/lit/ - Literature

>>19796263
I don't trust this bitch for shit. Women shouldn't be touching Greece, Rome, medievalism, and Christianity. And of course, when they do, things become massive gay.

>>19796324
FALLACY!
While you can touch Greece and Rome, as they are occurent physical places in the world, you CANNOT touch medievalism and Christianity, as these are concepts.
Hence, your "argument" that women should not touch them is trivial, for indeed, half of what you mention cannot be touched at all. What you have done is say that women should not draw square circles! Perfectly absurd!
Alas, another skirmish won on the intellectual battlefield. My reputation precedes me. My artillery is logic, my cavalry is facts, my infantry is reason. You are defeated.

>>19796336
kek

>>19796336
Who let the scholastics in?

>>19796336
Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

>>19796336
this proves that /lit/ is the best board.

>>19796336
You can touch Christianity by touching a bible and church, you can touch medievalism by touching a castle and armour and sword