[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 305 KB, 1024x691, Andromeda.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19407632 No.19407632[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>413 IQ
>Updated my best thoughts, probably for the last time
>#2, #36, and #16 have either been refined or added on because I quit caffeine

I'm thinking this is really gone today. There's nothing coming from me after what I've written down here:

https://pastebin.com/Y2vDggXq

It's only 1.25 more IQ points to the end of my brain at 28 years of age, and it's doubtful that they'll help me at all. Realistically, I am the world's smartest man. Probably for eternity because the highest IQ coming from people naturally will always be about 330, which is where my parents fall.

>> No.19407655

>>19407632

>Realistically, I am the world's smartest man

Tell me how your post got to this website

>> No.19407657

>>19407632
>>>/b/

>> No.19407660

>>19407632
This is advanced autism. If you were actually smart, you wouldn't need to peddle your pointless, meandering pseud babble in a place like this. You would be a successful scientist or philosopher with books renowned as the work of a genius.
Please wake up and realise you're just some fucking guy and your thoughts are as worthless as any pseud.

>> No.19407677

>>19407660
I don't see anything worthless about #16.

Nobody wants to buy my book on Amazon either, so that's proof I can't be a famous author even though my thoughts are concrete. I haven't sold one copy except to myself.

https://www.amazon.com/413-IQ-thinking-Best-Thoughts-ebook/dp/B09K5C6TQK/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=413+IQ+thinking&qid=1637041195&qsid=140-9964158-2435051&sr=8-1&sres=B09K5C6TQK%2C0749449543%2CB005D2JRFY%2CB092RNRV36%2CB00ODST5LU%2CB07X27C52L%2CB087D8H7MZ%2CB08SJ3T3M3%2CB07ZP9T3VW%2CB07W7YGCFJ%2CB08H5TYZVY%2CB07ZKX7TG8%2CB08YRG8NCV%2CB0787J6GSX%2CB08DVJBMM3%2CB01M6CQ0A9

>>19407655
I'm not well versed in web-hosting or internet servers, so I can't tell you. That doesn't mean I'm not intelligent. I can learn how, but I'm probably not going to.

>> No.19407688

>>19407632
I hate people like you. In your own little world until it's time to be admired then you dump your ruminations. By that time you're too tired, too emotionally overwhelmed to engage with anyone. Running the world is hard, after all. There's a whole crowd of other super geniuses like yourself that look for validation on /lit/, one had a thread earlier today. I have a simple insight for you guys, that normally I'd expect a super genius to get for himself: Other people don't care how smart you are. The words of a smart person do not inherently have more value than the words of a stupid person. Only the content matters, and your content clocks in around 120 IQ. Get good.

>> No.19407693

>>19407677
Why is no one buying my books? Why are books bought in the first place? How can I write books that people will want to read? Why did I need someone else to ask that question for me?

>> No.19407698

>>19407632
>#1) Life is likely eternal
Fuck off

>> No.19407702

>>19407688
>Only the content matters

That's a lie.
Friedrich Nietzsche's content is mental retardation compared to my own.

He never verbalized the dimension of time or the impact it has on life itself. He never even said "Everything moves in a circle." he only said "Oh. Everything is moved by something. The will to power." Like a damn moron.

He knew everything about the earth's spin and earth revolving around the sun, and he never put two and two together because he's missing 50 IQ points compared to me.

>> No.19407706

>>19407702
That's not content, that's experience. You can't even use the language.

>> No.19407708

>>19407632
Grammatical errors in the first paragraph. You're dumb.

>> No.19407711

>>19407706
>That's experience

I am only 24 years old. I have never gone outside alone. And I still out-think Friedrich Nietzsche and accurately record the patterns of the entire world and the human species.

Experience has nothing to do with anything. There are retarded people that believe in God to their dying breath and have been alive for 70 years and have never seen any evidence of it directly.

>> No.19407717

>>19407708
Where?

>> No.19407722

>>19407711
Even if that were true, it wouldn't matter because you can't express it. Nietzsche or any 70 IQ retard who writes English at a college level could best you in the public arena. So it's as if you never thought those thoughts or had those feelings in the first place.

>> No.19407727

>>19407717
You can't even tell. Kek.

>> No.19407732
File: 195 KB, 512x512, 46DD4450-CC26-4C69-BD76-355E8821006B.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19407732

>>19407717
>Probably for eternity because
Intelligence is perfection, and you have subverted your own claims in precise, pre-ejaculate pretense. Let the silence of your own empty mind be your eternal punishment for daring to elevate yourself over other infinite minds.

