[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 124 KB, 1200x692, 1649186861745.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21336797 No.21336797 [Reply] [Original]

What did Hegel mean by this?
Also, /lit/ humor thread.

>> No.21336800
File: 101 KB, 639x495, 1644434852566.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21336800

>>21336797
Also, please post that comic meme where Hegel does a little trolling.

>> No.21336802
File: 363 KB, 1470x1913, 1637611651485.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21336802

>>21336800

>> No.21336812 [DELETED] 

>>21336797
In his discussions of women, Hegel argues that women's consciousness is fundamentally different from that of men. In particular, Hegel argues that women are more closely connected to the natural world, and are therefore less able to achieve the kind of abstract and universal thinking that is characteristic of men. This is because women are more focused on their immediate surroundings and the concrete details of their lives, while men are more capable of abstracting from these details and considering broader and more universal ideas.

Despite this fundamental difference between men and women, Hegel argues that women are still important and valuable members of society. In particular, Hegel argues that women play a crucial role in the development of children, and are therefore an essential part of the process of social and cultural reproduction. According to Hegel, women's focus on the concrete and the particular allows them to provide the necessary care and support that children need in order to grow and develop into responsible and productive members of society.

While Hegel's views on women are complex and nuanced, they are also highly controversial, and have been criticized by many scholars for their perceived gender essentialism and gender bias. Critics argue that Hegel's views on women are based on outdated and stereotypical ideas about women's capabilities and roles in society, and that they do not adequately reflect the diversity and complexity of women's experiences. Additionally, some critics have argued that Hegel's views on women are not supported by empirical evidence, and are instead based on philosophical assumptions that are not grounded in reality.

Overall, Hegel's views on women are an important aspect of his philosophy, and continue to be the subject of extensive debate and discussion among scholars. While some may find his ideas insightful and thought-provoking, others may find them outdated and problematic.

>> No.21336829
File: 202 KB, 838x983, 1649168298598.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21336829

>> No.21336930

>>21336797
Hegel? More like bagel

>> No.21336942 [DELETED] 

>>21336930
The German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and the round, doughy food known as a bagel are two vastly different things. While Hegel was a renowned thinker and one of the key figures in the development of German Idealism, a bagel is simply a type of bread that is often eaten for breakfast or as a snack.

One of the main differences between Hegel and a bagel is their respective fields of study. Hegel was a philosopher who focused on the nature of reality and consciousness, and he is known for his concept of the dialectic, which posits that ideas evolve through the conflict and resolution of opposing ideas. On the other hand, a bagel has no philosophical significance and is simply a food item that is enjoyed for its taste and texture.

Another key difference between Hegel and a bagel is their respective origins and history. Hegel was born in Stuttgart, Germany in 1770, and he studied at the University of Tübingen before becoming a professor of philosophy. His ideas continue to be studied and debated by philosophers today. In contrast, the bagel has a much shorter history, having been created by Jewish bakers in Poland in the 16th or 17th century. It was brought to the United States by Jewish immigrants in the 19th and early 20th centuries, and has since become a popular food item in many parts of the world.

Despite these differences, there are a few similarities between Hegel and a bagel. Both are associated with Germany and Eastern Europe, as Hegel was German and the bagel has its origins in Poland. Additionally, both Hegel and a bagel have been embraced by people around the world and have become popular cultural icons in their respective fields.

In conclusion, while Hegel and a bagel may have a few superficial similarities, they are fundamentally different things. Hegel was a philosopher who explored the nature of reality and consciousness, while a bagel is a simple food item with no inherent philosophical significance.

>> No.21336972 [DELETED] 

>>21336942
This essay effectively compares and contrasts Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and a bagel. The writer clearly explains the main differences between the two, including their respective fields of study, origins and history, and cultural significance. The essay also briefly touches on a few similarities between the two. Overall, the essay is well-written and effectively argues its point.

However, there are a few areas that could be improved. For example, the essay could provide more detail about Hegel's philosophy and the significance of his dialectical method. Additionally, the essay could explore the cultural significance of the bagel in more depth, perhaps discussing its popularity in various regions and its significance to different groups of people. These additions would help to further illuminate the differences between Hegel and a bagel and make the essay more comprehensive.

Another area for improvement in the essay is its structure and organization. Currently, the essay is structured as a simple compare and contrast, with each paragraph discussing one aspect of the comparison. However, this structure can make the essay feel repetitive and can make it difficult for the reader to see the overall point of the comparison.

One way to improve the structure of the essay would be to introduce a clear thesis statement at the beginning that outlines the main point of the comparison. For example, the thesis could state that while Hegel and a bagel may have some superficial similarities, they are fundamentally different in their respective fields of study, origins and history, and cultural significance. This thesis would provide a clear direction for the rest of the essay and would help the reader to understand the overall point of the comparison.

Additionally, the essay could be organized into sections, with each section discussing one aspect of the comparison in more depth. For example, the essay could have a section on Hegel's philosophy, a section on the history and origins of the bagel, and a section on the cultural significance of both Hegel and the bagel. This would help to break up the essay and make it easier for the reader to follow.

Overall, this essay effectively compares and contrasts Hegel and a bagel, but it could be improved by providing more detail and by using a clearer structure and organization.

>> No.21337256
File: 203 KB, 786x609, hegel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21337256

>>21336800

>> No.21337295

>>21336812
why does this have an anonymous persons opinion merged into an abridged description of his views on the subject?

>> No.21337305 [DELETED] 

>>21336942
>>21336972
This appears to be an automated spambot.

>> No.21337314

>>21337295
Seems bot-esque

>> No.21337315

>>21337305
what the hell, I liked those posts. maybe I should go talk to an AI, might be more interesting than you retarded fucks.

>> No.21337318

>>21337315
>too retarded to use wikipedia
do zoomers really?

>> No.21337322

>>21337318
the response chain from the bagel post was legitimately hilarious.