/lit/ - Literature

>>21209291
lmao, this is just a front for the Nihilology. Until you understand the fact that an understanding of Nothingness is the only important thing in philosophy you will forever be a pseud.

Why ask why?

>>21209291
What if I was taught it on day TWO?

>>21209359
Well all the students actually attend day 2 so it defeats the purpose doesn't it? You teach it on the day they're not there.

>>21209291
Infinite reasoning seems fine.

>>21209299
usually its this kind of gatekeeping that makes people forever pseud

>>21209291
but this isn't the greeks tho

>>21209291
>the chain must terminate in one of only three options
why?
>>21209408
also this

>>21209394
If you're God, yeah.

>>21209291
ask why?

>>21209291
imagine philosophy identifying it's own limits

>>21209339
You don't remember being six years old? You used to fuck with your parents like this pseud thread is trying to do.

Isn't there another infographic where deductive reasoning is an option?

>>21209491
imagine philosophy NOT identifying it's own limits.

>>21209503
Why would I want to remember being six years old and fucking with my parents?

>>21209291
Wrong. You can have an infinite circle that is spawned by brute facts that are in contradiction with one another.

Also, A ≠ A.

Why am I stupid? because I have low IQ.
Why do I have low IQ? because Im stupid

>>21209291
lmao, this is only if youre an autist. people can, in fact, just say things and make connections

>>21209901
Holy shit m8 thank you for the card fellow erudite.

>>21209291
This was already extensively explained by Aristotle in the Organon, why is it called Munhhausen's trillema?

>>21209919
What you're not getting is that you are not defined by the qualities intrinsic in your human condition; you are valuable without axiom. Live your life under love and respect truth; do no harm but do not dwell on your IQ-metric, for your Calling is Beyond what you were born with. You are always evolving, Anon, and never let them tell you you're not beautiful.

There is nothing wrong with axiomatic grounding in itself. It's only a problem in the sense that it has zero persuasive power since it can't be shown to follow from a previous fact the other person would agree to - it must be the fact the other person agrees to, or the conversation is over. But that does not inherently make something false.

>>21210852
G*rmans like to imagine they are being original when they write philosophy.

Friendly reminder that the most legitimate answer to any philosophical "why" is "it just is, okay?"

>>21209417
>why?
It's how logic works. You can ignore it but then your statements won't have any decipherable structure.

>>21211447
Friendly reminder that this man like all of you here is braindead.

>>21209291
Radical Skeptics always win, antiskeptic arguments aren't really arguments, they're just excuses made up by coping faggots.

>>21211527
Not really. Hegel demolishes radical skepticism in PhS. If the world isn't rational than anything can follow from anything else. This doesn't just imply solipsism, it implies zero meaning, identity, or knowledge.

But no one lives like this. Even the skeptics aren't convinced. Meanwhile, even the most hardcore physicalist still has to accept the validity of logic as something posterior to scientific knowledge.

The skeptic has no answer for the induction is so effective or why deduction appears true.

>>21211696
More excuses kek

>>21209291
ok. why should i care?

>>21209291
>Soul
>Nous
>
Secret?