[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 40 KB, 320x397, wut.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.2046522 [Reply] [Original]

mfw we read ayn rand in english class

>> No.2046527

>mfw we don't read in English class

>> No.2046528
File: 14 KB, 169x121, faggots.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>2046527

>> No.2046532

>mfw they sell chairman mao's book at the book fair

>> No.2046544

>>2046532

>mfw you act like that's a bad thing

Seriously, you're just as bad as the objectivists. Fucking capitalists, man.

>> No.2046557

>>2046544
Mao was a fucking idiot.

>> No.2046569

>>2046557

Go read some Kautsky and vote Die Linke you reformist piece of shit.

>> No.2046575

>>2046569
I'm an anarchist, comrade. I refuse to support tyranny under the guise of communism.

>> No.2046591

>>2046557
That's exactly how he managed to gain and stay in power in a country where they practice Klingon promotions.

>> No.2046593

>>2046575

Oh, yeah, that's a realitistic philosophy.
Anarchist Catalonia lasted, what, a week?
Back over. every anarchist I've ever met has been a university student, professor or an artist with rich parents.

Most Maoists are peasants fighting in revolutions across Asia!

>> No.2046599

>>2046593
Only because Franky Franko wiped em out. If anarchism got a good foothold it might be doable.

>> No.2046606

>>2046599

Have fun defending that revolution against the organized forces of reaction, pal.

Oh, and have funbeing rules by a tyranical shadow dictator who doesn't abide by democratic centralism.

>> No.2046603

>>2046569
Mao was nomenklatura scum. Go read some Stalin and murder the Ukrainian agricultural proletariat.

>> No.2046607

>>2046593
Most Maoists aren't "Maoists" anymore. They're rural proletarians—not peasants—and they've internalised their own proletarian experience.

>> No.2046609

>>2046603

>Agricultural proletariat.

LMAO

Go read som MARX

>> No.2046613

>>2046607

Where are you getting your theory from?
Shit? Do you just look at shit an imagine words on it?

>> No.2046616
File: 33 KB, 360x360, 13135464781641.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>2046593
As opposed to Maoism? I'll take an ephemeral paradise rooted in man's propensity toward mutual aid over 60,000,000 dead.

>> No.2046639

I'm not a Maoist but the Maoist in this thread is right about quite a bit. The peasants in Asia are just that, peasants, as defined by Marxist theory.

(I'm a Trotskyite btw)

>> No.2046659

>>2046609
"agricultural proletariat"
Go read Lenin on the Ukraine.

Actually go read Marx—he discusses OCC and mechanisation in relation to land rents in Volume 1 and Volume 2.

>> No.2046661

>>2046639
So they're feudally bound and surplus is directly extracted in the form of corvee labour and subsistance in food stuffs?

Bullshit. They're rural proletarians. Read up about the French Fish Sauce Tax in Vietnam.

>> No.2046665

>>2046616
They died because of a bullshit geneticist's bad science. Some geneticist told Stalin that he could genetically engineer super crops, and Mao hopped on bored. Massive starvation in both the USSR and the PRC was the result. However, at least Mao figured out that it wasn't working, and discontinued the program. Stalin keep going with it because his "scientist" tickled his ego.

>> No.2046667

>marxism
>2011

summertime

>> No.2046702

>>2046665
Your apologetics do not cover the deaths amongst Ukrainian agricultural workers during the primitive socialist accumulation of the first five year plan.

(Nor are they an adequate explanation for why so-called socialist democracy can allow mass death at all).

Class based critiques of the PRC and Soviet Union offer superior, materialist, explanations compared to your subjectivist idealist explanation.