>> No.19407736

>>19407722
I don't care about the public. They like people just because they have a high forehead and listen to everything they say even if they're stupid. Everyone out there is retarded. If you gave the average person $1 billion USD they would be totally broke and likely in debt within 10 years.

The truth is, I have had and recorded these thoughts, and even if people never celebrate it, it will always exist and be recorded even if it is buried under mountains of garbage.

>> No.19407739

>>19407727
>Oh there's a problem, but you can't even tell it's there

Then there's no problem. You're just stupid and trying to attack me out of anger.

You read #1 and then you read #2, and you flew into a rage.

>> No.19407746 [DELETED] 
File: 83 KB, 448x800, thisguy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19407746

Your name is Kurt Lopez-davis and pic related is your face. You live in New Caney, Texas at 21445 Dogwood Dr.
An intelligent person wouldn't make this information available to a 2 minute google.
You are likely mentally ill in some way, likely autism.
For any anons interested, he is using his own "IQ test" where he measures his ears or some shit. His stuff could make some good inspiration for any schizo characters you're writing.

>> No.19407750

Please post proof of IQ

>> No.19407752

>>19407736
Your stuff sounds the same to everyone: it sounds average. Luckily, you don't care about that. You're happy thinking your special thoughts in your special little mind, and you're quite used to the idea that no one will ever show interest in your supposed abilities. Get used to it, most of the charlatans we get in here are in their 50s and 60s. The unpleasant truth is, if you can't write beautifully to match your thoughts, there's no way for anyone to "get" you the way you get yourself. If only one of you super-geniuses would take an english class, or any kind of class, to give your screeds some character.

>> No.19407756

>>19407746
K E K

>> No.19407758

>>19407746
I have that dartboard

>> No.19407764

>>19407746
faces of /lit/

>> No.19407766 [SPOILER] 
File: 226 KB, 521x583, 1637042762797.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19407766

>>19407746
I have defenses and a 7 KD:R in CS:GO. I don't worry about people. The guy that could beat me down can't come to my house. The guy that can come to my house can't beat me down.

Naturally, in a fortified position the average person has a 2:1 KD:R even if they're fighting someone with their exact IQ score.

>>19407750
Here you go.
And someone with a 107 IQ for comparison. The skull is just brain casing:
https://postimg.cc/xXJXHVjC

>> No.19407773

>>19407752
You're not even reading any of it and you're calling it average.

#16.) Everything moves through space-time, people included. This has been called Will to Power by Friedrich Nietzsche. Without space-time, something that has existed from the beginning of the universe (the dimension of time, in all its raw power, coming before space and likely being the origin of space itself), there is nothing motivating life on earth. People are no different from a flowing stream because of this, and you can expect them to constantly move forward, and because there is evolutionary coding to prefer certain shapes and objects and symbols, what ends-up happening is reproduction even through race-mixing. If you could see the grand plan of space-time, it would look like a smear of a moving object forwards and backwards. Space-time, but primarily the dimension of time (space is just affected by time), is the force responsible for gravity as well, so that's another way to look at this. I think time has existed since before the big-bang, and physical objects travel through it (are permeated by time) and influence it with their mass, and the resulting bend of time bends space (the bigger the mass the bigger the bend in time and therefor space), so that the force of gravity exists, which is actually the curvature and power of space-time itself. It is primarily a consequence of the dimension of time that all this happens as it is the real force to gravity. Space is just what is manipulated by time. Without time, objects would just spawn and stay in one place. There would be no potential for movement in reality at all because this is how important time is as a dimension of reality. Everything that exists in space moves through the dimension of time as well. So when a person experiences time, they are experiencing a dimension of reality that they evolved to perceive in moving objects. I see space as fighting the ocean of time, which is more than a universe wide, for the right to exist, and the primary reason time bends space is because it is larger than space. If I had to say what space-time looks like in action, I would say that it is like a ball (earth) moving through water (time) complete with a trail as objects move forward themselves. Space-time, but really the dimension of time, is a force so strong that it ties down everything to earth due to the force time has on the space of the earth. This is why objects fall when they are dropped, etc. Light is a universal constant because there is no space for time to bend. Human beings did not evolve to see the space-time continuum itself, but I am very sure this is what is happening. The forces of time and space influence the big-bang as well, forcing it to happen.

