spelling errors.

Excerpts from my manuscript range from between 98 and 147

Proust

>>21383728
IQ-mogged all of /lit/ with a silly afterthought

I have to agree with >>21383745
The use of rare words doesn't constitute an above average ability to write, nor does it gauge correctly how much sense the author is actually making.
Hemingway said as much when he was criticized for his terse prose.

It's much harder to write anything with substance that doesn't come across as over-elaborate.
This calculator can't tell the difference between pretentious archaisms and striking metaphor, however witty the latter may be.

I'm absolutely retarded and can't write that well and my needlessly complicated pieces scored significantly higher than the ones I value more because of their brevity.

>>21388641
>picrel my point

>>21388502
I bet if you probe the guy who wrote this a little you'll find out he's a popsci addict who doesn't understand the mathematics of GR at all.