[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 76 KB, 282x430, dar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21243498 No.21243498 [Reply] [Original]

How is phenomenology even a thing after this banger dropped?

>> No.21243508

Deleuze was a silly goose

>> No.21243514

>>21243498
give me cliff notes i cant read

>> No.21243619

>>21243498
Explain why you think this btfos phenomenology

>> No.21243626

>>21243619
Deleuzeans dont explain things sweatie, they tell you that your request for clarification is fascism

>> No.21243648

>>21243498
I second this guy >>21243619. I like Deleuze a lot but this is a weak thread. Just three bullet points about why you think so would get the ball rolling, so to speak.

>> No.21243682

>>21243498
Deleuze was a silly goose

>> No.21243698

>>21243682
Deleuze was a funny fella

>> No.21243699
File: 1.46 MB, 2289x1701, 1611312397491.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21243699

>>21243498
Because the breakdown of the phenomenology of the realer than real aspects of NDEs when contrasted with the phenomenology of everyday life that is outlined in this banger crushes all skeptical counter-arguments forever. And nothing in the book you provided refutes it.

Of course, nothing gets normies and NPCs more uncomfortable than the idea that NDEs are ACTUALLY real, and that there are valid reasons to think that they are and that we should take them seriously.

Here is an extremely persuasive argument for why NDEs are real:

https://youtu.be/U00ibBGZp7o

It makes a huge deal about the fact that NDErs are representative of the population as a whole, and that when people go deep into the NDE, they all become convinced. As this article points out:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mysteries-consciousness/202204/does-afterlife-obviously-exist

>"Statistics collected show that the "deeper" the NDE the greater the percentage of those who come away certain of the existence of the afterlife. Among those with the deepest experiences 100 percent came away agreeing with the statement, "An afterlife definitely exists"."

Since NDErs are representative of the population as a whole, and they are all convinced, then 100% of the population become convinced that there is an afterlife when they have a sufficiently deep NDE themselves. And so would you, me, or anyone, including the most dogmatic atheists and skeptics, because it is VASTLY more self-evidently real than this brief little experience of life on Earth we have now. When you dream and wake up, you instantly realize that life is more real than your dreams. When you have an NDE, the same thing is happening, but on a higher level, as you immediately realize that life is the deep, deep dream and the NDE world is the undeniably real world by comparison.

>> No.21243703

>>21243699
>realer than real
This is also a feature of bipolar psychosis

>> No.21243846

>>21243619
keep this thread alive when I can take amphetamines again right now I'm burned out

>> No.21243850

>>21243846
alive until monday*

>> No.21245032

>>21243498
>How is phenomenology even a thing after this banger dropped?
Well, Husserl wrote after Nietzsche... and DR was written as a formally enriched Nietzsche & Philosophy... a book performing as contemporaneous with Husserl, a post-kantian text that is almost bit to bit contrastable with Husserl's (some people say Heidegger, but I don't think so).

So, DR could not destroy Phenomenology because it was written to be readed as contemporary with that branch of Post-Kantianism-

>> No.21245280

>>21243498
Explain why you think this btfos phenomenology

>> No.21245485
File: 461 KB, 900x730, 1628697284648.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21245485

>>21245032
This. And school of thought fights are for nerds that can't do philosophy themselves (pace Deleuze's own claim)