/lit/ - Literature

>>19712217
>When did you realize that Scholasticism was schizophrenia
Ftfy

>>19712225
Other way around. Scholasticism was the successor of the Greeks, everything after was just an elaborate LARP.

Scholasticism is cancer

>>19712273
Then why has every school after it been so gay and retarded?

>>19712282
da joos?

>>19712235
Meh. It’s not “opposite” enough actually. It’s just schizophrenia enabling meant to fool the lazy but non-schizos

>>19712287
Thomistic realism is opposed to schizophrenia, especially compared tot he rootless idealism that followed.

>>19712295
Than how did he not turn atheist? No.

keep seething christer, no one with any intellect takes your pilpul seriously anymore

>>19712217
where would I start with it, anyhow?

>>19712307
Atheism is an explicit denial of reality. As society becomes more secular, destructive idealism gains prominence.
>>19712322
Atheists do nothing but pilpul. They learned from their Jewish masters.

>>19712328
If you are too embarassed to directly agree with the Bible and would prefer to pretend Aristotle was talking about Yahweh rather than the One of Platonism, and you live in a time and place where you must agree with the Bible in order to climb the social ladder, you can start with the Greeks and then read Aquinas

>>19712217
>Scholasticism
Cringe.

Mysticism is true.

>>19712363
Abrahamoid theology is a denial of reality because it places the real as transcendent to nature and consequently devalues all life. But what's worse, you "believe" just to negate people you despise politically, an entirely shallow and soulless form of "religion."

>>19712403
>Abrahamoid theology is a denial of reality because it places the real as transcendent to nature and consequently devalues all life.
Yet somehow pagans always end up acting like niggers and sacrificing people.
>>19712366
Scholastics were more willing to correct the Greeks than previous and subsequent philosophers were, which is why they avoided the pitfalls of paganism that even our secular society has fallen into.

>>19712217
Nah, scholastism is too boring and tiresome, speculating on word of God.

>>19712414
>they avoided the pitfalls of paganism
What does this even mean to someone who doesn't have to agree with the Bible? Like, why should I care about the mental gymnastics needed to defile Hellenistic philosophy to the point of squaring it with worshiping a volcano demon from Palestine? Again, it seems to me that the more cerebral christers were embarassed by the Bible and needed to come up with "smarter" sounding justifications, and they did so by quote mining greater—and pagan—minds.

>>19712217
But anon, Aquinas quit writing after he had a mystic experience because he felt anything he wrote would be inadequate.

>>19712437
not being able to see your feet is not a mystic experience, tommy

>>19712433
>worshiping a volcano demon from Palestine?
Why do you mindlessly repeat speculations from the Jew Sigmund Freud? The non-Chrostian mind has been made entirely kosher.

>>19712433
>defile Hellenistic philosophy
Hellenistic philosophy was a bunch of half-Eastern gobbldygook and needed Christianity to save iit from itself.

>>19712225
Say it, you dont know what scholasticism is nor have you read any

>>19712443
Why are you so obsessed with theology and gay sex? Are you one of those Seraphim Rosenblatt types?

>>19712414
Lmao what retard wrote the original post? The old germans sacrificed humans to please their Gods

>>19712448
>half eastern jibberish
>the bible is somehow excluded from this
If anything, it is even more eastern to Christianize Hellenism than not. You don't even understand the despotic idol you've erected, because he tells you he isn't an idol and you believe it

>>19712458
Someone in 2017. This guy is having an argument in another year

>>19712452
Why do pagans pretend to be white?

>>19712461
>the bible is somehow excluded from this
Correct. Because the Bible is opposed to the mystery cults that influenced the Greeks.

>>19712468
You can't answer me so you are arguing with posts you've saved before? Who cares schizo
>>19712475
What about the son of god who brings forth wine being murdered and then resurrecting? Doesn't sound like anything from the Greek mystery cults? Really now?

>>19712487
>You can't answer me
I already have. Paganism is self-defeating and far fro life-affirming, as history has shown.
>>19712487
>What about the son of god who brings forth wine being murdered and then resurrecting? Doesn't sound like anything from the Greek mystery cults? Really now?
No. It doesn't, and if you read anything beyond Jewish pop culture gnosticism you'd know that.

