[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 571 KB, 712x1024, 8B4ED3B4-D727-47EC-A0F3-503EB3DCD0F3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20412945 No.20412945 [Reply] [Original]

>rebrands Hegelianism
>doesn’t apologize

>> No.20412974

>youtube zoomer thread
Did he even read Hegel at all?

>> No.20413897

>>20412974
>Hegel
Who?

>> No.20413982

>>20412945
He was obviously Kantian, retard. But you don't read anyway.

>> No.20413985

>>20412945
Husserl was probably the most anti-Hegelian among all the major figures of 20th century German philosopher. I'd tell you to go back and reread Logical Investigations but your zoomer brain, afflicted with the mental equivalent of Parkinson's disease, will sputter and die 15 pages into volume I. Kill yourself. Sincerely, a friend.

>> No.20414019

>>20412945
>what infinitesimal mental states do to a mfer

>> No.20414029

>>20413982
>"I personally to not feel that I have been influenced by Kant in any meaningful way."
What did he mean by this, anon?

>> No.20414033

>>20413985
>inherited his phenomenal psychic states from Peirce
>who in turn often writes about how similar his views are to Hegel
>has an entire world of potentialities each containing the ultimate fulfillment, just awating synthesis
Yep. No Hegel there..

>> No.20414064

B R E N T A N O
R
E
N
T
A
N
O

>> No.20414352
File: 164 KB, 640x769, 6CE5DE9D-177B-4495-B319-78D0471A3079.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20414352

>>20413985

>> No.20414362

>>20413982
>>20414029
Husserl took a lot from Kant and Fichte. Husserliand and Husserl himself can cope as much as they want, but for anyone who knows the basic ideas of those two knows there’s barely anything novel in Husserl.

>> No.20414371

>>20414362
>Fichte
Irrelevant to Husserl (and philosophy) but for his influence on Hegel and the formation of the German state—two events which struggle for leadership in the contest for greatest disasters of human history.

>> No.20414380

>>20414371
>Fichte irrelevant to Husserl and philosophy
Read books.

>> No.20414394

>>20414380
Husserl was more influenced by the Pragmatists than Fichte.

I've read and understood more books than you have heard of.

>> No.20414411

>>20412945
I am a 36 year old with a PhD in Philosophy. I am $450k in debt and currently working two minimum wage jobs in order to stay alive. I work alongside 18 year olds and whenever they ask about my background I just tell them I've been in prison for a long time, which is less embarrassing than admitting the truth. I am probably the most well-informed Husserl scholar on the North American continent, perhaps in the world. My 1,500 page biography of his life has been rejected several dozen times. No college will take me on since they don't think Husserl is relevant, and that other applicants are therefore pushed to the head of the line. I have had 6 Husserl-related papers published in different journals and philosophical quarterlies, but have earned no money or recognition for having done so. I just moved to Abbeville, Louisiana since there is a job opening at the university in Lafayette and I decided to go all out in order to get it. But I've just found out that my application was rejected and now I'm stuck working at a Wendy's three shifts a week and a Barnes & Noble the rest of the time. I have no wife, no children, and at this point no friends I'm willing to talk to due to the shameful nature of my existence.

>> No.20414437

>>20414394
https://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_APHI_673_0421--husserl-a-reader-of-fichte.htm
https://philpapers.org/rec/FISHEF-3

>> No.20414485

not a particular author, but I love looking at the goodreads author books. they’re so fucking funny and, though they try to make poc and queer people the focal points of their story, there’s always reviews complaining that they didn’t do it well enough.
example I just found:
>Synopsis
>Alex Green is a young girl in a world much like ours. But this version of 1950's America is characterized by a significant event: The Mass Dragoning of 1955, when hundreds of thousands of ordinary wives and mothers sprouted wings, scales and talons, left a trail of fiery destruction in their path, and took to the skies. Seemingly for good. Was it their choice? What will become of those left behind? Why did Alex's beloved Aunt Marla transform but her mother did not? Alex doesn't know. It's taboo to speak of, even more so than her crush on Sonja, her schoolmate.

>Review
> a vague air of terfdom that associates womenhood intrinsically with the reproductive system and ability to have children-- while we're given this perspective by hysteria-adjacent male scientists, the trans, post-menopausal, sterile, intersex, post-hysterectomy, etc point of view is entirely invisible, much less the point of view of poor women, women of color, or immigrant women.

>> No.20414533

>a whole thread of who influenced who
>no discussion of ideas.
I guess it's true that people are either interested in the history of philosophy or philosophy itself.

>> No.20414569

>>20414437
Links are not an argument. Thus this wasn't a response. Thus my argument remains unchallenged, and thus, probationally, correct.

Cope :^)

>> No.20414573

>>20414533
Discuss him then. What are Husserl's principal contributions?

>> No.20414581

>>20414569
>link on Husserl’s article on Fichte saying how he is important is not an argument against my position that Fichte was not important to Husserl

>> No.20414586

>>20414533
In order to know why and how A influenced B one must acquaint himself with the ideas too.

>> No.20414596
File: 150 KB, 297x250, 1577476436237.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20414596

>>20414485

>> No.20414703

>>20414586
Not in the way it's being "discussed in this thread.
>>20414573
I don't really care. My comment is a dig at the kinds of people who take Husserl seriously than anything else.

>> No.20415381

>>20414581
Bingo

>> No.20415818

>>20414380
>>20414394
To be exact, Husserl gave 3 courses on Fichte, 1903, 1915 and 1918, out of ~211. Husserl *knew* Fichte, to say he deeply influenced him is just ridiculous however.
As for Hegel, the relation is that of two completely different theoretical courses which end up aligning in the very end, and only in a very general way. Husserl never gave courses on Hegel, and I do not remember seeing him referred to directly once. Even when he criticizes "the historicists", its pretty clear he's referring to Dilthey.

>> No.20415904

>>20414573
>What are Husserl's principal contributions?
The reduction.
The distinction between eidetic and transcendental objects.
The distinction between psychological and eidetic objects.
A theory of objectivity/subjectivity which does not require adherence to a particular ontological position (but certainly points you toward one, t. idealism).
A major rework of kantian transcendental idealism.
Thousands upon thousands of pages on psychology where sexuality is not even mentioned a single time, not even considered something to eventually think about.
Also, he apparently did the best sauerkraut ever.

>> No.20416336

>>20412945
Tell me how I know you have an IQ below 100