>> No.19407775

>>19407752
>>19407773
Organisms create their own consistent bend in space-time, and this bend pushes them forward at all times when combined with the world's bend in space-time. This means people are like space-junk or the moon orbiting the earth. I think a good visual example of space-time affecting matter on earth would be ocean currents and weather/hurricanes. They both move forward, but in a circular manner. Of course, these are caused by the spin of the earth (which expands beyond the earth itself due to time impacting space and then space impacting time, creating a circle in air and water and organisms as stationary objects are spun into an imperceptible circle by the spin of the earth and its space-time), but that spin is the space-time of earth itself, and this force is affecting every living thing on earth. So the circle of the earth's spin on its axis creates a circle in organic life that moves forward at all times due to its own bend in space-time, exactly like the earth. This is the force responsible for all of the people, buildings, businesses, and nations on earth today. All of it behaves according to the circular nature of the earth's space-time (which spins and forms an invisible circle in time) on man. Another great visible example would be the gas giants, Jupiter and Saturn. Space-time is likely affecting matter on earth in a similar way to the gases on those planets. I think an important thing to ask yourself is "Why not a still ocean/cloud?" or "Why do objects fall and not levitate?" when considering all of this.

I have never read a better explanation of space-time. It's not possible to come from some random on the street.

I don't even think Albert Einstein really did anything with general relativity. I think he stole from other people that think like me because I don't believe that he could come-up with my brain. I'm feeling like they're right when they say Einstein was a plagiarist.

>> No.19407778

>>19407773
He's being kind. It's bad.

>> No.19407783

What are the last 5 books you read?

>> No.19407785

>>19407773
>>19407775
just a bunch of assumptions based on the appearance of linear or cyclical events happening. You have no evidence of this, only revealed truth. In other words, it's time to go back on meds.

>> No.19407786

>>19407778
That's a lie. You're calling it bad because you understand it's incredible.

>>19407783
I don't read books because everyone else is stupid. If I could find someone with an IQ score above 413 I would read every word they write, but I'm the end forever.
>>19407766

>> No.19407788

>>19407632
>World’s smartest man
>Lopez
Opinion ……… disregarded!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>> No.19407790

>>19407785
>It's an assumption

You are the writer of the Bible to say this.
If you think the earth spinning doesn't mean anything, you need to reconsider your understanding of reality.

>> No.19407796

>>19407788
Ruy Lopez was the best Chess player in Spain for 20 years. 98 IQ standard.

Robert James Fischer was the best Chess player in the world. 96 IQ standard.

You have a low IQ score. My brain came from my 353 IQ Nicaraguan mother, not my 311 IQ European father. There are Mexican men with 316 IQ that are reproducing as I type this.

>> No.19407800

>>19407790
I didn't say it meant nothing. Unfortunately, that's all the energy I can happily spend debating a dunning-kruger basket case. I'm sorry you never found a use for your talent, you should apologize to your mother. Good night, sir.

>> No.19407804

>>19407796
If you're so smart why are you a carpenter instead of a scientist or an author or something?

>> No.19407805

>>19407800
Yes you did when you said it's an assumption.
Good night to you. I hope you don't wake-up and read this again.

>> No.19407809
File: 174 KB, 1530x745, MerillEdgeStory2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19407809

>>19407804
I'm a stock trader. This is my return.

>> No.19407823

>>19407804
>>19407809
I'm not having any kids though.
I am not someone that should be married. I am not intending to reproduce either because it forces animal murder.

>> No.19407826

>>19407823
I think we both know the decision not to reproduce was never yours to make, bucko.

>> No.19407830

>>19407677

>I'm not well versed in web-hosting or internet servers, so I can't tell you. That doesn't mean I'm not intelligent. I can learn how, but I'm probably not going to.

would take five minutes of research to figure it out, midwit

>> No.19407835

>>19407826
No, women are stupid and insane.
There are a lot of 40 year old women that just want kids, and I can offer that to them and they would say Yes, and then I would be married. Just get an Uber to go everywhere or get my wife to drive and have children within 2 years.

I understand people too well for it to not be a choice.

>> No.19407852

God, this lolcow again.

>> No.19407855

Have you ever taken a real IQ test, or a standardized test? How did you score on one of those?

>> No.19407859

>>19407826
>>19407835
I'll be honest.
I belong in mixed-raced hell with all of these people. Genetically I am 96.5 IQ human development which is Northern Ireland. There is no race of man that could easily kill mine if they out-numbered the men because the best race, 101.8 IQ, would die 2:1 to my own on the defense.

