/lit/ - Literature

>>19417139
Because you probably lack any world experience and/or empathy so have an inability to write interesting characters without trash tv tier shock value plotlines. Just a guess though.

>>19417165
I'm noticing you also don't have any convincing arguments outside of a see-through attempt to paint yourself as /lit/s old world-weary experienced twenty-something trope. Try again.

>>19417183
That the girl will have an inability to have healthy sexual relationships with her peers when that time comes.

What is wrong with you?

>>19417183
sorry pedo guy, you really did ask for it

>>19417206
A girl shouldn't be having sex with her "peers". She should be having sex only with her husband (who is at least twice her age).

>>19417139
Because your character is selfish and can only think of himself and only in the moment.

For example;
>The guy can't love her forever. Soon she will grow up and be unattractive to him. This would surely cause strife in their relationship.
>Is the man loyal? Maybe in your story he is, but would it really be believable for somebody like him - who is so attracted to that body type - to stay loyal?
>The girl hasn't even hit puberty yet. What is it this doing to her state of mind? What will she be like when she grows up and enters adulthood, after experiences like this? Does your character acknowledge this, or does he even care?

>>19417216
>sorry for getting heemed
Delicious cope.

>>19417231
>>The guy can't love her forever.
Why not?
>somebody like him - who is so attracted to that body type
Pedophilia is primary sexual attraction not a sole sexual attraction.
>>The girl hasn't even hit puberty yet.
The average age of menarche is 11.

bait thread nevermind

>>19417206
>That the girl will have an inability to have healthy sexual relationships with her peers when that time comes.
Why not? Do the high school girls who get passed around by Chad and Tyrone also have this inability?

>>19417251
It's not bait, he clearly really thinks this kek. I have to hand it to him, it is about the only edgy thing left to argue about, along with the holosneed maybe

>>19417256
meh i thought he really was making a novel or something and wanted advice but now i can see he's just a pedophile who wants to argue for some reason

i don't get it

>>19417251
>>19417256
>I have no arguments so it must be bait
At what point do you wonder why you're letting Christian feminists tell you what you are allowed to be attracted to?

>>19417263
He wants reassurance that hes not a monster, which is only natural.

>>19417269
surely he can go somewhere else for that? /tv/ is full of these kinds of people, why does he do it on /lit/

>it's yet another thread of /lit/ mid-wits being incapable of answering so they talk to each other to save face
these are the best threads on this board
>>19417139
there is no answer that doesn't revolve around moralfaggotry

>>19417139
Well now something that jumps out to me personally is a contradiction in terms. This grown man is having a "sexual" relationship with a prepubescent girl, but one who is prepubescent has, by definition, not reached sexual maturity, and therefore cannot participate in a sexual relationship. So how can this relationship be? It seems quite likely to me that the girl is being imposed upon by a (disgusting, depraved) pervert and such interactions are known to result in significant mental trauma.
There's your argument, but you don't need strict arguments to dislike pedophiles, as the practice is taboo. It's curious that the friend who's trying to convince the other feller is trying to do so at all and hasn't simply given him a crack over the head and reported him to the police.
It's also curious that you're bothering to write this story at all. Nabokov wrote the le plausible deniabilerino pedo novel already. If you're trying to shock people you're out of touch, and if you're trying to write fetish-fiction the arguments and rationality of the sort you're requesting shouldn't be a priority.
Oh but now I've actually read your post and see that you're not asking for arguments at all but rather asking why you can't come up with arguments for this friendly feller to use. Well the obvious answer is: you're stupid. It didn't take me a second to think up the obvious non-taboo argument and it shouldn't have taken you more than a minute either.
I hope my post reply has been useful for your question, your welcome.

>>19417288
>one who is prepubescent has, by definition, not reached sexual maturity, and therefore cannot participate in a sexual relationship
I have some really, really bad news for you fren.

>>19417231
You don't have to be a hardline literal dsmv5 pedophile to date an 11yr old.

since we're all here does anyone know a good way to clean my monitor? it's dirty as fuck and i don't want to ruin it on accident

>>19417288
>but one who is prepubescent has, by definition, not reached sexual maturity, and therefore cannot participate in a sexual relationship.
Anon, I...

