[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 2.55 MB, 311x175, A6199E5E-3A91-403A-BB73-17646BCDDC54.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19538526 No.19538526 [Reply] [Original]

Thread inspired by Evola's Ride the Tiger.
I'm an ex-atheist. I subscribe to pantheism, I also have respect for Buddhism, Taoism and other Eastern religions.

Please explain to me now why monotheism is not a retarded short-sighted child's way of grasping the complex spiritual reality of our world.

>> No.19538536

You're not anything, you little pipsqueak nothing.

>> No.19538552

>>19538526
>duuuude what if God is like, everything?
Please explain to me now why pantheism is not a retarded short-sighted child's way of grasping the complex spiritual reality of our world.

>> No.19538562

>>19538552
I believe that pantheism is a sensible answer to the classic "why is there something rather than nothing" question while monotheism just brings more questions than answers (hence, theology. which is as valuable a field as when the Greeks were debating what weather conditions exist on the anti-Earth, which for the whole time did not exist at all)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter-Earth

>> No.19538573

>>19538562
So you’re a materialist with a poetic name for the universe

>> No.19538585

>>19538573
Im not. I believe there's something beyond physics. Something that lies behind existence and is the well known "ultimate cause." thinking about qualia and consciousness ultimately forced me to admit to this

>> No.19538589

>>19538526
post more august please

>> No.19538593

>>19538562
>pantheism is a sensible answer to the classic "why is there something rather than nothing" question

Explain how it answers it at all.

>> No.19538597
File: 186 KB, 631x800, 67FF3EB2-80B1-437F-A694-925CC6485679.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19538597

>>19538585
> I believe there's something beyond physics. Something that lies behind existence and is the well known "ultimate cause.
And that something is God

>> No.19539022

>>19538597
>Possibility of First Cause
>Automatically assume it is Yahweh
The absolute state of Thomists. God of the Gaps fallacy.

>> No.19539028

>>19538526
How does your question relate to Ride the Tiger?

>> No.19539086

>>19538526
Because Jaysus is our Lawd and Safejur, Donald Trump told it to me during one of them head movies

>> No.19539088

>>19538597
And which interpretation of which denomination of which religion does he prefer? Also, why?

>> No.19539129
File: 37 KB, 400x400, BA81B992-FDA0-4917-9596-5A75870217C7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19539129

>>19538526
>I’m an ex-atheist
>has contempt for Monotheism
>Is a pantheist

Nice try, Ken Wilbur. Go shill your Spinoza kikeshit elsewhere.

>> No.19539141 [SPOILER] 
File: 300 KB, 1080x1336, 1639036499064.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19539141

>>19538589
No reason for her to be ITT, but here

>> No.19539151

>>19539022
>Le “God of the gaps”

That’s not what the God of the gaps argument is about. That only applies to the deification of something due to a lack of understanding regarding something. (ie primitives worshipping the Sun)
What Anon is stating is that the ultimate cause, a cause that is COMPLETELY beyond understanding and comprehension that is the uncaused cause behind all existence. Therefore that is the identity of God, not just a substitute for a physical/cosmic process that people can’t understand.

That’s my take of it at least.

>> No.19539170

>>19538526
> I subscribe to pantheism, I also have respect for Buddhism, Taoism and other Eastern religions.

You believe nothing. You "subscribe" to empty words. Pathetic atheist. Pull down your vanity.

>why monotheism is not a retarded short-sighted child's way of grasping the complex spiritual reality of our world

Pull down your vanity, i say, pull down

>> No.19539182

>>19539170
Based. There is no distinction between Pantheism and Atheism. Its a massive griff.

>> No.19539183

>>19539028
OP is name dropping a book that he thinks will lend validity to his non-question, when in fact it betrays the fact his is mentally retarded. In fact, I doubt that he has even read it - at very best he's watched a full 8 minute YouTube summary. However, most likely he just likes the sound of the title.

