/lit/ - Literature

>>20658318
I would read her 7 books any day if you know what I mean

quality over quantity

>>20658318
I read 7 books a year.

our queen triggering readlets once again, keep seething losers

>>20658357
kek

How much of what she reads does she actually retain?

>>20658537
Enough to make you seethe and question your self-worth

>>20658318
Women are simply better at literature. I kneel.

>>20658537
im browsing her channel and it’s hilarious. she wrote a self published book that has poor reviews on amazon and she just graduated from a uni that has a 90% acceptance rate.

>>20658537
None of those books are hard to retain

>>20658542
1 crumb of roastie pussy has been deposited into your account.

>>20658567
is she the female version of RC Waldun?

>>20658597
appears so

>>20658581
How can I work my way up to two crumbs?

>>20658318
No, I'm not into consooming books

im watching her favorite books video rn and it’s nothing impressive. she also read the emily wilson translation of homer lol

>>20658622
is that the one with "tell me of a complicated man" ?

>>20658629
yes

>>20658318
When does she have sex?

>>20658647
she's a pure English rose, although she takes a year off now to "discover herself"

>>20658634
I wish I could make bullshit translations and get paid.

>>20658567
Which uni

>>20658597
he is delusional tryhard pseudo intellectual
she is just lovely girl who like reading light stuff

>>20658680
fr

>>20658682
exeter

>>20658318
>7 books in 16 hours
she read a full book in 2 hours?

>>20658907
she has to be skimming

Does reading 7 books a day mean anything if you can't retain shit? The closest thing I've seen is someone writing 1k lines of code a day, all awful and hard to read.

>>20658978
It is all YA schlock that can be read in 30 minutes by anyone who is not a mediocre white woman

>>20658996
yeah im looking more into the books, and the thomas mann one, for instance, is only 20k words. she’s basically reading short stories.

oh man it gets worse, she reads literal children’s books

Is this an exclusively female phenomenon?

>>20658318
>be modern white women
>brag about double digit bodycount
>read literature aimed at 12 year olds
>brag about your bookcount as well
these creatures are fucked in the head

>>20659075
This is what I hate about my generation. No one actually reads and they go to any length to avoid it. The ones that "do read" are only reading schlock like this and other YA genre fiction. There are children's books worth a read like treasure island and watership down but everyone keeps going for the harry potter clones. They aren't reading, they're watching tv through text. This is why "waking up" from zoomer culture was both the best and hardest thing to do. It's like Plato's Cave but its only you whose escaped. You feel lonely and angry at this bullshit problem that shpulden't exist and that the answer is so simple for.

>>20659156
i deeply question how different things were in past generations though.

>>20659195
I know for a fact past generations didn't spend a third of their life staring at their hands. I know past generations lived closer together and you could go to a friend's house just like that. I know young men didn't waste hours on video games and played sports or developed actual skills and spent most of the day outside. I know that past generations couldn't just 'block' someone and were forced to sort things out when they inevitably ran into eachother. I know past generations of men had thrice the amount of testosterone we have. That you didn't have to deal with fags and trannies. I know that past geberations had a much wider attention span and that great classics of literature were mandatory to learn in school instead of the hunger games (which they still let you pass with top marks if you only watched the movie). Women weren't fat she-beasts, men were masculine and you had a good idea what was waiting for you when you got home from work.
If you actually look at older generations it is irrefutable to claim you have been robbed. Robbed of relationships, robbed of family, robbed of enlightenment.

>>20659259
chud alert

>>20659259
And you're not allowed to point out the reasons or people purposely ignore this. Women have the excuse of being women but men were supposed to struggle and triumph in the face of hardship. We're still not seeing that. Men are now feminised and weak. We have hit all the precursor's to a society's collapse yet people people seem to think we're immune to patterns that no civilisation has eacaped. Has no one learnt from history so we are doomed to repeat?