What I am is evil, and I am grateful I don't have to keep anything running for my race and can just play Battlefield 4 and write down my best thoughts.

>> No.19407870

>>19407855
I scored 1140 on the SAT out of 1600.
That doesn't mean anything too serious because it's just a test of your white-matter. Scoring too high on the SAT is actually a bad sign of insanity, and it can drop your IQ up to 10 points if you have too much mathematical ability in the same way the Chinese are.

>> No.19407874

>>19407855
>>19407870
Uruguayans run at the 96 IQ standard even though they're all missing 15 IQ points in White matter relative to the Russians/Irish.

It's only less developed because they have to ship everything to China because Brazilians are not developed like themselves.

>> No.19407898

>>19407855
>>19407870
And I know an 1140 SAT score is 66th percentile, but the average SAT test taker is probably at a 200 IQ standard, so I would be 66th percentile relative to an IQ score of 200 which is actually pretty nasty.

>> No.19407921

>>19407855
>>19407898
Yeah. I'm seeing someone with a 363 IQ and a 160 mathematical IQ that scored perfectly on the SAT. It's hell just to get to where I got.

>> No.19407945

This is based as hell, OP. I am in awe.

>> No.19407957

>>19407632
Congratulations on your high IQ. If you don't apply yourself it will be wasted, and as far as you are describing yourself, it is wasted.

Having a high IQ is a wonderful tool, like a very precise computer, which is great. Unfortunately it's also important who is using that computer... basically it's important how emotionally mature you are and what your goals are.
IQ is just a component an important one but not a definitive one. It should not define you, it should aid you. Having a book called with the title "My thoughts because I have an IQ of 400+" or something like that, will not be bought by anyone... and to be honest it's condensing.
I had the pleasure and displeasure to work with people at higher IQs and you tend to let it define you to the point where you think you are entitled to the only viable opinion in the room. Which will invalidate your point in society.
Take Einstein for example,he was smart and that got him famous, but he knew how to interact socially, at least at a basic level. Same goes many other geniuses even if they where monsters in private.

To round up my computer analogy. If you have a super computer operated by a brat who is always bragging about his super computer while he uses it to play Minecraft without doing something useful (for himself or society) with it, then it's wasted.

PS. writing a book is not an achievement and not necessarily useful. Less intelligent people wrote books. Writing a good book is something else.

>> No.19408045

>>19407632
You are just a 120 iq materialist, boring.

>> No.19408055

>>19407957
>It is wasted
>>19407773
>>19407775
No one has ever verbalized this before.

>> No.19408056

>>19407796
how do you know Ruy Lopez's IQ? he died 450 years ago or something.

>> No.19408269

>>19407632
>413 IQ
>somehow hasn't clocked in that he is having a first person experience of being alive right here right now
>spouts some inane materialistic nonsense as if he were an object even though throughout his entire life he has literally not had the experience of being anything but subject
>tries to ad hoc put together some kind of cyclical time, even though is literally trapped in the present instant since he was born
Kek I'm gonna press X to doubt

>> No.19408276

>>19408056
You can measure his head from the side. I haven't bothered to check. Lopez is a 300 IQ standard name. It's the same exact thing as Davis.

There is Edward Lopez and Edward Davis and that's the end of it and Joseph Lopez and Joseph Davis.

>> No.19408280

>>19408056
>>19408276
Really I'm just the Edward Lopez/Davis that ran up 81 IQ points. This is incredibly rare because the name Edward is extremely rare.

I think this must be 1 in 2000 men. So only 82 thousand men named Edward in America.

>> No.19408282

>>19408056
>>19408276
>>19408280
It's probably worse than that because I didn't come from a normal place. The average IQ of New Caney Highschool is 285, so it's likely 10-25 thousand men at max.

>> No.19408335

>>19408269
People are made of chemicals. People are the same thing as rocks with programming.

>> No.19408477
File: 228 KB, 500x606, E39F96DA-2E43-439F-9D2B-72E7E1CA1128.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19408477

>>19407632
Lmao are you the autistic pigs guy?
Your theories are shit. Your usage of “IQ” is Wittgensteins private language, so are many other words you use. You’re autistically claiming a “true definition” of words, just like you’re autistically claiming objective scientific truths.
I’m probably the only person itt that has actually read your mental masturbation outflow and just for an example: The white matter/grey matter dichotomy your claim between men and women has been disproven multiple times.

