/lit/ - Literature

File: 89 KB, 988x425, 1629729677610.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon May 16 19:01:03 2022 No.20378794 [DELETED]

[Reply] [Original]

How can we fix this issue?

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 19:02:44 2022 No.20378801 >how can I make my shilling seem organic and make people on 4chan like me >I know! REDDIT SCREENSHOTS!

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 19:07:06 2022 No.20378815 File: 30 KB, 299x475, 1647342234875.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>20378801 you wouldn't get it.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 19:17:46 2022 No.20378858 >>20378794 People in the thread are reporting F. Gardner's books to Amazon for quality and formatting issues. Gardner chads...it's over. Reddit is killing him as we speak.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 19:43:58 2022 No.20378939 Is "Gardner" trolling or is he genuinely autistic/schizophrenic?

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 19:52:18 2022 No.20378964 >>20378794 Well, I guess I've finally seen it all. And can only conclude: There is truly no limit to the lengths which F. Gardner's competitors will go to to try to take down his work.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 19:54:12 2022 No.20378970 >>20378858 Gardnersisters...not like this...

Anonymous Mon May 16 19:57:11 2022 No.20378985

>>20378794
>nooo an organic grassroots movement to upvote a book I'm going INSAAAAANE
>oh the latest recommendations from Amazon and Goodreads about how cutting my dick off is the only way to rid myself of original sin of my skin colour? i guess people just love this stuff haha

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 20:01:49 2022 No.20379003 File: 3.66 MB, 498x498, 1627255466575.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >It's very likely to be him rating his own books of course.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 20:11:46 2022 No.20379044 >>20379003 Yeah reading that thread made me have an aneurysm. Redditors are really far up their asses, and just come off as very pompous sententious people.

Anonymous Mon May 16 20:57:01 2022 No.20379216

>as a former /lit/ member that wasn't a part of this particular exercise, i apologize. they're not all bad, some of the discussions on that board were fantastic and a lot of the memes/meta memes were funny, too.
>i can genuinely say the rare 1 good discussion on that board is not worth finding among the other 999 reactionary, racist, and misogynist garbage
good thing we have such great representatives on reddit to help us!

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 20:58:00 2022 No.20379218 >>20378939 He is genuinely a megalomaniac. I'm thinking about going on the IRC and asking for a rangeban because this is just getting old.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 20:59:46 2022 No.20379228 >>20379216 Lol

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 21:13:40 2022 No.20379270 File: 261 KB, 551x491, 1507297962058.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>20378794 reading that thread made me physically ill

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 21:15:46 2022 No.20379276 >>20378985 >>20379003 >>20379044 t. members of gardner's discord cult Fuck off.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 21:33:07 2022 No.20379325 >>20378794 I looked through the comments and some of you have Reddit accounts. Hello to the not one but two communist gay furries on /lit/.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 21:36:14 2022 No.20379337 >>20379216 Someone was trying to convince people that racism isn't inherently bad in that thread.

Anonymous Mon May 16 21:47:09 2022 No.20379388

>>20378794
I don't know how people can take goodreads seriously when any woke trash or pop fiction from the last thirty years have scores over ten while others have low score because "I was forced to read this in middle school" or "I don't agree with the political opinions of the author so I won't read this"

Anonymous Mon May 16 21:51:37 2022 No.20379409

>>20379388
I don't think anyone does, maybe children? It's really a site for the "layman" to express his opinion. If I want a real opinion I will read legitimate reviews in reputable publications. Otherwise Goodreads and other similar review sites are just a litmus test for the majority 100 IQ population.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 21:57:02 2022 No.20379427 >>20379409 >opinion I will read legitimate reviews in reputable publications Lol

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 22:06:29 2022 No.20379469 Why sensor a reddit username?

>>	Anonymous Mon May 16 23:55:55 2022 No.20379829 >>20379469 That's OP

>>	Anonymous Tue May 17 00:12:30 2022 No.20379880 >>20378939 He looks over 40 yo and he gave that YT interview where he mumbles and goes on meaningless tangents like an autistic kid. So idk, he's some type of neurodivergent low status mega loser

>>	Anonymous Tue May 17 00:14:05 2022 No.20379884 >>20379427 Kek

>>	Anonymous Tue May 17 00:37:18 2022 No.20379945 >>20378794 Reddit fell for le meme book. Haha. Nice one.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 17 03:42:04 2022 No.20380389 >>20379469 Because OP is a faggot who goes to Reddit and Reddit has these faggot rules that he thinks are good etiquette everywhere.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]