>>20659272
>>20659259
You know what's one the main causes of this?
Capitalism

>>20659275
Communism/Marxism/Socialism is literally a symptom of modernity. It is a modern (see also: Jewish) invention made with the intention of destroying a country of its values. The people who made it were either nihilists or terrorists.

>>20659275
this lol

>>20659275
Capitalism isn't the problem. The faults in capitalist societies stem from undemocratic and socialist policy.

I guess she never misses, huh

>>20659296
You know why classics are no longer taught at schools and humanities funding is constatly being cut?
It doesn't make money

You know why families are now in smaller units, extended families are next to nonexistant and the elderly are sent to homes?
Easier to market to and get money out of them.
The nuclear family has been the most damaging creation to families. 18? get out and get your own place. Old? off to the senior home.

Hormonal inbalance?
Hormones on food to produce more for less and make a bigger profit

incels

>>20658318
god i want to have sex with the boygirl in the op picture

>>20658537
Not much. But this looks like a one time challenge instead of a regular thing, so whatever.

>>20659156
>>20659259
>>20659272
>>20659309
>>20659328

>>20659680
I'm sorry to tell you this, anon, but that's just a woman

>>20659328
>The nuclear family has been the most damaging creation to families
Nice try schlomo.
This is completely stupid reasoning. Care for the elderly has been a staple of every civilisation and is still heavily practiced and emphasised in non-American capitalist countries today. In fact the discarding of the elderly was practiced in socialist countries because they couldn't afford to feed them without starving themselves. The destruction of the family unit leads to more elderly being sent to die in homes. You could move out and start a family at 18 because housing was cheaper and jobs were better paying and plentiful. And ypu were still in contact with community. Modern socialist policies like rent control and minimum wage ruined this, a lot of the time with the direct intent to do so (see minimum wage against lower capacity workers like the physically/mentally disabled). You just want to blame capitalism for everything instead of actually thinking.

>>20659735
ngmi

>>20659954
What does that even mean? What is "never gonna make it" have to do with what I said. You're just spouting the next buzzword in your dictionary like a bot.

>>20659970
He's right, though. You're never gonna make it.

In fact, I hope you don't.

>>20659982
based

>>20659982
>>20659990
Cope Samefag

>>20660112

>>20659275
No, strictly speaking the main cause of this is the dialectic of Marxism and Capitalism.
You had a synthesis (Fascism) that was rejected by both and torn down, which left the only possibility being a new synthesis, or holding onto the status quo, so both took some ideas from the other, and that's where you get these unholy abominations like Social Democracies or "State Capitalism".

>>20660158
I rescind my accusation. There can be more than one retard.

>>20660177
No, there's definitely only one retard here.

>>20660180
So far no one has refuted my argument. Your only responses are buzzwords. If I'm wrong, explain why. All you resolve to are ad hominems.

>>20659665
You're not hot.

>>20658542
>>20658562
>>20658567
>>20658581
I'm 40, I don't care about some cunts collection of "literature". I care only about what "I" retain and nothing more. If a car ran her over tomorrow, I would simply just go about my day and not shed a tear. Women aren't inexpendable as they think they are, and artificial wombs are the inevitable future. Stay mad.

>>20660244
cope

It's actually insane how easy genre fiction is to read. You could easily do more than 7 if you had the free time

>>20658537
not much but if she's reading for fun it doesn't matter, I don't remember every film/tv show I've watched in vivid detail - the whole retention question is based on the idea the only reason to read is to learn and it can't be an enjoying thing in and of itself

>>20661179
>not much but if she's reading for fun it doesn't matter, I don't remember every film/tv show I've watched in vivid detail
Brainlet mindset.

>>20658537
Many books aren’t any different than watching an episode of a tv show or shitty movie. “Retain” is a meme when you’re discussing mass market books. Also this is what people used to read before tv. What do you think a pulp author did? Western adventures for pennies were popular. Sherlock Holmes is dressed up as literature now but was actually just a popular franchise in a mass circulation magazine. It’s like reading an old airport book.