You try to quantify suffering. It’s impossible. You claim animals suffer, I don’t care, their dead flesh also tastes amazing.

Honestly I feel bad for you. You obviously have a problem with severe narcissism which prevents you from making genuine human connections and spent most of your day ruminating.

But alas I’m just a dumb fool.

>> No.19408496

>>19407746
poor guy

>> No.19408501

>>19408477
You are a dumb fool.
That's why you're posting from a phone.

>> No.19408539

>>19407632
lol

>> No.19408566

Comfy scchizo thread. Thanks OP.

>> No.19408683

>>19407746
had a good laugh this evening.

>> No.19408693
File: 84 KB, 1079x814, schizo.jfif.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19408693

Never has an image been more appropriate

>> No.19409002

>>19407632
Rick and Morty, Rick and Morty (Yeah)
Rick and Morty, Rick and Morty
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick and Morty (Yeah), Rick and Morty (Yeah)
Rick and Morty (Yeah), Rick and Morty
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick and Morty, Rick and Morty
Rick and Morty, Rick and Morty
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick, yeah
Yeah, Rick and Morty (Yeah)
Walked in the club, it's just me and my shorty (Ayy)
Grippin' on my tool, yeah, I'm grippin' on my .40
Shootin' with that three, yeah, you know I'm very sporty (Swish)
Ballin' like a sport, dunkin' on the court
Got this bad ass bitch, yeah, she's goin' to New York (Yeah)
Droppin' off the top on a brand new Porsche (Porsche)
Brand new Porsche, yeah, the roof got divorced (Yeah)
Rick and Morty, Rick and Morty (Yeah)
Rick and Morty, Rick and Morty
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick and Morty, Rick and Morty (Yeah, yeah)
Rick and Morty, Rick and Morty
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick and Morty (Yeah), Rick and Morty (Yeah)
Rick and Morty (Yeah), Rick and Morty
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick and Morty, nigga, jump on spaceships
And don't reach for my chain, you get hit with the K clip
Rick, Rick, Rick, Morty
Drop-top Bugatti, swag on early (Swag)
Drop that top in the Lambo', young nigga swervin'
I'm on a whole nother planet with Rick and Morty
That's a UFO, that's a Porsche twin turbo (Turbo)
When I jumped out the coupe, they like, "Hey, Big Draco"
Rick and Morty, Rick and Morty (Yeah)
Rick and Morty (Yeah), Rick and Morty
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick and Morty, Rick and Morty (Yeah)
Rick and Morty, Rick and Morty (Draco)
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick
Rick and Morty, Rick and Morty
Rick and Morty (Yeah), Rick and Morty (Yeah, yeah)
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick (Yeah)
Rick, Rick, Rick, Rick, yeah

>> No.19409150

>>19407766
>I have defenses and a 7 KD:R in CS:GO
Holy shit this is gold

>> No.19409205

>>19408276
You can measure his head from paintings only, which are inaccurate, yet you haven't provided any error bars in your estimation.

>> No.19409635

>>19407677
>That doesn't mean I'm not intelligent. I can learn how, but I'm probably not going to.
The yltimate mark if the pseud

>> No.19409643

Do you really think what you’ve written is the peak of human intelligence ? Do you have any idea how common some of these sentiments are? Do you have any idea how many of your arguments are based purely in pathos and nothing else? Read greater men and you will become humbled.

>> No.19409687
File: 29 KB, 712x154, EDF15E09-C64F-4099-8415-55C052064A89.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19409687

K E K

>> No.19409693

>>19407660
that’s hardly true at all, only a retard would think intelligence = renown
please note i didn’t read OPs ramblings, just got mad at your post

>> No.19409852

>>19407632
>Chris-chan
>Has a higher IQ than Nikola Tesla and Von Neumann according to the IQ test provided

>> No.19409877

>>19407773
>Everything moves through space-time, people included.
I can always create a frame of reference which keeps an object in the same place. Wrong from the first sentence.

>> No.19410291
File: 1.08 MB, 600x935, 62d7toc6udn51.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19410291

>>19407766
>I have defenses and a 7 KD:R in CS:GO. I don't worry about people.
Thank you OP, I needed that laugh.