>>19417284
>there is no answer that doesn't revolve around moralfaggotry
This is the truth as much as people don't want to admit it.
>b-but y-you'll d-d-damage the g-girl!
Railing an 18 year old who is so drunk she can barely stand in a bathroom stall damages her too but nobody gives a fuck because she has passed the magic day when the moralfags lose interest.

>>19417300
>you don't have to be faggot to suck a dick, regularly, in a committed homosexual relationship

>>19417139
is this really a character that you’re writing about

>>19417324
>pulling out the homophobia now
nice "argument"

>>19417330

>>19417323
They definitely do moralfag about that scenario, they now consider it rape

>>19417305
use some wet wipes if you've got them, they're not wet enough to actually damage the screen, if you dont have any just get a cloth and wet it with a very small amount of water and wipe the screen it'll be fine. i found that glass cleaner spray like windex works brilliantly, again just put a small amount on a cloth and wipe it. i hope this helps fren

>>19417253
Yes. Look at statistics on relationship outcomes for number of previous sexual partners and age of first sexual contact.

>>19417332
>homophobia
choke on a dick, faggot

>>19417298
>>19417314
Your implication is that a sexual relationship is any relationship with sexual motivation from either party? I myself beg to differ.
Saying someone prepubescent can have sex is like saying gay people can get married: you need to forget what words mean in the first place.
Sex: reproductive dimension of a person. Sexual relationship: relationship relating to said dimension.
If that dimension hasn't developed to maturity, it cannot function proper, and so cannot exist but in common stupid-person parlance (verbally). But if you acknowledge meaning to how stupid people speak you'll find yourself becoming like them. That's why you never say gay marriage is possible and you say you can't have a sexual relationship with anyone prepubescent. It's predatory paraphilia - on a linguistic front!
I hope I have properly understood your implication and that this reply sorts out your confusion, your welcome.

Bruh, 11 yos are unattractive irl. If it was 14 to 16-year-olds then you may have a point

>>19417365
>Saying someone prepubescent can have sex
There is nothing funnier than watching a /lit/ 100 IQ pseud tying himself in knots trying to deny reality. Is your contention prepubescent people cannot have sex despite tens of thousands of hours of video evidence proving the exact opposite?
>>19417365
>your welcome.
You're welcome.

>>19417323
>people who say things are bad are moralfags
You are a fool. How can you say anything is bad without being a moralfag?
>appeal to societal normalcy
Again if your judgment is as stupid as the judgment of society then you are a complete buffoon... and by your own admission!
I hope you'll stop entertaining the vanity that you can argue, your welcome.
>>19417382
Again, I ask you to think of what the word sex means. Two homos can sodomize each other but is that sex? Not really. Just because they're deriving pleasure from their sexual organs no sir. What about lesbian sex? I myself to not observe lesbian pornography so I cannot state for certain how they do this but I assume it's simply mutual masturbation without even the superficial similarities of male gay sex. So you see, just because a thing resembles another thing or involves similar things does not establish equivalence. Nice try!
I bet you learnt your grammar from Nabokov; you'd do well to read more wholesome authors! I hope I have clarified your confusion, your welcome.

>>19417323
Having sex with a person who's much drunker than you is also non-consensual, it's rape in many jurisdictions (including mine).

Drawing the line at 18 is indeed arbitrary, but a line must be drawn at some point between 11 (clearly unable to consent due to insufficient brain development) and 25 (fully developed adult brain). The uncertainty about where the line is is obvious from the difference between jurisdictions.

This is the part where you try to gotcha me that 11 is legal in Nigeria, to which I respond that the opinions of Nigeria's lawmakers mean less than nothing to me.

Anyway, to directly answer OP's (moronic) question -
>I can't come up with any convincing arguments that don't revolve around "it hurts my feelings to know this is happening," why is that?
Because every argument about anything can be reduced to that absurd caricature. You haven't BTFO'd morality just by identifying it. The arguments against murder are the same - it's a bad thing to do.