>>20661626
0.01c

>>20658542
based

>>20661626
People quoted Aasimov and Philip K Dick. Lovecraft is another entirely separate beast. You really think this modern genre fic will be as remembered? Outside of Harry Potter pribably not. There's a reason these older authors were remembered despite making accessible, "popular" works, because you can read for understanding and entertainment in the same work. It's genius to be able to create works of such high stature in such easy to consume forms for the public. Good books were worth remembering and good books are tge only ones worth reading. Anything less is just a paper idiot box.

>>20661706
cringe

What's a bodean?

>>20661775
Soery, misread Sherlock as Shakespeare. I still retain my point especially on Lovecraft however.

>>20661782
>>20661626
Bottom line, "retain" is not a meme, that is your ignorant, decadent attention span talking.

>>20658542
Got em. I want to cum in her.

>>20661797
S.C.U.M.M.

>>20661779
ANSWER ME

>>20658357
What did he mean by this?

>>20658318
based stacy entertaining herself by reading ya fiction and simultaneously making money while /lit/cels seethe on their basket weaving forum

Mothered

>>20658318
how about this. I will not click on your link and watch some gremlin harlot.

>>20658318
How can i get a cute Booktuber gf?
What Books would i have to read beside Harry Potter?
I dont read fiction the only Books i read are History and Military Books

>>20662061
That he would read 7 books a day to her

>>20658318

>See this on the front page
>Be dyslexic as fuck
>I could read them all but remember none of it.
>Feels bad

>>20661562
sure but I'd enjoy reading less if I treated every book like I'm studying for an exam, for most books I enjoy reading them more than being able to recite them

Charlie 'Bronson' Salvador Dali, "king of the press ups and the sit ups" -- Loonyology

Possible emperor of the PUASU

Preview available on Google books

>>20662249
she's so cute bros! why doesn't she have any friends?

>>20658390
very based and the furthest as i will go in this thread cause the rest will obviously be cope

I'm working throuhg the stand and feeling like I'm slow as fuck


Do you get quicker the more you read or do I just have to skim exposition

Help me! I have AIDS!

Rabies is far scarier

>>20662258
Thanks for explaining it to me, anon

>>20658375
So you don’t read.

>>20658375
So you don’t read.

What was he even saying?

Try running with your eyes closed

>>20662343
she just has friends with benefits

>>20662851

>>20662855
Look at the effects of these lies, it’s all for fashion.
This got 200k likes on Twitter.
Really? Can no one tell none of these books have been touched?
They don’t read.

>>20662719
>>20662762
i have sex

>>20662851
>>20662855
>>20662859
with the exception of some of the stuff on the third shelf, this shit isn’t worth reading. but yes, to femoids, books are just an aesthetic.

>>20662851
>>20662855
>>20662859

Whos shelf is this?

>>20662971
@bookishpumpkins on twitter

>>20662971
>>20663022
she fucks yellow men

>>20662851
>>20662855
>they even pay extra for the hardback versions of their YA

I like money, what is the process to write a crappy YA novel and sell hardbacks?

>>20663022
>>20663030
Thnks frens

>>20662851
>took the funcos out of their packaging
lowkey based ngl

>>20658318
>>20658537
>>20662249
>>20663022

Daily Reminder this is what Woman think about the Classics of literature

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyg21pB8qRQ

>>20663321
I actually just can't watch that. Holy shit.

>>20663321
I ain't listening to over an hour of this. Can you give a quick rundown?

>>20663321
suifuel

>>20663331
>at around the two minute mark
>Discusses Tolstoy for an Hour
>Dislikes Ending
>Wont go into Details

Its honestly impressive how these two can talk for so long without saying anything at all.

I can barely read 7-15 pages/hour of Joyce or Melville. Im a brainlet i know. This woman must be a genius. I respect her.

I can barely read 7-15 pages/hour of Homer or Heidegger. Im a brainlet i know. This woman must be a genius. I respect her.

>>20663438
>>20663447
Is this a bot?