>> No.19410393

>iq is determined by head shape
>my head shape means i have a 403 iq
>no i have no scientific basis for this, I don't need it because of my 403 iq

>> No.19410917

>>19410291
I don't play online games what does this mean

>> No.19411000

>>19410917
7 kill to death ratio in CounterStrike.

>> No.19411028

>>19410291
this is another anon that doesnt play CS for context, but im pretty sure that the matches are only 5v5...

>> No.19411034

>>19411028 here,
meant to reply to >>19410917

>> No.19411289

>>19407632
There are 12 different types of intelligence. Having an overall high IQ doesn't make your opinions right.
Even if I only score 100, I can be more competent than you in some fields.

>> No.19411727

>>19407632
Everything you know has been claimed by another. How do you even know the big bang if you haven't read authors or studied at university/listened to professors ? You just casually observe and have this general intuition about the world ? Why can't you innovate ? Do you claim to be a philosopher who has no experience in the subject? Just genuine questions

>> No.19411838

>>19411028
It's 10 v 10
>>19411727
The big bang is just a code-word for Quantum fluctuations releasing great deals of energy that turns into mass as time goes on. It's the best theory as to why the Universe is the way it is. It was made by someone with a 360 IQ as well.

>> No.19412064

>>19411028
>>19411838
5v5 is ranked, and the people playing the ranked servers are all in the 95th percentile or higher of the CS:GO community.

>> No.19412079

>>19411028
>>19412064
And then you have to factor in the IQ jump as well and that the 95th percentile is on a game where the average IQ of a typical player is 210, and it's easily +90 more IQ points to successfully play the ranked mode and win, and that's only to get a very high incidence of winning.

If you can beat everyone in Ranked CS:GO 100% of the time then you are the best in the world at the game.

>> No.19412322

>>19409643
They're not common ideas at all.
Anyone writing out my thoughts is at least 360 IQ, but they're not as refined as mine.

>> No.19412464

>>19410393
You trust stupid people on the corner with your life?

>> No.19412502 [DELETED] 
File: 73 KB, 1920x1080, Xpyx9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19412502

>>19410917
>>19411000
>>19410291
>>19409150
Everyone is acting like it doesn't mean anything, but this person is very dangerous in real life, and he's near the best CS:GO player on earth.

>> No.19412792

>>19412464
What are you on about? I trust nobody with my life except maybe my closest friends and family
Telling OP that his "head size = IQ, and also my head size is the HIGHEST IQ" theory is dumb as shit has no bearing on me trusting another with my life

>> No.19412798
File: 32 KB, 491x358, 1617930127601.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19412798

>>19412079
>a game where the average IQ of a typical player is 210
You're either a master baiter or an impressive schizoid

>> No.19412811 [SPOILER] 
File: 73 KB, 1920x1080, 1637117475156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19412811

>>19412798
I've seen people in the game and taken their IQ score from when they use their face as an avatar.

It's 210 IQ at minimum to play CS:GO. The best CS:GO players on earth are 300-340 IQ and 160 mathematical IQ

>> No.19412813
File: 26 KB, 650x450, johnroll2.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19412813

>>19407632
>413 IQ

>> No.19412814

>>19412811
And on what basis do you make the claim that IQ can be derived from head shape?

>> No.19412816
File: 8 KB, 300x168, download (3).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19412816

>>19412792
If it's so stupid why does Friedrich Nietzsche have a longer ear-to-forehead ratio than you?

He even prominently displays it

>> No.19412821

>>19412814
If you think it can't you're wrong. See
>>19412816
It's literally a bigger brain/brain-casing despite the impact of prenatal estrogen/testosterone.

>> No.19412822

>>19412816
But you make the claim that he has a high IQ BECAUSE of his head shape. You have no reason and no scientific basis for this claim, especially considering the amount of retards I've met with plenty of space between their ear and forehead.
>>19412821
>more brain space means more smarter
You are a hilarious caricature of a man

>> No.19412837

>>19412822
>more brain space means more smarter

That's exactly true.
Ants have a small brain space and they can't do anything.

>> No.19412845
File: 70 KB, 800x533, Some_image.width-800.aba6468.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19412845

Out of the way, brainlets

>> No.19412849

>>19412837
>That's exactly true.
Show a scientific source then, and explain the plethora of stupid individuals with a high ear-to-forehead ratio
>>19412845
Kek'd

>> No.19412873

>>19412849
Post one.
I've never seen a dumb person with a high ear-to-forehead ratio.