>>19417413
>all these words to say nothing at all
Incredible.

>>19417414
>gotcha
I'm going to give you a pass on that this time.
>the opinions of Nigeria's lawmakers mean less than nothing to me.
Oddly the opinions of moralfaggots mean less than nothing to me so we have common ground.
>it's a bad thing to do.
>It's bad because it hurts my feelings
I have no doubt you could give me a long list of objective reasons why murder is bad outside of my feelings get hurt when it happens.

>>19417435
You have been so defeated by my mental soundness that you plug your ears. Sad!

>>19417165
fpbp

>>19417459
100 IQ midwit on serious damage control.

>>19417183
>>19417165
theyre both right

>>19417413
>Is your contention prepubescent people cannot have sex despite tens of thousands of hours of video evidence proving the exact opposite?
This is a yes or no question not an excuse for you to ramble semantics like a lost rabbi. You're welcome.

>>19417457
>I have no doubt you could give me a long list of objective reasons why murder is bad outside of my feelings get hurt when it happens.

Honestly I can't - give me an argument against murder that doesn't equally apply to raping (sorry, "dating") a little girl? I'm now genuinely curious what you think the difference is.

>>19417288
>Nabokov wrote the le plausible deniabilerino pedo novel already.
Nabokov loathed moralising in his works, but it's impossible to deny that Lolita is eventually a condemnation of pedophilia - Humbert Humbert concludes that the transcendent beauty he saw in nymphets is nothing more than his personal delusion, and that he eventually did nothing but ruin a young life with his pampering and perversion (though he still loves her, if out of habit and his own helplessness), with Dolores herself rejecting her nickname of Lolita, and eventually dying in giving birth to a child of another man.

If that doesn't dab on lolicons, I don't know what does.

>>19417505
>Honestly I can't
I don't have an X big enough to press. Here's an easy one you murder some random nigger who was two years away from discovering the cure for cancer.

>>19417497
>this is a yes or no question
Yes. (my answer to the first question)
No. (my answer to your question, since you are being pedantic)

>>19417515
So what is your argument in essence, that murder can rob society of some kind of future utility? That seems kind of abstruse, since any action could have that effect. Maybe you bought the last donut from the store, robbing that random nigger of the epiphany that led to him curing cancer. Maybe you raped his little girl and he couldn't concentrate on his work. Try again - why is murder bad?

>>19417413
>>19417365
lmao sex with a barren woman isn't sex either then
Or sex with a sterile man

>>19417533
>get an easily understandable answer
>start seething
How cute.

>>19417506
Perfect summary, but since OP is too stupid to read or understand your post, let alone Nabokov, I don't hold a lot of hope

>>19417539
>backed into a corner
>"huh huh you're seething"
troll better bro

>>19417540
I don't know anon he seems to be blowing you the fuck out up and down the thread and your response is well this happened in a fictional story LOL I win.

>>19417543
>backed into a corner
Anon you got a very easily digestible answer I could have given to a mental impaired person and started talking about donuts to cope. Having sex with someone does not forever remove anything they and their entire line of descendants had the potential to achieve from humanity. But keep seething it's funny bro.

>>19417545
>this happened in a fictional story
You do know what happens to pedophiles in reality, right?

>>19417139
Pedos don't marry their victims, so you'll just damage her and turn her into a roastie.

>>19417538
Haven't you seen that clip of obama talking to that negro? They're debating about gay marriage and the guy Obama's talking to refutes this argument. IDK how to find it and I'm bored of explaining on this thread which does not seem to be about literature.

>>19417558
>You do know what happens to pedophiles in reality, right?
They tend to get elected to the Presidency, run the Judiciary, dominate media and make the laws that you follow like a good boi?

>>19417139
They will never have a relationship since the girl will grow to resent him for her stolen youth, not to mention if he's a dyed-in-wool pedophile, he will not be attracted to her as she ages. He is expressly stealing her innocence.

>>19417568
>Haven't you seen that clip of obama talking to that negro?
>listening to two niggers talk
I have not seen it and I will not be seeing it.

