/lit/ - Literature

Sounds like you encountered a versed Stirnerian and got BTFO
>Not my problem

>>20149001
because whenever you get into a conversation regarding a delemma, you will inevitably become more and more specific until you need a basis like this to make any progress at all.

>explain philosophy concept
>gain better understanding by having to explaiin and articulate it clearly
>realize some gaps in own understanding that point to further research
>finish writing
>come back down to finite reality
>person you were originally talking to says "Ummm? Ok sweatie?" or "Lol idc that's not even on youtube"
>try to cause them to spontaneously combust with siddhis
>don't have siddhis yet or they aren't working today
>shrug and be glad for the opportunity for philosophical reverie anyway
>try to focus on the diaphanous gas cloud that originally asked for the explanation, long enough to say "Haha have a good day friend" and move on
>walk away still thinking about philosophy

>>20149001
It's in your nature.

>So how does this benefit me?

>>20149001
“Why should I think?” is not a trivial problem.

>>20149016
>What exactly is the point of learning this?

>>20149030
Why are people like this? Is it mainly americans?

>>20149001
>can't answer the question
>crys about it on /lit/

You got BTFO. Accept it and move on.

So, you can't answer the question except by posting a fucking frog meme? You're not half as good at this whole thinking thing as you think you are.

Either it doesn't concern them, and you shouldn't waste your energy, or it does concern them, and you should be able to explain why it does.

>>20149174
>>20149197
Not OP. Answering in text form would be rather pointless with that type of man. You have to engage in a Socratesque dialogue with them.
Whatever the case, the scenario in the OP is likely imagined.