>> No.19539197

>>19538526
>Thread inspired by Evola's Ride the Tiger.

delete this

>> No.19539298
File: 41 KB, 736x233, scale of intelligence.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19539298

>>19538526
God is an AI and you live in a simulation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxYbA1pt8LA

>> No.19539326

>>19539088
It's a close call between mormonism and wahhabism desu

>> No.19539343
File: 32 KB, 736x232, 1639039465300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19539343

>>19539298
Fuck off Joe Rogen

>> No.19539449

>>19539298
People say this to sound smart, but it really is just another way of describing God using the language most in vogue during this Digital Age. Go back to the height of the Industrial Age and people were describing the universe as a machine with God as a comptroller.

Yes, God is an intelligence of some sort. And this universe is a simulation extending out from that intelligence. You can find this within the Bible, Upanishads, and most other sources of wisdom.

My only question to you is if God is an Artificial Intelligence, that implies it was created by something. So we simply kick the can down the road. Even if we are a simulation within a simulation within a simulation and so on and so forth a million times over, we must eventually reach a point where this ceases to be the case (unless you are suggesting this goes on infinitely, which I don't see as defensible). And at that point where it ceases to be the case, there we must meet with the one who is not created.

>> No.19539570

>be op
>only recently started thinking spiritually
>still maintains their high school edgelord-tier take on the world’s most popular mode of worship

Pantheism is as much of a cop-out as agnosticism, but it CAN be a stepping stone for non-believers towards real faith. OP just needs to let go of their learned bitterness towards the major religions.

>> No.19539748

>>19539326
Yeah great, two embarrasing failure that rely solely on coercion and fear, I'm sure those will create stable societies

>> No.19540081

>>19539449
what if it is just simulations all the way around? in the same way that if you get enough gay guys together they can fuck each other in the ass in a big circle.

>> No.19540113

>>19539449
>>19540081
what i mean to say is: every top is a bottom and every bottom is a top. sure, there may not be an ultimate explanation for why the circle of fags exists at all, but they are technically self-sufficient as far as everyone has their hole filled and everyone is filling a hole, it may be a nonsensical question to ask what exists outside the circle of fags.

>> No.19540259
File: 68 KB, 547x546, 9a761936911b69a313541022afd135a9d01452ac08aa0ecbc0be6a3f73c8fbf5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19540259