>>20663508
maybe hes just retarted

I can barely read 7-15 pages/hour of Derrida or Deleuze. Im a brainlet i know. This woman must be a genius. I respect her.

I have never finished a book

>>20663508
>>20663523
>>20663541

Okay nevermind he is defenetly a bot.

I can barely read 7-15 pages/hour of Guenon or Evola. Im a brainlet i know. This woman must be a genius. I respect her.

I could read the cat in the hat and and other childish books at that pace

>>20663683
that’s basically the equivalent of what’s she’s reading. most books she reads are marketed for 9-12 year olds.

I can barely read 7-15 pages/hour of Gadamer or al-Ghazali. Im a brainlet i know. This woman must be a genius. I respect her.

I can barely read 7-15 pages/hour of Seneca or Spinoza. Im a brainlet i know. This woman must be a genius. I respect her.

>>20658318
yeah I might watch the video if those boots were off but tough luck getting me to watch it as-is.
regards

Is there a market for somebody who isn't a tasteless retard to make book reviews on youtube? I wouldn't even expect to make any money, I'm just tired of not having anybody to talk about books with and maybe talking into a camera would satisfy that a bit
I'm conventionally attractive and good at speaking but I'm not batshit insane enough to be entertaining like Quentin or obsessed with muh tweed dark academia aesthetic aping enough to draw in tumblr girls like Waldun

I can barely read 7-15 pages/hour of Mbembe or Fr. Bulgakov. Im a brainlet i know. This woman must be a genius. I respect her.

>>20663750
yes, but expect a good portion of schizos in your audience

>>20663772
I would genuinely prefer them over the alternative

>>20663782
what kind of books would you talk about?

>>20663788
Guenon and Evola

>>20663792
you 100% will get an audience. just keep uploading once every two to three weeks, and don’t give up if you don’t get any views right away.

>>20663792
lmao that’s chudcore, don’t bother

>>20658318
>can you read 7 books a day like her
no. not even if I tried.

>>20663788
None of what I read is super obscure. I love Gaddis, Nabokov, any hipster shit pushed out by NYRB, and Pynchon. If I saw somebody regularly discussing books like JR or M&D or Journey by Moonlight I would probably listen, and I could easily see myself rambling into a camera about why a certain doorstopper is worth reading or how Pynch uses the supernatural, I make long effortposts on here about things like that all the time.
I'm not >>20663792, I don't really read philosophy.

>>20663321
Never noticed this before, but listening to people talk without actually saying anything pisses me off. I'm 5 minutes in and they haven't even said anything substantial about what they read yet. No wonder this video goes on for over an hour

>>20663818
worth a shot. try it out.

>>20658318
That girl is at my uni and everyone makes fun of her

>>20664146
I'm also trans btw

There is something primally detestable about rich little girls going to college on daddy's money, studying bullshit and developing a "career" as a "literature" "influencer". I don't even want to fuck them. All I feel is disgust

>>20664395
>implying they'd fuck a chud

>>20664395
>indoeuropean charioteer encounters matriarchical indigenous-european cult, circa 4500 BC

quads

>>20664444

>>20658318
no but i can drink 7 beers in an hour

>>20664463
i can drink 7 shots of absinthe in an hour

My coworkers are reading a court of spring and roses or something. Each nook is like 800 pages they've read 3 of them in a month and a half. No idea hoe they do it desu.
The books seems really bad. They want me to read Cresent City which seems even worse.

My brain is too advanced
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzpgqrzZ-KE

If I do nothing all day I can, but then >>20658537 becomes a problem. One time I read 3 books in a row and by the end of it I had already forgotten a good chunk of the first one

her voice is soft and warm. I don't feel judged with her

>>20658318
Depends on the books.

>>20658907
Page a minute

>>20658318
Why would you want to? This is like people who binge watch tv.

>>20660244
What zero pussy does to a mf

>>20664529
Would you listen to yourself?

>>20658318
It can't be, bros... humiliated by a woman again...