>> No.19412891

>>19412873
>Post one.
Once met a guy who gave the Empire State Building as an example of an Empire in history class (this was in college). Realistically, there's a million anecdotal examples anyone could give about idiotic people with a specific head shape, and your refusal to try and source any scientific fact in your argument shows your midwittery.
And to go for the easy low-hanging fruit, (You) are another good example.

>> No.19412900

>>19412891
I need you to post a picture I don't trust the people you meet because they're like you.

>> No.19412909

>>19412900
I'll do that when you post any evidence that IQ and head shape are linked, Kurt.

>> No.19412916
File: 264 KB, 1231x1533, 1595739753096.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19412916

>>19407632
> #4.) The Bible is not true. It is a lie written by extremely controlling, manipulative men with an IQ of 285 or so. You can tell their IQ is 285 because they invented every single name you see written, and the typical man named, and naming your child is a test of intelligence, John, Paul, or Adam, has an IQ of roughly 285.

>> No.19412919

>>19407632
How much of the population do you think has an IQ over 200? You seem to severely underestimate the intellect one with an IQ of 200 would have, and grossly overestimate the number of people with that IQ

>> No.19412931

>>19412919
A 200 IQ is very low.
It can't do anything in life. People would be starving to death in droves on a daily basis today if 200 IQ were the IQ ceiling of man.
>>19412909
You don't do it because you know what you're supporting is not right and ultimately incorrect.

>> No.19412941

>>19412916
The person you're posting is roughly 364 IQ, so that's not a bad person to be compared to.

>> No.19412943
File: 133 KB, 1648x691, main-qimg-76063f91492c81020d4c8f4aa780961d-c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19412943

>>19412931
I don't think you understand what IQ is, anon
>you know what you're supporting is not right and ultimately incorrect.
Bold words from the man peddling his own science to make him the smartest man in the world

>> No.19413014

>>19412943
Totally incorrect chart that fails to account for IQ heritability or people with similar IQ scores intermarrying and setting new genetic IQ standards.

>> No.19413025

>>19413014
Retard

>> No.19413027

>>19413014
>no, it's the definition of IQ itself that is wrong!
kek, I'm done replying now. enjoy your delusions, hopefully they don't get too lonely

>> No.19413089

>>19413025
You're the retarded one. IQ doesn't work like this at all.
>>19413027
If a child gave you their definition of IQ, would you believe him? That's what's you're picking up when you go to "professionals"

>> No.19413102

The fact that this retard manages to bait lit with the same stale bait every few days makes me think he is actually a genius. Or that the rest of lit is composed by even dumber retards.

>> No.19413107
File: 68 KB, 480x480, 1617650159810.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19413107

>>19413089
>do you trust DICTIONARIES for your definitions? follow my poorly-explained logic with no scientific basis instead!
an IQ of 100 is literally just the average IQ of the population
a person from 200 years ago with an IQ of 100 would be significantly less intelligent than one today with an IQ of 100. it is not static, like your ill-informed brain seems to think
>>19413102
He's good at his job of baiting, I will admit. The best trolls are the ones you enjoy feeding

>> No.19413122

>>19407632
>Evaluates ideas solely based on the IQ of the person that each given idea is associated with
>Claims 413 IQ
>Somehow hasn't figured out that epistemes possess an existence independent of the minds that generate and interact with them, and therefore that ideas must be evaluated first on the basis of their own innate properties, then (perhaps) on their relation to/interaction with existing human minds
Ngmi. Possibly an actual case of Dunning-Kruger.

OP, try reading Spinoza or maybe Roland Barthes. Even if you think they're dumber than you (they aren't), both thinkers have still articulated and therefore also understood things which you clearly still do not understand. But then again you'll probably just waste your time and only notice the things they wrote that seem as though they confirm ideas you already have, seeing as you did that with Friedrich Nietzsche.

>> No.19413123

>>19413107
It's easy to define a word.
It's hard to define reality.

>> No.19413131

>>19413122
That Roland Barthes is a 310 IQ retard.

>> No.19413152

>>19413123
But you have done neither; just made claims with no backing to them

>> No.19413181

>>19413152
No. I've defined reality very well.

>> No.19413191

>>19413181
You need some factual or scientific basis at the very least to make broad statements on the nature of reality. You've only made claims, then stated that they must be true for some poorly-constructed reason
The definition of reality can vary from person to person.

>> No.19413206
File: 162 KB, 1080x1350, y5z1oivtvi431.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19413206

>>19413089
>You're the retarded one. IQ doesn't work like this at all.
It sure does.
T. Actual 134 IQ. INTJ, 93rd percentiler.