>>19712519
>No. It doesn't
dude that's literally Dionysius

>>19712363
>Atheism is an explicit denial of reality
But of course you’re a schizophrenic

>more trans bs
Atheism isn’t a religion. Only pseudo faiths can fill the gap, but never religion because that would negate the atheism, you schizophrenic tard

>>19712450
It’s been established already that it’s schizophrenia

>>19712519
It's a blatant rip-off of Dionysus, which is why this version of Abrahamism spread so efficiently in the Greek speaking portions of the Roman empire. If you had read anything beyond Hebrew theology you'd know that.

>>19712468
Why would you care about whiteness as a Christian?

>>19712524
>dude that's literally Dionysius
I'm not your "dude", you faggot midwit.
https://dowym.com/voices/jesus-rewritten-saviour-dionysus-vs-jesus/

>>19712531
>>more trans bs
Atheism is a belief in and of itself, in which sexual degeneracy is a tenat. You can scream "not real atheism" until you're blue in the face, it doesn't change anything.
>>19712578
Because Christianity preserves white culture

>>19712667
Your link can either affirm what he said or be completely wrong or half truths, dude.

>>19712683
No, atheism is literally non-belief. Again, some lapse into belief systems that aren’t *religion* (the word you used) such as blind following of a scientism (which is dogma around stagnating science that ought to be tested) or sociopolitical inclinationsof varying types. All not *religion*.
>sexual degeneracy
Such as the priesthood. A sickly practice that warps the mind of the human
>WHITE CULTURE
You are not a true Christian.

>>19712683
So you don't actually believe in it but just see it as a useful tool for political purposes. Which I correctly guessed earlier ITT. But now you've admitted to it and can stop pretending Tommy's pilpul matters to your "faith."

>>19712683
You're just a cringe larper.

>>19712683
you're spilling your spaghetti hard, maybe take a break

>>19712683
>Because Christianity preserves white culture
If Christianity can be separated from "White Culture" then you're eventually going to have to make a choice between White Culture and Christianity.

>>19712726
>So you don't actually believe in it but just see it as a useful tool for political purposes.
No, I affirm Christianity is true in part because it is beneficial to society, while atheism is destructive.
>>19713163
>>19713198
Get some arguments, fags.
>>19712724
>Such as the priesthood
Only if you believe Jew propaganda.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/06/14/spotlight-on-double-standards-at-the-boston-globe/

>>19713215
White Culture cannot exist without Christianity and is subordinate to it. This is why European secularism has failed.

>>19713219
Such incoherence. What is Christianity itself if not such propaganda? You both walk like ducks. Quack like ducks. In the same pond no less. Why, when one of the other ducks goes for a swim, you dabble after it like a baby to its mother. You give your children duck names. You tell them duck stories. Your "holy land" is where ducks come from. Quack quack.

>>19713219
how can something be "true in part because it is beneficial to society"? those are completely orthogonal
do you even know what true means?
and "in part"? Statements are true for reasons, not partially true for partial reasons.

>>19713323
It is true, and one of the reasons we know this is because it is beneficial.

>>19712217
anyone has a scholasticism chart?

>>19713358
>whatever benefits me is true
Good to know. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree since we don't all see the benefit in worshiping your volcano

>>19713427
>volcano
Why do pagans always use jew arguments?

>>19713227
>White Culture cannot exist without Christianity
Then why bother trying to preserve it? If White Culture is so garbage that it needs some weird Jew cult to keep it from imploding, why have any affection towards it at all? This is the tactic that the Catholic Church has taken, why do you think that you know better?

>>19712286
This, but unironically.

>>19713511
Not sure what you mean, Jews get really pissy when you point out the whole volcano demon thing. You worship Jews, so of course it would make you seethe as well, in imitation of your beloved Chosen.

>>19713511
>jew arguments
It’s the same god, ya dink.
>athishit is da jewz!

>>19713219
You're even obsessed with Jews and tries to lump neopagans with them, lol. The absolute state of Christianity in the West.

>>19713227
>White Culture cannot exist without Christianity and is subordinate to it.
Imagine believing that only the European peoples exists without autochthonic ontology, a self-evident being, and that he has to justify his own axiomatic existence by a fake national epic of the least of the Semites, the then-irrelevant Jews.