>>20659156
>This is why "waking up" from zoomer culture was both the best and hardest thing to do.
>>20659259
What the fuck are you talking about retard? I'm 19 and just read. I never read YA shit. There was never any "waking up from zoomer culture".

Fuck you

>>20663321
What these two women in particular think. Don't act like we're some kind of hive mind.

>>20658581
Just because the only reason you could ever be nice to a woman is because you want to get into her pants doesn't mean every man is as pathetic as you.

>>20658680
What's wrong with 'complicated' for 'polytropos'?

>>20665587
You did exactly what those two women did; you said fucking nothing!

>>20659259
>That you didn't have to deal with fags and trannies.
Because they were forced into the closet, not because they didn't exist. You're rather myopically looking at it only from your own viewpoint; it sucked for them.

>>20659296
Who says those are the only two possibilities?

>>20659735
The nuclear family is very much a modern thing, though, that much is indisputable. Multigenerational households were normal in pre-modern, pre-capitalist societies.

>>20662874
>but yes, to femoids, books are just an aesthetic.
Maybe to the women you hang around with. I've devoured books since before I was in kindergarten.

>>20658318
If they were not particularly thick, yes. But what would be the point to it? I would just be consuming, and not having time to appreciate what I read, which is the main issue killing modern culture.

>>20665628
And your taste in books without a doubt hasn't changed since you've started.

>>20664712
In front of a TV you can zone out. Reading at least requires some basic level of attention and effort.

>>20665617

It is one of the great objective victories for human development and overall human quality of life that capitalism broke the multi-generational household and provided mechanisms for the old to be shunted off into holding containers where the life not worth living anymore can be played out without bothering the younger.

>>20665601
I said that women are different from each other. That's a statement, if not a very profound one.
>>20665633
I was literally reading Douglas Hofstadter when I was in middle school.
>>20665640
其不孝哉!

>>20665617
This. the main reason why in many cultures parents wanted to have at least one son is that he was supposed to live at home, inherit the father's business and take care of his elderly parents together with his wife. The daughter on the other hand was expected to go live with her husband in his parents' home.

>>20665642
That whole post just boils down to the word "No", which literally means nothing. So you did in fact say nothing.
Try having an opinion, not a reaction.

>>20665657
"What you are saying is not true" is a proposition- namely the negation of the original proposition.

>>20665659
Of course a women is chomping at the bit to get into semantics.
Conjure up all the meaning you want.
It boils down to "no", you half-wit.

>>20665676
Yeah- 'cause what you said isn't fucking true. Like I said, I was reading Douglas Hofstadter in goddamn middle school. I speak four languages and bits of a half dozen more. But you can't admit some stupid femoid is your intellectual equal or, let's be honest here, superior. The idea intimidates you.

>>20665688
I've been had, haven't I?
What woman types like this. Embarrassing on my part.

>>20665688
define speak. having a2 comprehension of a language doesn’t really count as speaking a language.

>>20665691
Easy- this woman does.
>>20665693
Native in one, C1 or C2 (actually going to take a C2 level test in a few weeks, I think I'll pass but I'm not completely sure), B1 to B2 in two more. A2 in three or four more and A1 in I'm not even sure how many- I confess I'm a chronic serial dabbler, and not just in languages.

>>20665698
you are bilingual, maybe tri. also hofstadter is a pseud. who do you read now?

>>20665698
Japanese, Latin, Korean and French?
4 for 4, right?
Pretenders sicken me.

>>20665705
Currently have out of the library:
x+y: A Mathematician's Manifesto for Rethinking Gender
Woman: An Intimate Geography
The Canon: A Whirlligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science (I admit STEM is one of my weaker areas, I keep trying to work on it but, well, so many things to be interested in, only so much time.)
Also currently started reading and not yet finished:
Urban Revolutions: A Woman's Guide to Two-Wheeled Transportation
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!
I've also been reading 異国の男娼 which, granted, is smut (yaoi specifically), as well as a comic book. But at least I'm practicing reading Japanese.
How is Hofstadter a pseud?
>>20665715
Native English, C2 Esperanto, B1~B2 Spanish and Japanese. A2 French, German, Classical Chinese, and Toki Pona.