>>19417575
OP has already established that he is utterly unconcerned with the actual or possible effects on the girl, only "objective" harm done to society, as anything else is "moralizing"

>>19417621
She will be a useless woman in her prime childbearing years and effectively become a tax drain and either not produce children at all, or date a nigger and produce quadroons who are also useless. OP is beyond retarded if he doesn't see the societal harm, and that's why nobody will read his shitty Lolita fanfiction.

>>19417575
>since the girl will grow to resent him for her stolen youth
This is nonsense.

>>19417621
>OP has already established that he is utterly unconcerned with the actual or possible effects on the girl
where

>>19417139
>Instantly adored by every little girl he meets
That's an even bigger cope than using Chad to describe yourself

>>19417652
>getting angry at a virgin chad meme
lol do you see some of yourself in the virgin?

>>19417648
In what sense? Read some accounts of pedophilia from the child's perspective, and this is one thing that comes up repeatedly. They are almost always deceived into the sexual relationship, and this is why that is a common remark made by victims.

>>19417645
>OP is beyond retarded
>nobody will read his shitty Lolita fanfiction.
Anon.

>>19417671
Do go on.

>>19417139
Here are some biological problems: early adolescent females aren't fully developed; specifically, there's a high risk of damage to the vagina when penetrated by a fully developed adult penis. Furthermore, pregnancy is risky as fuck for adolescent females; it's the leading cause of death for girls between the ages of 15 to 19. At the age of 11, the girl probably hasn't undergone menarche yet, but if she has, the risk of eclampsia and lethal infections during pregnancy are sky-high, and if she successfully carries the baby to term, the risk of delivering a preemie or a child with congenital birth defects is through the roof. This risk will remain high until her late teens.

As for social factors: our society has no support structure for young mothers. If the father abandons her, and statistically speaking, there's a good chance he will, she and the baby are fucked. And that, in turn, fucks society; the mother becomes dependent upon welfare and other social programs, and delinquency and criminality will become risk factors for the offspring as he or she matures.

And as for moral arguments: sometimes we must put aside our wants, desires, urges, or whatever for the sake of others. A sexual relationship with an 11 year old benefits no one, least of all the girl herself, and raises serious risks. It's pure, selfish hedonism.

>>19417675
Do you honestly believe OP has the slightest intention to write a story about pedophilia?

Op, stop excusing your paraphilia and seek help

>>19417721
So, how are you liking your first day on 4chan?

>>19417716
OP won't care since he's a spergo schiz but I really appreciated this post.

>>19417220
You fuckers are so dillusional. Why would a little girl want to date some older creep, its not like she would care about your BS statistics. She would run away. And imagine a boy here age… “oh Timmy your not entitled to date this girl your age but some overweight fucker twice your age sis because of some made up 4chan shit.” You live in false reality, your a creep. Saying pedophilia is justified because people married of younger centuries ago is like saying marrying close relatives is. Humans have gotten taller in the past few centuries, things change, and it is creepy to want to date a young girl.

>thread full of faithless fools
Can little girls orgasm? Yes, they can. This is a gift from God Himself to His children. If God has ordained pleasure for little girls then it is not for man, full of ego and ignorance, to claim to know better than the Lord. Man should strive only to acquiesce to the will of God.

>>19417737
>n-no u-u
Anon you're the absolute retard who wrote
>nobody will read his shitty Lolita fanfiction
in a troll thread.

>>19417760
Jesus took no wife.

>>19417749
>dillusional
There's a fucking spell checker built in to the window.

>>19417760
Desparate attempt to argue when blown out repeatedly, anon. God says not eat meat on Fridays or jerk off, but I'm guessing you don't follow the scripture there either. God also states it's expressly forbidden to have sex before marriage, and divorce is forbidden.

>>19417768
So it's your first day? Very good. Are you familiar with the /lit/izen that wrote the book that was like 20% nigger? Someone post the image.

