/lit/ - Literature

>>19946771
Correction
*Pretty much explains all the social and economic problems the west is facing today

>>19946771
I own it, my writing was compared to it however I live in the west

>>19946771
Any interesting passages you'd like to share?

>>19946783
What and where did you write?

>>19946790
It has some interesting passages about women, which would be deemed mysoginist by modern society, but actually treat women better than societies today

"It is an undisputed fact that both man and woman are human
beings. It follows, as a self-evident fact, that woman and man are
equal as human beings. Discrimination against woman by man
is a flagrant act of oppression without justification for woman
eats and drinks as man eats and drinks; woman loves and hates
as man loves and hates; woman thinks, learns and compre�hends as man thinks, learns and comprehends. Woman, like
man, needs shelter, clothing, and transportation; woman feels
hunger and thirst as man feels hunger and thirst; woman lives
and dies as man lives and dies.
But why are there men and women? Human society is com�posed neither of men alone nor of women alone. It is made up
naturally of men and women. Why were not only men created?
Why were not only women created? After all, what is the dif�ference between men and women or man and woman? Why
was it necessary to create men and women? There must be a
natural necessity for the existence of man and woman, rather
than man only or woman only. It follows that neither of them is
exactly like the other, and the fact that a natural difference ex�ists between men and women is proved by the created existence
of men and women. This necessarily means that there is a role
for each one of them corresponding to the difference between
them. Accordingly, there must be different prevailing conditions
for each one in order that they perform their naturally differ�ent roles. To comprehend these roles, we must understand the
difference in the created nature of man and woman, that is, the
natural difference between the two.
Women are females and men are males. According to gynae�cologists, women menstruate every month or so, while men, be�ing male, do not menstruate or suffer during the monthly pe�riod. A woman, being a female, is naturally subject to monthly
bleeding. When a woman does not menstruate, she is pregnant.
If she is pregnant, she becomes, due to pregnancy, less active
for about a year, which means that all her natural activities are
seriously reduced until she delivers her baby. When she delivers
her baby or has a miscarriage, she suffers puerperium, a condi�tion attendant on delivery or miscarriage. As man does not get
pregnant, he is not liable to the conditions which women, being
female, suffer. Afterwards a woman may breast-feed the baby
she bore. Breast-feeding continues for about two years. Breast�feeding means that a woman is so inseparable from her baby
that her activity is seriously reduced. She becomes directly re�sponsible for another person whom she assists in his or her bio�logical functions; without this assistance that person would die.
The man, on the other hand, neither conceives nor breast-feeds.
End of gynaecological statement!
"

>>19946815
Continuing
"All these innate characteristics form differences because of
which men and women are not the same. These characteristics
in themselves are the realities that define male and female, men
and women; they assign to each of them a different role or func�tion in life. This means that men cannot replace women in carry�ing out these functions. It is worthy of consideration that these
biological functions are a heavy burden, causing women great effort and suffering. However, without these functions which
women perform, human life would come to an end. It follows
that it is a natural function which is neither voluntary nor com�pulsory. It is an essential function, without which human life
would come to a complete halt.
Deliberate interventions against conception form an alterna�tive to human life. In addition to that, there exists partial delib�erate intervention against conception, as well as against breast�feeding. All these are links in a chain of actions in contradiction
to natural life, which is tantamount to murder. For a woman to
kill herself in order not to conceive, deliver and breast-feed is
within the realm of deliberate, artificial interventions, in contra�diction with the nature of life epitomized by marriage, concep�tion, breast-feeding, and maternity. They differ only in degree.
To dispense with the natural role of woman in maternity –
nurseries replacing mothers – is a start in dispensing with the
human society and transforming it into a merely biological so�ciety with an artificial way of life. To separate children from
their mothers and to cram them into nurseries is a process by
which they are transformed into something very close to chicks,
for nurseries are similar to poultry farms into which chicks are
crammed after they are hatched. Nothing else would be as ap�propriate and suitable to the human being and his dignity as
natural motherhood. Children should be raised by their mothers
in a family where the true principles of motherhood, fatherhood
and comradeship of brothers and sisters prevail, and not in an
institution resembling a poultry farm. Even poultry, like the rest
of the members of the animal kingdom, need motherhood as
a natural phase. Therefore, breeding them on farms similar to