>>20665722
lol no wonder you need to brag on 4chan

Reading 21st century fiction is not really reading. Especially from female authors. You might as well spend 24 hours watching netflix

>>20665740
Why do you say that?

>>20658318
I don't trust anyone who touts high reading speeds. Books, for me at least, are about digestion rather than consumption. How the fuck do you synthesize what you're reading at that pace? I would lose all respect for someone if they told me they can read a dense novel in four hours, fuck everything about this hyper-consumptive bullshit.
gr8 b8 op, you got me mad.

>>20658390
Literally me

>>20665722
Request for you: Post your copy of Milk & Honey which is undoubtedly laying on your bedside table.

>>20665767
I had genuinely never heard of that book.

>>20665744
nothing about you is serious. if you were just some random person, it’s whatever; you’re a bit smarter than the average numb nuts. but the hubris you have to brag about the junk you read just makes you come off as the fool you are.

>>20658318
I wonder what her asshole feels like

>>20665776
I'll be honest, I don't normally talk like that. But it's late, I'm tired, and this thread has put me in a shit-talking mood. You probably shouldn't take most of what I'm saying right now too seriously. I should really be getting to bed- I agreed to help my dad out at his shop tomorrow. You probably know that feeling, where you know you need to get off the Internet, you need to get up tomorrow, but you can't force yourself to.

>>20665777
a greasy coke bottle

>>20658318
>240k views, 10k likes
How do so many people enjoy any of this inane shit?

>>20665769
You really expect me to believe such a blatant lie?
Is this your first time on this board?
Are you the woman who had her untouched shelf pics posted here?

>>20665797
Nah, pictures of my shelves would look pretty different. But I swear to God I haven't heard of it. You can accuse me of being many things but 'up to date on the mainstream anything' is not generally one of them.

>>20665800
I should add that I'm autistic if that explains anything- neurotypical women sometimes feel nearly as alien to me as men do.

>>20665800
So my second question remains unanswered still.

>>20665806
That means absolutely nothing to me.

>>20665811
No, I've been posting on 4chan since... well, since before I was technically supposed to.

>>20665815
So you'd have noticed the frequent memeing that is done on Rupi Kaur's Milk and Honey on this very board?
Which lie are you sticking with? You're spinning quite the web.

>>20665755
gg, thanks for playing

>>20658318
omdz this girl needs to have sex
infantilist little gimp

>>20665904
what kind of guys do you think she's into? nerdy literature coping incels like her or Chads?

>>20665996
she seems completely asexual or (less likely) a dyke imo

https://tattle.life/threads/ruby-granger-29-is-it-soon-yet.31322/

there's a whole forum dedicated to seething about this person

>>20666115
wow, women can be so mean to each other

>>20658318
>can you read 7 books a day like her
Do you want to know why she is a retard? Because she says she "read" 7 books.

This is not an accomplishment, because books are not about reading. They are about "understanding", "retaining", or however you want to call the process of improving through a book.

Also look at her books... I wouldn't even "read" this trash if you would pay me.

There would be a very simple test to see if she really can even read ONE book in a day.
>wait until a new book is released
>give her the book on release day and say that she has to answer short questions (like 100 in 10 minutes) about the book
I can guarantee you that she will maybe be lucky if she even gets 10 right answers.

I have seen it all the time when people claim that they "read" a book and it turned out they were just turning pages.

Also, I know literally all secret ways of reading and I can guarantee you that she reads slow af (or with nearly zero retention), simply by watching a few seconds of the video of how she "reads" the books.

If you know the secrets of reading and learning, you can instantly see when someone reads a book if he is a killer and slays the book like there is no tomorrow, or if it's a retard like this "7 quadrillion books a day" page turning.