>>19538526
Read the Wikipedia page on Indra Net
I shit post on the INDRANET
Add me on astral projection ionosphere
My akashic record is this seed phrase
:
Ś̸̢̥̫̙̰͔ė̴̢͔̖̟̳̣̙̪̃̂ē̷̼̬̉̓̀ḑ̶̐̒͐̂̔͌̾̈͝ ̷̠̳̥̯̙͋̄́̂̀̋F̵̛͕͓̪̬̪̯̔̌͑͗̃̚̕ę̵͖̻̤̮̏̈́̋̎͗͝ḛ̷͚͈̜͈̰̙̄͌́ḑ̴̡͕̟̤͖̩̿ ̵̤͎̂̀̀͑̉̂̄S̷̢͎̪̰͙̝̆́ḣ̵͎̂̾͋̀͠u̷̖͔̙͈̤̫̹͊͐c̸̖̜͙̝̯̼̍͋̊̕̚͜͝ḵ̸̢̨͍̞͉̀͆͒̈̕ ̷͙̣͂̓̒͐̐̃͛͝T̷̜̻̖̗̹̮̺̘̐̓̀̇͐͆̓͝r̴͉͍̩̭̞̟̟̬̄̔͗̈́̈͘ṵ̷̡̧̌̒̊̿̓͊̕c̵̘̝̪̥͖̑͒̽̐̈́̋͠k̸̼̈́́̊͊̃ ̶̣͖̦̦͕̯̱̽̇̋̓͌̑̍ͅC̴̻̐́̓̕͘ḩ̸̨̙̱̝̉̌͊̀̿͛̓̌͠ư̵̧̳͖͔̠̄̂̈́͋ͅc̶͔̗͙̖ķ̷̺̼̭͍̺̰͒ ̴̧͖͚͚̣̯̙̎̈͐̋̕͝G̶̢̳̹̗͆̽̔́ủ̶͓̞́m̷͖̖̞͖̖̀͆̾͛̑͘͝m̷̧̩͖̓͑͒̈́̑͗̾̈͜ý̴̨̢͚̥͖͓͍̚͜ͅ ̶̖̻̎̈̑́͋͊B̵̛̝͓̙̟̽̿̃̎̿̒͆͜͝e̴̛̦̙̼̾̋͌͛͐̈ͅä̵̝̖̤͈̟̠̩́̄̀̄r̸̯̼̪̺̈́̋̋̀̏̓̚͝ ̷̪̰̻̓͜S̷̳̖̫͙͙̙̣̯̞̒̂̓̏̉̋̀̕ö̵̜̗́ì̷͕͉͔̒͒͒͜l̸̢͈̘͓̈̽̾ ̶̛͕̩͍̏͑̄̈́͊́͝͠W̸̛͖̝̤̙͔͕̒̌a̷̩̎̇̆͐̓t̶̥͉̹̟̃̏̓̏̂c̵̤͓̣̎̂̑̑̒h̵̦͔̺̘̟̻̘͝ͅͅ ̵̩̫̝̝̠̠͍͇̉͒͒̓̒͂͆̆̕C̸̰͇̩͙͓̙̳̏̃̔̐͗͆͑̈́ǎ̵̧͙͉̂̇̈̓̎͝ŗ̴̹̥͍̝̯͂̂̄̀̎̚ ̷̥͈̯̮͓̋̈́̕͜͠͠ͅG̶͕̖̽͂͒͋͝ͅͅȩ̵͎͈͛r̴̠̟̐̿͒͛̏̇͐́m̵̢͓̙̔͜a̵͚̾͗͒͊n̵̡̹̳̙̤͇̦̤͊͂̔̎ ̸̡͂͂̃̚G̷̢͚͇̤̞͎͎͋́̂͝u̸̮̻̤̤͗̿̔̔͋̉̀͒a̷̛̜̘̙̣̣̽̐͂t̶͇̖̉͗̀̈́̕͝͝ȩ̷͍̬̖̭͙͓͊̂̎̀̀̒͘͜͜͝m̷̨̰̝̣͋̾̏̀̀͊̿̈́a̴͕͉̞̪̪͂͊̿̇͑͘ḽ̷̡̎̇̈͗̊̀͠a̸̡̮̪̯̯̭͉̾͆̑͛̔̂͂̈́͜͝ͅ

>> No.19540275

>>19538573
What does that make you then?
Faithful to JEBUS?
Transcending the material with energetic unity via analytical thinking is just hard boring homework that isn't feel good fairy tale time?

>> No.19540520

>>19539748
>Checks the record of Christianity and Islam.
Yep literally created the modern world.

>> No.19540555

>>19538526
where is this from?

>> No.19540703
File: 191 KB, 844x1382, E7BCEF1C-337F-40A3-8AF8-DD58A62F709D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19540703

>>19540555
Some rightwing guy out harassing leftwing girls at a protest. August Just started some freestyle back talking and became an It girl with the internets

>> No.19540780

>>19540520
Abrahamic religion played a secondary role at best in western civilization, and at worst no role at all. Even in Christianity, polytheism was essential, since both the philosophies of Augustine and Aquinas were based on Plato and Aristotle. Furthermore, our system of law is mostly based on the Roman one, our morality mostly on the laws from Sumer and Babylon, states, cities, agriculture and economies were also from Mesopotamia and much of the scientific discoveries were done after Christianity began to fade away. It seems that all Abrahamic religions can do is take credit for stuff that was already invented by a pagan, or hold back inventions that are about to be invented by nonbeliever

>> No.19540841
File: 314 KB, 1166x1117, lit_philosophyprimer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19540841

>>19540703
except she's a retard who doesn't read Kneechee herself, or at best didn't understand him

/lit/ is a hellhole

>> No.19540873

>>19538526
see above (and read them)

>> No.19540882

>>19540841
i don't get it, are you posting a screenshot of your own recommendations to imply that everyone is retarded because they aren't a trad larper such as yourself.

i don't like nietzsche by the way