>>19417716
>early adolescent females aren't fully developed; specifically, there's a high risk of damage to the vagina when penetrated by a fully developed adult penis
Easily mitigated by taking the time to stretch them out properly. You're on 4chan there's been images of girls barely older than toddlers taking dick posted here because their fathers took their time opening them up.
>pregnancy is risky as fuck
If you're finishing inside an eleven year old you deserve to get caught.
>our society has no support structure for young mothers
Could stop jailing the fathers I guess?

>>19417794
>blown out repeatedly
Kek anon you haven't made a single argument that wasn't easily refuted but keep coping.
>desparate
Use the spell checker you ESL shitter.

>>19417821
But you've been entirely refuted. You knocking over the pieces and claiming victory isn't winning the day.

>>19417807
I'm sorry for your raging autism and pathetic need to portray yourself as le heckin oldfag but OP very obviously has no interest in writing a book about pedophilia and is blatantly trolling all you retard spergs.

While we're on this topic, where the hell can one post stuff like incest, loli, rape, beastiality? Not that I intend to, I just want a home-base that doesn't hold any rules. Like, they're fucking words bro.

>>19417660
where can you read about victims accounts of pedophilia? I find this interesting

>>19417825
>But you've been entirely refuted
Cool point out the argument that doesn't revolve around your feelings being hurt.

>>19417813
>Easily mitigated by taking the time to stretch them out properly.
Based retarded numbskull. Its not penetration that damages their internals, lmfao, you are beyond retarded. No point in reading further.

>>19417848
>seething this hard
Awww anon got BTFO and can't cope.
>>19417716
>there's a high risk of damage to the vagina when penetrated by a fully developed adult penis
>>19417848
>Its not penetration that damages their internal
Learn how to read lil fella.

>>19417813
I was going to reply to each of your points, but I think this is your most interesting comment:
>If you're finishing inside an eleven year old you deserve to get caught.
I didn't say that pregnancy is risky for the pedophile; I said it was risky for the girl. Your mind went immediately to the concealment of the act of pedophilia rather than the health and well-being of the adolescent. That says everything about your character.

>>19417838
https://www.ipce.info/host/rivas/positive_memories.htm

>>19417860
>heehee in my hypothetical situation about pregnant eleven year olds the man is worrying about himself got him lmao
And? If you get an eleven year old pregnant because you're too stupid to pull out you better start worrying about yourself fast.
>b-b-but y-you d-don't care a-a-about the g-g-irl
The fictional girl you decided I ejaculated in? No, she's not my concern.

How commercially viable would a novel with illustrations about a fifteen year old girl having a romance with an adult swamp monster lady?

>>19417885
>Australian author and women's rights activist Beatrice Faust recalls the tender and consensual love relationship she had as a young girl with her adult friend Ritchie.
emmmm.............feminist bros...............

>>19417854
I'm not him, based retard lmfao. Initial penetration isn't what harms them, you retard. Its acute peritonitis and inflammation and you can kill a child, and stretching them out will simply prevent clitoral bleeding.

>>19417139
If child molestation is wrong, it is only because sex in general is wrong, b'since it introduces new life into this cruel world.

>>19417906
>I have no idea what I am talking about but I'm going to pretend I do
Peritonitis only occurs if penetration, something you are claiming does no harm, tears the thinner vagina of a child. Guess what stretching open their vagina stops from happening?
>hurr durr the dick doesn't hurt them they just get magically injured afterwards by the sex fairies
Moron.

>>19417890
There was no hypothetical situation in my post, nor did I suggest that you personally had any kind of relationship with a young girl. I stated the facts: sex with young adolescents is risky for the girl. You introduced the elements of guilt and concealment into the conversation. That says a lot about you.

Oi. One of you glowies answer my question.
>>19417837

>>19417139
OP is retarded. If you don't like the counter argument put up, then use your brain and come up with a better one. If you are actually a writer and not a troll you'd know that knowing how to hate yourself is 60% of writing and the other forty is description.
Now where are you posting that story once you're done?

>>19417951
>it's time for the 95 IQ reddit armchair psychology routine
Tell me how a girl gets pregnant when the man doesn't ejaculate in her. I'll do it for you. She can't, so your ebin biological list of heckin facts is dependent on the man being a fucking retard.