>>19946829
"nurseries is against their natural growth. Even their meat is artificial rather than natural. Meat from mechanized poultry farms

is not tasty and may not be nourishing because the chicks are
not naturally bred and are not raised in the protective shade of
natural motherhood. The meat of wild birds is more tasty and
nourishing because they are naturally fed. As for children who
have neither family nor shelter, society is their guardian, and
only for them, should society establish nurseries and related in�stitutions. It is better for them to be taken care of by society
rather than by individuals who are not their parents.
If a test were carried out to discover whether the natural
propensity of the child is towards its mother or the nursery.
the child would opt for the mother and not the nursery. Since
the natural tendency of a child is towards its mother, she is the
natural and proper person to give the child the protection of
nursing. Sending a child to a nursery in place of its mother is
coercive and oppressive and against its free and natural tenden�cies.
Natural growth for all living things is free and healthy
growth. To substitute a nursery for a mother is coercive ac�tion against free and sound growth. Children who are shipped
off to a nursery are consigned compulsorily or by exploitation
and simple-mindedness. They are driven to nurseries purely
by materialistic, and not by social, considerations. If coercion
and childish simple-mindedness were removed, they would cer�tainly reject the nursery and cling to their mothers. The only
justification for such an unnatural and inhuman process is the
fact that the woman is in a position unsuitable to her nature,
i.e., she is compelled

>>19946845
to perform duties which are unsocial and
anti-motherhood. A woman, whose created nature has assigned to her a natu�ral role different from that of man, must be in an appropriate
position to perform her natural role.
Motherhood is the female’s function, not the male’s. Conse�quently, it is unnatural to separate children from their mothers.
Any attempt to take children away from their mothers is coer�cion, oppression and dictatorship.

>>19946815
>>19946829
>>19946845
>>19946858
No, nigger. Just... no.

>There are inevitable cycles of social history: the yellow race’s domination of the world, when it came from Asia, and the white race’s attempts at colonizing extensive areas of all continents of the world. Now, it is the turn of the black race to prevail in the world.
What did /ourguy/ Gaddafi mean by this, bros?

>>19946971
Posting excerpts from books?
ON MY /LIT/!!??!

>>19946997
>posting autistically-long excerpts from a book as separate individual posts on thread as if anyone here will read the entirety of it
Once again, no nigger.

>>19946990
He predicted everything

>>19946815
>It is an undisputed fact that both man and woman are human beings.
He's already off the rails.

>>19947161
Your mamma is a female
Everyone who doesn't respect his mamma isn't a real man

>>19947367

>>19946858
This was my favorite passage from the book, good pick.

>>19947367
actually based

>>19946997
>excerpts
Not entire chapters faggot. If you can't summarize it in your own words alongside a blurb from the source odds are it's a shitty book and you're getting carried away (which we already know you are because you're posting propaganda written by a dictator).

>>19946794
I have a 57 page tract that I had to self publish due to lack of connections and not having direct access to my own bank account. Ill post when I get to my computer

>>19946794
well it looks like I can't post it

just paypal me five bucks
@ arseterror82@gmail.com and you can have it. i might be able to give away for free if you want. its up to you.

>>19947624
I don't have PayPal :/

>>19947578
THREE (3) reasonably sized exceprts were posted, you dopamine addled zoomer trash.

>>19947624
nigger tongue my anus

>>19946771

It's extremely stupid. You have poor taste. t. has actually read it (it's really short)

>>19947624
i hope you like gay porn you have just signed up to hundreds of sites

>>19946771
I browsed through it and it seemed really low IQ, Gaddafi tried to word some very basic ideas into some complex and interesting concept which seemed artifical to me.