/lit/ - Literature

>>20688681
Not him. That's for sure.

>>20688704
Peterson is arguably more important because his messages aren't obfuscated by purely theoretical philosophical meanderings, but clearly you're not ready to have that conversation

>>20688717

Almost all of Peterson's 'original' messages are obfuscated by theoretical philosophical meanderings. He's an ivory-tower liberal who has been making a collective income of over $1.5 million dollars a year for two decades and then doubled that amount with internet fame. How could he not be purely theoretical philosophical meandering? He misconstrues the core thesis of many of those writers he professes impacted him the most and his actual intellectual pursuits are in the weakest and most controversial field of pseudo-medicine that exists, psychology. Despite this, people look to him for definitive answers on history, theology, political discourse, and other things he has zero qualifications in.

>>20688717
They aren't obfuscated by meaning, research or truth either. On the plus side if he ever decided to pursue DnD he'd make a great DM. His fantasy world about chaos dragons, lobsters and mostpodern meonarxists is colourful and could probably be turned into a pretty cool board game.

>>20688681
fucking shills! a thread died for this!fuck you! fuck you.

>>20688764
The world could use a good DnD game after the Jews came and acted as a massive buzzkill.

>>20688681
Not Peterson. He doesn't even get Nietzsche right. I still sort of like him but he's not great.

>>20688681
Alexander Stern
Lyotard
Sloterdijk
Byung Chul-Han

>>20688717
lmao

>>20688681
>>20688717
I literally have no idea why people like this even come to /lit/. they obvioisly don't read, but even worse they're not even humbled by their own stupidity and ignorance so to at least know how retarded they are and maybe try to better themselves.

>>20688764
Don't give him any ideas.
If there's anything he's good at it's soulless money making.