>>19417968
>Tell me how a girl gets pregnant when the man doesn't ejaculate in her. I'll do it for you.
NTA but guess how I know that you never had sex.

>>19417971
>let me tell you some edge cases involving semen
Ask me how I know you're a redditor

>>19417945
Its the thrusting that does the organ damage, dipshit lmfao. You can't stretch the space between her organs and that's why even the roastiest of the roasties die from this shit even though they can handle the initial penetration.

>>19417992
>it's not the penetration it's the...eh....penetration
Yes anon I already knew that thank you for agreeing with me. Trying to disguise the fact you're agreeing with me behind semantics is a bit sad.

>>19417985
Those are not "edge cases". Coitus interruptus is no more than 99,6% effective for a healthy couple capable of conception. Which, for any couple of young lovers who enjoy sex and can have lots of it, is really fucking bad - as that 0,04% is suddenly a lot if you are doing literally thousands of rolls.

Anon, literally and unironically have sex with an actual women, it might help.

>>19418004
Initial penetration ≠ the entirety of intercourse and rhythmic thrusting that actually causes the peritoneal inflammation. Stretching the vagina won't stop it, because it has nothing to do with the vagina, lol. Concede the point with grace next time.

>>19418010
>here's my examples of girls getting pregnant without getting ejaculated into
>it's girls getting pregnant by getting ejaculated into
1 - reddit terminology like nta
2 - jumping in like a little kid in class who thinks someone gave the wrong answer, only to end up agreeing with them
3 - cloying attempts to seem superior to someone on an shit anonymous imageboard
What's your reddit username?

>>19418027
What is actually damaged by peritoneal inflammation, like which tissue or organ? I'm having trouble following(I'm not op)

>>19418027
You can always tell when someone has lost when they resort to semantics.
>it has nothing to do with the vagina lol
Read
>>19417945
and try to learn something
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3540210/

This thread is off topic. No normie would think this in depth. You're over analyzing and you'll never reach a helpful conclusion this way.
You have to be able to think how they think. If you can't, then shelf the story and come up with a different idea that you are capable of writing. Accept your limitations anon.

Here's a tip if you're genuine:
It's not about the justification, it's about the emotion behind the dialogue.

SO! Since you're all FBI CIA lizard-lickers, surely someone among those I see posting every few seconds knows where the goddamn honeypot of loli erotica is.
Preferably that I can edit and isn't some shitty wiki like allthefallen.

For gods sake OP, at least wait until she’s 14!

>>19418032
>Not That Anon
>Reddit terminology

>>19418046
Its an infection is inflammation of the peritoneum — a silk-like membrane that lines your inner abdominal wall and covers the organs within your abdomen — that is usually due to a bacterial or fungal infection. Sex can cause an inflammation of the tissue through repeated thrusting of a large penetration.
>>19418048
Changes literally nothing I've mentioned. Please keep up, anon and you might learn something.

>read op
>/lit/ will handle this
>read thread
you should be ashamed of yourselves
>>19417139
an 11 year old girl is her father's property

>>19418070
>given proof this only occurs when vagina is torn
>tries to claim victory despite being wrong
What a strange character you are. Completely wrong about everything and still trying to save face.

>>19418090
>Scholarly article that doesn't touch on anything relevant
>(((Proof)))
lmfao, Jews really are all pedos.
Inflammation can occur without vaginal tearing, says it in the article lmfao

>>19418066
Go to archived.moe and link me one instance of nta being used before 2016. I'll wait.

>>19417139
no one wants to read your nonce pulp

>>19418106
Looks like this guy has the upper hand

>>19418106
>getting this desperate
>anything that proves me wrong is a jewish conspiracy
Now anon simply opening the link and Ctrl+F'ing the word tear will show you up as a liar. Are you this invested in saving face on an anonymous imageboard? You can be wrong nobody cares (except you)

>>19418106
>>19418140
>open link
>search for "tear"
>0 matches
>scroll down
fuck you both jesus why are women so disgusting bros

>>19417139
Nobody will read it, so write whatever you want.

