/lit/ - Literature

>>19713770
Yikes. Go look for Hitchen's, Harris', Dennett's and Dawkin's dicks: they need you to choke on them for a bit longer.

>>19713786
dawkins is cancelled fuck off
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/may/19/richard-dawkins-king-james-bible

>>19713791
When a third-rate diletantte Bong biologist who swam in the wake of an obese, chain-smoking, alcoholic, shamelessly social-climbing Bong career contrarian, is seen as a threat within the realm of literature, you know the West is in danger.

>>19713802
don't know what that means but ok

>>19713770
if you still think like this in 2021 you might as well just admit you hate your own life and wish you weren't born, emo faggot lol

>>19713809
Is that the title?

>>19713770
>organized religion
As opposed to what other sort of religion?

>>19713805
england bad, i presume

THE ONLY ILLUMINATED ATHEIST IS THE ONE BURNING IN HELL.

>>19713868
Personal religion. Common among the so-called secular or self described agnostics.

>>19713890

>morally reprehensible psychopath delights at the idea of people being tormented for eternity and worships a tyrant god who suffers such a state of affairs while simultaneously insisting that that god is good because his own system of morality is depraved and worse than useless

>>19713890
So, mythical.

Ah, christian revenge porn. Such lovely death cultists.

>>19713770
The Bible unironically.

>>19713890
he got the monke feet

>>19713890
>pedophile tripfag claiming others are going to hell
Can I see evidence of this "hell" existing?

>>19713868
Anyone who uses the term "organized religion" is being a duplicitous prick. Religion is a socially-organized metaphysical cosmology. Any attempt at defining a non-"organized" religion will result in either secular mental health or irrelevantly superstitious mumbo-jumbo.

>>19713942


THEY USE IT AS AN EUPHEMISM FOR: «CHRISTIANITY», AND, SPECIFICALLY: «CATHOLICISM».

>>19713942
>muh true chrch!
The term is just acknowledging the fact that there’s personal faith.
In fact, there’s a different god in each person’s head and the “organized” religions had better just be fucking happy their heretical flocks come to services

>>19713972
NO, THERE ARE PLENTY OF OTHER «ORGANIZED» RELIGIONS.

>>19713770
>CHRISTIANITY? GOSH, I HATE IT!!!!! INTOLERANT EVIL VERY PLUS BAD!.
>PHYSCHOLOGY? WAOOOW! HECKERINO'S, I LOVE IT! NOW THAT'S TOTALLY SCIENTIFIC AND RATIONAL, UNLIKE. CHRISTIANITY!!!
mental illness.

>>19713890
why does yahweh (pbuh) send me to hel? how does he even know her? isn't he married to asherah?

>>19713791
What it turns people into atheism, faster and more effectively than any atheist's argument, is getting them to actually read the bible.

>>19713981
>The term is just acknowledging the fact that there’s personal faith.

YES, IT IS CALLED: «FAITH»; THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS «COLLECTIVE OR IMPERSONAL FAITH».

RELIGION DOES NOT STIFLE FAITH; IT IS FOUNDED UPON IT.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS «PERSONAL RELIGION» EITHER.


>In fact, there’s a different god in each person’s head...

THAT IS CALLED: «DEMONIC INFESTATION», OR, IF MORE SERIOUS: «DEMONIC POSSESSION».


>... and the “organized” religions had better just be fucking happy their heretical flocks come to services


?


STOP BEING DISINGENUOUS, AND JUST DECLARE THAT YOU ARE ANTICATHOLIC & ATHEISTIC.

not a single book recommendation, just a bunch of illiterate christians coping. come on
>>19713905
>>19714001
it's boring though, and doesn't address the social aspects