>>20661179
lol imagine not remembering what you've read

>>20665599
>he hasn't replied
oh no no

>>20666385
Seething

>>20666385
What are all the secret ways to reading? How can I learn to slay a book?

>>20666115
23 pages of a thread of women absolutely seething. Gunna read this today

>>20659259
>thrice
ngmi

>>20665587
If you really want to prove women are different, or at least distinguish yourself from then, you won't be able to do that here.
Why? because this site is the great equializer. no face, no names, no genitals known = automatically masculine. This should be splendid to you if you really think women are equal, because all you have to do is prove your ideas are worthwhile regardless of your genitals.
But you didn't say this to prove women are different. You want validation FOR being that different woman. You're embarassing yourself trying to prove ypur point by bragging about muh languages and muh early reading (as if every other shmuck here didn't have the same story) on an anonymous paper making forum, to random sweaty people who don't care.

>>20665782
That's why you apologized here and made excuses. You feel embarassed, you want the inherent assumption that you're capably intelligent back. That's alright, I feel pity for you because I was once you. But you'll learn that there's a reason there are no women on the internet.

There are, plenty of them. They will never say they are women because it takes from their credibility. This will always be the great equalizer, where the intelligence and creativity of your ideas are the only thing you need.
If you can't do that, I'd suggest reading some more and coming back later as a new person.
Cause the truth is I love seeing other women here that simply present ideas - I know them by their typing styles and word choice. The ones who pretend they can still use their bodies to gain attention in an attempt to prove men wrong are only proving their point.

>>20666115
this is pretty funny

>>20667058
a woman wrote this post

https://youtu.be/p5FZJ6Q1ZNk
Cute. I like seeing her in her jammies and her post-shower clothes. Morning routine videos are just low-key softcore porn, anyway.
Nice voice, but boring. Wouldn't watch the rest of the channel.

>>20666115
some of these women write essays calling out everything in this girl's videos, absolutely unhinged shit

taking screenshots and bitching about her bedsheets being untucked, or mark on her clothes.

holy....

>>20666115
Jesus, this is mentally ill

>>20667200
>>20667398
they have her whole life story charted out for the past several years lol

>>20667456
I feel like a normalfag compared to these people

>>20667467
for sure, they are even charting her life out years into the future.

absolute state of women...

>>20667456
they are gatekeeping

>>20666115
What a gaggle of bitches holy shit

This shit reminds me of that girl that /lit/ destroyed and she quit her youtube channel or something.

Is it redemption time?

>>20667521
lmao which girl?

>>20667525
I don't have the image at hand but I'm sure some helpful /lit/izen can help me out.

Also, go back to /b/ for a couple of years, you fucking newfag.

>>20667528
ive been on /b/ and /r9k/ since 2014

>>20667534
And here since yesterday

>>20667534
What happened in 2014?
Do elaborate.

>>20667537
off and on since 2019, mostly to shitpost about guénon (pbuh)

>>20667538
i touched my peepee, felt ashamed, then converted to islam

>>20667539
Also known as the eternal /pol/ tourist

>>20667555
I stopped using the site during the election, but do try again

>>20658318
Probably not.
I read like 1 book a month on average, some times 2 or 3 if its smaller 100-200 page books.

I do read about 6 comic issues a day though.

>>20658375
She read Thomas Mann though.

>>20659156
>whose

>>20667568
>Death in Venice
Literally the only book by Mann braindead morons read

>>20667600
it’s also only 20,000 words lol

>>20666115
>Ruby Granger Gossip Forum
https://tattle.life/tags/ruby-granger/

>>20667851
wow, all these people are mentally and spiritually ill
is there something similar for RC Waldun though?

>>20658357
What did he mean by that?

>>20667851
Boy, they really dislike her, I was curious about their comments on "depacle" so I clicked on thread #28 and right off the bat there's someone dissecting an entire video

>>20665824
and thus the lying whore was cast from this thread, never to be heard from again.