[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 170 KB, 1080x1350, 02025AE1-1347-4ECB-814D-67D97E8A5D8E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19980339 No.19980339 [Reply] [Original]

>The war can exist because of capital; the private ownership of mode of production, land, and profits
>The military industries in the time of war get advantaged by the supply from the government
>To abolish war is to abolish capital
>The only valid war is class war

>> No.19980341

the premise is false

>> No.19980414

>>19980341
The premise is fine.

The man is not. Why not abolish capitalism? State centralized capitalism is still capitalism. A truly democratic people would end them all.

>> No.19980424

>>19980414
>A truly democratic people would end them all.

And what if this "truly" democratic people did not?

>> No.19980460

Lenin is right. If people weren't allowed to own things they'd have nothing to fight over. Of course you'd still need a strong state to ensure people don't start owning things.

>> No.19980484

>>19980339
Lenin owned 9 Rolls Royces and owned a mansion. He was the very thing he despised. A complete moron and a grifter. He didn't even a fuck about the working class; that's why supported the suppression of The Workers' Opposition. You're just the typical, poorly informed leftist who has no idea about history. You talk so much about things you know very little about.

>> No.19980497

>>19980424
They’d be bitcoiners and lose popularity to the free regions with their free economy.

>>19980460
Socialists own things, they don’t own the land. No one person should own vast amounts of land. They obviously need a place to live, and there’s debate on who decides such matters, but they do own things

>> No.19980502

>>19980414
>Why not abolish capitalism?
How would you do that? What are you going to do to stop people from operating for profit businesses and owning property? Kill them?

>> No.19980508

>>19980497
>Socialists own things, they don’t own the land.
Socialists are people with slave morality who are envious of those who have the capabilities to own things they can not with their own labor. You're narcissists and godless people who believe you have a right to demand how we live our lives.

>> No.19980520

>>19980502
You replace the system with a shared economy. No one needs millionaires much less billionaires. No one needs banks.

>> No.19980525

>>19980508
>envious of those who have the capabilities to
Steal at gunpoint and are experts at bribing politicians and lawyers. Stop being so liberal

>> No.19980537

>>19980520
There's nothing stopping you from sharing what you have with people now. I don't understand argument; you don't believe people should have the choice to determine what they share? Why do you think people taxes or donate to charity. People do enough sharing now.
>No one needs millionaires much less billionaires
Why? And, I don't even get this argument... do leftists really think people just hold millions of dollars in a bank somewhere? More so, its not even difficult for a full time worker to get a million over a lifetime of work.
>No one needs banks
This isn't true. Without banks, I couldn't get the credit I need to pay for things I want. Banks offer a service, money with a time preference like loans, and they also protect your funds.

>> No.19980542

Marxbros…I thought Capitalism developed in premodern western europe. We historicized it as to make it seem easy to attack and eliminate it, capitalism is not some eternal thing like my STUPID reactionary family (another pernicious construct of Capital) members think. The proof is that there were never any wars anywhere in the global village prior to the 1500s.

>> No.19980543

>>19980525
>Steal at gunpoint
Yeah, that's what socialists tend to do.
> are experts at bribing politicians and lawyers.
Leftists don't have the money to do much because they're just worthless and don't have the skills to make money. They blame society for their problems but not their drug abuse and laziness. Its sad.

>> No.19980550

>>19980520
>You replace the system with a shared economy.
We already have a shared economy. People voluntarily exchange their goods and labors for services. You leftists never make any sense. You search for solutions to problems that do not exist.

>> No.19980565

>>19980414
Why not introduce hypercapitalism?

>> No.19980569
File: 62 KB, 976x850, pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19980569

>>19980339
>cry about capitalists and base your world theory on class war
>co-operate with American capitalists to ensure the state doesn't collapse
The only thing it made me realise was that communism was not only a sham, but Lenin was creating a new nationality which bases itself not on common blood but on interchangeable material position

>> No.19980575

>>19980565
Because we’re trying to avoid extinction and anymore class warfare

>> No.19980580

>>19980569
The US really should be blamed for communism. The United States enriched these shit holes just so that it could bite them in the ass later. Bush gave a speech at the WTO saying China's liberalization would bring about liberal democracy. He was so wrong.

>> No.19981834

>>19980575
I don't follow. Are you schizophrenic or something?

>> No.19981850

>>19980484
>Lenin owned 9 Rolls Royces and owned a mansion.
>Lenin
You mean the Soviet Government.

>> No.19981868

>>19980339
>The war can exist because of capital; the private ownership of mode of production, land, and profits
This is probably not true. Most companies are harmed by war, hence why it hurts the stock market so much. If weapon companies are able to coerce the government into war, why are other companies not able to coerce the government away from war when they far outnumber those who would profit from war?

>> No.19982798

>>19980414
Abolishing capital and abolishing capitalism are the same thing

>> No.19982802

>>19980484
source: I made it up

>> No.19982813

>>19980414
>A truly democratic people
True democracy is impossible.

>> No.19982821

>>19980339
For most of human history capitalism didn't exist. Man lived in communal hunter-gatherer tribes where resources were shared. These tribes didn't have classes, money, or a state, and guess what? They were brutal warriors who killed one other constantly. Communist utopianism is a fantasy.

>> No.19982866

>>19980339
A woman you will never be

>> No.19982996

>>19982798
It would start with the capital, yes. Down with money.

>>19982813
A continental congress of direct democracy would be ridiculous. Luckily we don’t need whole continents to assemble, just smaller sized communities.

>>19981834
Capitalism is in the process of driving us to extinction. This isn’t schizophrenia, it’s science. What the hell is “hypercapitalism”?

>>19980550
Liberal, please. This is slavery not voluntary.

>>19980543
State socialists. They steal from thieves.

>> No.19983513
File: 199 KB, 573x875, Agamben G. - The Omnibus Homo Sacer (2017) (16).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19983513

>>19980497
>free economy
Pic related.
Daily reminder, that the notion of "economy" is stolen from theology, where it, in turn, arose solely to counterpart Gnostics' mocking of Jesus being called "kyrios" (house-manager) instead of "archon".
(As in, "Noooo! It's not poor Greek-secondary-language mistranslation! It's meaningful, yes! DIVINE ECONOMY! Invisible hand of Providence!")

>>19980339
>>To abolish war is to abolish capital
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_war_to_end_war
When you declare wars in the name of pacifism, you merely exclude your opponents from human status.

>>19980414
>A truly democratic people
Thucydides => true democracies (i.e. not Pericles-style de facto subtle tyranny) are the most warlike regimes of all

>> No.19983535

>>19982996
>What the hell is “hypercapitalism”?
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbokapitalismus

>> No.19983537

>>19980460
If didn’t have to eat they wouldn’t need to eat

>> No.19983547

>>19983537
Eating? There'll be none of that, you fashy dog.