[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 10 KB, 190x272, rene-guenon_12884.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20888372 No.20888372 [Reply] [Original]

I read The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times, and I noticed how Guenon manages to make all his problematic claims unfalsifiable.

He even claims that the laws of nature have changed along history, which is enough to make any archeological, geological and physical evidente against him useless.

I know that this is a reddit-tier question, but does he accidentally make any falsifiable claim that can be used against him? This is not the best approach to Guenon, but I'm just asking out of curiosity.

>> No.20888377

>>20888372
>reading a mystic through bugman lenses
only redditors

>> No.20888408

>>20888377
He wasnt a mystic, just a sophisticated midwit/pseud/LARPer
>>20888372
Guenon is crap. Get into pneumaticism. It's a scientific theory.

>> No.20889260

>>20888372
>>20888408
ive always wondered whats it like to live with half a brain

>> No.20889303

>>20888372
>He even claims that the laws of nature have changed along history, which is enough to make any archeological, geological and physical evidente against him useless.
Now you're understanding why science requires faith in *something* in order to operate. Because how do you know that the laws of nature are the same now as they were 1000 years ago? Even Big Bang theorists admitted that the laws of nature must have been much different in the beginning, when the universe was a hot, dense singularity.

>> No.20889352

>>20888372
There is no point trying to falsify his claims because they are not 'claims' at all in any sort of externalised scientific correspondence type manner - all of the things he talks about are truths derived from intellectual intuition which enjoys full certainty (at least from the perspective of the Universal, if not in its application to contingent domains such as that of nature). now some have critiqued Guenon for this conception of truth, which has the quirk of "if you see, you see, if not, then not", but that is only if you have the presupposition of truth being a public, falsifiable, scientific proposition, which is exactly what Guenon disagrees with in the first place.

>> No.20889392

>>20888372
>He even claims that the laws of nature have changed along history, which is enough to make any archeological, geological and physical evidente against him useless.
He is right. Some laws of physics are not as static as people have been led to believe.
https://esotericawakening.com/what-is-reality-the-holofractal-universe

>> No.20889396

>>20889352
this
people just don't get from 'where' Guénon is speaking, it's not a matter of right, wrong, opinion or research, all of that simply disappears when you look at things from the same 'position' as he looked
ultimately either you get it or not, there's not a middle position, but to get there you need to read 'The symbolism of the cross' and 'The multiple states of the being'

>> No.20889425

I can't think of anything, even when he predicts events he makes it clear that it's just a prediction and not a "prophecy".

>> No.20889503

>>20889260
That's because you have only a quarter brain

>> No.20889741

>>20888372
There's something off about this picture. I can't put my finger on it but I can't believe a human looks like this.

>> No.20889750

>>20889741
He almost certainly had autism. Maybe it's that.

>> No.20889765

>>20888372
>Guenon
Who?

>> No.20889816

>>20889503
epic comeback for a fourth grader no doubt

>> No.20889992

>>20888372
Idk but I've also observed this, in general his worldview is incredibly coherent, that's why so many people see him as infallible

>> No.20890015
File: 200 KB, 640x1156, 1658273845027078.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20890015

>>20889741
impressively low face width-height ratio, almost alien
pbuh

>> No.20890031

>>20889741
He has an extremely long face. Odd how low your aesthetic sense is if you genuinely couldn't tell that this is what makes him look off.