>Can girl the child in coitus.
>Can kill the child in pregnancy.
>Can kill the offspring in pregnancy.
>Produces defective offspring.
>The relationships don't last.
>The child will spend her prime reproduction years in ruins, thus making her a societal drain.
That was easy. You can probably mitigate some of these things with peso justifications (don't @ me again), but the only reason to want to have sex with a child is literally;
>it makes my peepee feelings good to know this is happening
Which isn't much a justification for it in the first place, frankly. Please keep this off /lit/, because this isn't about literature.

>>19418201
>Can girl the child in coitus.
yes I want a girl child in coitus
>Can kill the child in pregnancy.
don't cum in a child
>Can kill the offspring in pregnancy
don't cum in a child
>Produces defective offspring
lol yes getting the healthiest earliest eggs is bad
>The relationships don't last
no one should ever be allowed have a relationship if this is a serious concern
>The child will spend her prime reproduction years in ruins, thus making her a societal drain
source: trust me bro
>peso justifications
ay carumba
>don't @ me again
no
>Please keep this off /lit/
no

>>19418239
>*kill
My mistake. Anyways, none of those had anything to do with feelings, and your entire justification for doing it in the first place is simply feelings, so I see no reasoning the pedophile can make when your exact critique is applied to peepee feelings.

>>19418263
>I see no reasoning the pedophile can make
I offer you a choice of car. They are identical make and model. One is brand new and has never been driven. This car will last you decades if treated well. One is second hand and has been driven by many men. This car will last you an indeterminate amount of time.

>>19418292
Oh, so then you're purchasing the car? Till death do you part, eh? Full commitment? This doesn't make sense since either will outlive you in terms of reliability. If it's your feelings about the car, well, still just peepee feelings and not really any justification.

>>19417885
uh janny how could you let this get posted you were supposed to be on our side
this isn't looking good for us bros oh no what if they break out the trauma myth we'll be done for, janny it's up to you!!!!!!

>doing permanent psychological (and possibly physical) damage to a human being
>"explain why bad"
if you weren't a troll OP I would say "end your life promptly"
actually scratch that, do it either way

>>19418117
Well this is gotta be embarrassing.

>>19418334
he said "nta" not "not that anon"
im curious because this is the first time I've seen anyone say "nta"
no shit people have been saying not that anon forever

>>19418321
You didn't answer the question.

>>19418334
Still waiting for one instance of
>nta
being used prior to 2016 reddit-fren.

>>19418387
Why are you doing this to yourself? You didn't even check the archives.

>>19418380
(((nta))) That's exactly how I feel.

>>19418332
>NOOOOOOOOOOOO I'VE BEEN DAMAGED BY ALL THOSE ORGASMS YOU GAVE ME NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>19418405
Your mom has been damaged by all those orgasms I gave her, tho

>>19418397
>2014
>/pol/
Kek I'll give you an out because it's pre-2016. Just.

>>19417139
>Bouguereau
Kek

>>19418412
Good for my Mom at her age kinda shows you up as a seething zoom-zoom though.

So what was the end result of the peritonitis thing? Who was lying

>>19418425
click the link and scroll down if i had to see it so do you

>>19418419
People who shit on bouguereau are soulless hipster faggots

>>19417139
>legal consequences, that's the obvious one
>societal shame
>will damage the 11 yr old for life
why was it so difficult for you to come up with those, anon... do you get off on people calling you a pedo or something lol

>>19418413
So is it /pol/ or is it /rddit/? Make up your mind, plz.

>>19418433
That study doesn't seem all that pertinent, skimming it. The question is the incidence of injury by age is it not

>>19418451
>/pol/
>reddit
what are the differences

>>19418438
I love him though, it's just funny that he gets brought up

>>19418457
>incidence of injury by age is it not
I'm going to go out on a limb and say very few children are admitted to hospital saying they've been having sex.

>>19418380
Its because the analogy was weak, so there was no need to answer it. People aren't cars you drive. You didn't answer my question that didn't involve feefees, and just made an analogy. This time answer without an analogy.

>>19418460
I heard you get b& for posting "nigger" on reddit.

>>19418405
all 0 of them lmao
get dunked on