/lit/ - Literature

Aristotle started it, Kant refined it, Hegel muddled it, this fag gave up.

>barges in
>makes all philosophy useless
>refuse to eleborate
>leaves

>>19797627
He is amongst many to describe limitations, and he did so quite well. We have moved beyond these limitations, thanks to men like David Bohm.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holonomic_brain_theory

No. He was tortured by the problem of external world skepticism that his system was unable to address. Leads him to write the investigations and accept a wider role for philosophy.

>>19797675
>problem of external world skepticism
what's that ?

>>19797681
I'm guessing he means skepticism on whether the external world (i.e. the world outside of your head) exists.

Jewish Talmudic tricks (which is what Wittg was engaging in) can't do shit to philosophy except for corrupting a few feeble minds.

>>19797691
Yeah that's what I mean. It was a big fixation for G.E. Moore, Bertrand Russell, and Witty when they were working together.

>>19797692
can't wait to hear what this guy thinks about philosophy.

>>19797627
Solve Philosophy ? Dood Wittgenstein did not even contribute much to it... but you can not solve it... philosophy is a never ending process...
>>19797639
It is more like Aristotle was one of the guys that started it and Kant ended it... at least for now... until someone comes up that is smarter than Kant...

>>19797855
>kant ended philosophy
lol

when was the last time a kantian conquered anything?

>>19797863
dood... Kant ended it with his problem of synthetic judgement a priori and how that can be possible...
until today nobody solved that problem or at least
wrote a better philosophy... our whole Zeitgeist is nothing but Kants philosophy...

>dude all language is meaningless lmao

>>19797890
you cannot make a priori judgement but that doesn't mean anything. so what?

>>19797627
Nope.