/lit/ - Literature

I am... bisexual

>>19679057

>>19679057
>they fucked some man once, therefore, they're gay rather than bisexual

>nooooooooo, think about le human race!!!

>>19679057
Boy fuckers will never get the glory they seek. They will always be the perverted fucks that play around in their own shit and piss. Pic related will be their end 8/10 times if the GRIDS don't get them first

>>19679070
>gay rather than bisexual
Literally the same thing

>>19679070
pointless anachronistic distinction, the point is that they were not exclussively-heterosexual cavemen

>>19679068
What are you even trying to say here, ya anarchist!

>>19679090
Cavemen weren't "heterosexual". Nobody was heterosexual until the 19th century.

>>19679057
Is there biological women HERE????

>>19679068
Y'all make less than straight couples

>>19679096
It’s an invitation to the “straight sisters”
She’s a yuri character

>>19679101
No but we have trannies>>19679068

>>19679106
If you think this is about female "homosexuality" then you haven't been paying attention.

>>19679101
Yes. I met such a girl irl once

>>19679057
What are Erasmus and Flaubert doing there? Shakespeare being gay is also a freshman meme.

>>19679114
You don’t know what this series is

>>19679115
>Yes. I met such a girl irl once
Such a frightening experience.
Do tell me more!

>>19679090
that's not what you're selling. you're selling homosexuality.

>>19679057
homosexuality is bad
idc if some Romans molested little boys

>>19679106
What do you think about the Mount Athos excluding what they consider women from their section of the mount.
Human Rights violation?
What about their rule of maximum of 100 orthodox christians and 10 non Orthodox per day can visit?
Should we bring a group of 5 ftm and 5 mtf trans people to apply and get rejected so that the international community can pay attention to this grave issue? Hopefully Greece or the EU would be forced to take control of those backwards religious zealots!

>>19679144
No I'm not.

>>19679158
Buttcunt was right. Women are masterbaiting more than ever.

>>19679158
You’re confused

>>19679167
Yes, you are.

>>19679193
Ok now but really what do you think about it?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Athos

>>19679122
Erasmus:
>While at Stein, Erasmus supposedly fell in love with a fellow canon, Servatius Rogerus,[25] and wrote a series of passionate letters in which he called Rogerus "half my soul," writing that "I have wooed you both unhappily and relentlessly."[26][27] This correspondence contrasts sharply with the generally detached and much more restrained attitude he showed in his later life. Later, while tutoring in Paris, he was suddenly dismissed by the guardian of Thomas Grey. Some have taken this as evidence of an illicit affair.[28] No personal denunciation was made of Erasmus during his lifetime, however, and he took pains in later life to distance these earlier episodes by condemning sodomy in his works, and praising sexual desire in marriage between men and women.[29]
Flaubert:
>Work hard, try not to be too bored, don't copulate too often, conserve your strength: an ounce of sperm lost is worse than ten pounds of blood. By the way, you ask me if I consummated that business at the baths. Yes—and on a pockmarked young rascal wearing a white turban.
The letters of Gustave Flaubert p. 121

>>19679195
But I'm not though...

>>19679057
>Shakespeare
There's no conclusive evidence he was a fag.

>>19679198
Not much. Just religious books.

>>19679208
Are you not OP? Apologies if you aren't.

>>19679211
He wrote 126 poems about ranting and raving about how beautiful some boy was

>>19679217
I am OP.

>>19679201
so when Flaubert bragged about fugging turkish prostitutes...he meant boys?

>>19679223
He was bisexual he did both

>>19679201
>he took pains in later life to distance these earlier episodes by condemning sodomy in his works, and praising sexual desire in marriage between men and women.
God Bless him :)

>>19679215
Ok somehow you're more reasonable to a real life comment on YouTube that unironacally believe and advocated for what I ranted at the beginning.
Good you I respect you some more

>>19679220
Then, you are indeed selling homosexuality. The graph is pretty clear.
>>19679227
So not a homosexual yet he's on the graph.

>>19679233
I didn't make the graph.

Lord Byron fucked his half-sister :^|

>>19679247
and made her pregnant.

>>19679233
the graph is a defence of homosexual eros not identity monsieur

>>19679262
My post is not about identity at large but about sexuality. All the quotes and little stats mention homosexuality, not eros.

>>19679275
Sexuality doesn't exist. Everyone is "bisexual". Read Foucault.

>>19679280
>Sexuality doesn't exist. Everyone is "bisexual". Read Foucault.
The faggot is surelly NOT biased, right?
What kind of agenda could he have, afterall?

>>19679368
>What kind of agenda could he have, afterall?
Dying of AIDS for one.

>>19679368
>ad hominem
Explain how he's wrong then. Go on!

>>19679368
Foucault was based. He is the foremost philosopher of the Right.

>>19679375
>Explain how he's wrong then. Go on!
Explain me why he's right and maybe I might give his book a try. What about that?
You're the one who have to proof something (burden of proof).