>> No.19413212

OP is one of the most masterful trolls /lit/ has seen in a long time. This thread is breathtaking.

>> No.19413219

>>19413212
Anyone willing to write an exceptionally long pastebin for a repeat troll operation has my respect (and the underlying assumption that they are indeed an actual schizoid that believes what they say)

>> No.19413232

>>19413191
No it can't.
We all live in the same Universe and evolved from the same place. There is only one truth in the same way 1+1 = 2

>> No.19413245

Did your shitty test and got 424, fuck you.

>> No.19413246

>>19413245
Post proof

>> No.19413252

>>19413246
Nope. I'm not making the same mistake you did; the 11 point difference allows me to know that my CS:GO KD:R doesnt effect my real life fighting skills.

>> No.19413261

>>19413252
also, I actually liked the verbal problems part.

>> No.19413265

>>19413252
>my CS:GO KD:R doesn't affect my real life fighting skills

It does though. You can see proof right here:
>>19412811

If you think that guy couldn't kill a lot of people in real life you would be dreaming. He literally has a similar face to Anders Behring Breivik.

>> No.19413269

>>19413265
Give me a few days and I'll prove to you why you're wrong.

>> No.19413277

>>19413269
You need to post the side of your head or you're fake until you do so.
I've had people claim 550 IQ

I'm labeling you "angry liar" until you post proof. Your IQ isn't real until you prove it.

>> No.19413281

>>19407773
>Everything moves through space-time, people included. This has been called Will to Power by Friedrich Nietzsche.
Now you're just baiting (You)s

>> No.19413284

>>19413277
550 is not possible and if you think it is you don't properly understand your own theory.

>> No.19413294

Do this test faggot
https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/FSIQ/1.php

>> No.19413297

>>19413284
If I reproduced with a 413 IQ female, 493 IQ would be the next step. And then if I reproduced with that offspring, it would be a 534 IQ, and then from that 534 IQ could come a 554 IQ, etc.

>> No.19413307

>>19413297
>And then if I reproduced with that offspring

Holy fucking based.

>> No.19413312

>>19413297
Thank you for confirming you are Asian.

>> No.19413314

>>19413297
Did you make this theory or did you just copy it badly from somewhere? You either don't understand it, or can't do basic constant harmonic functions; read A Proof of Liouville's Theorem.

>> No.19413322

>>19413314
It's real life.
My Dad is 311 IQ and my mother is 353 IQ.
Together they make a 332 IQ standard. I ran up 81 IQ points from that, and that's likely the ceiling because Geraint Davies is 387 IQ and he came from a 306 IQ standard.

>> No.19413337

>>19413322
>likely the ceiling
Come on dude, you're so close but missing something so obvious. Really it's simple. Reread my last reply.

>> No.19413345

>>19413337
No. Realistically it's the ceiling.
Maybe there are people at 90 or 100, but they're so rare that such runs will never crop-up at a 280+ IQ standard.

>> No.19413352

>>19413345
Again, you missed the point.

>> No.19413355

>>19413352
There's no point.
You just don't like the truth that I'm the World's Smartest Man.

>> No.19413382

>>19413355
I could not care less what IQ you possess, it looks to me that you are the world's most arrogent man. I have found a flaw in your otherwise sound logic and you are not listening to my suggestions on how you can implement it for a more realistic test. Do you actually want to improve and fix your test or are you too attatched to your puerile labels to implement my suggestions?

>> No.19413388

>>19413382
It's as easy as measuring the skull of the parents and the skull of the offspring and seeing the difference. There's nothing to it.

You don't need a math book to do this.

>> No.19413400

>>19413388
Oh look everyone, it was the latter. Grow up, anon, then perhaps people will start buying your book.

>> No.19413418

Is the blue whale a smarter creature than man since they have bigger brains than humans?

>> No.19413527

>>19413418
Maybe maybe not. Depends where the brain is at in the brain itself.

>> No.19413529
File: 76 KB, 976x687, 1622782135901.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19413529

>>19413527
>Depends where the brain is at in the brain itself
huh?

>> No.19413531

>>19413418
>>19413527
It's 15,000,000,000 neurons in a Blue whale relative to 21,000,000,000 neurons in a human being.

So the average IQ of the Blue Whale would be 84 in a human being.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_by_number_of_neurons

Somebody evil put 16 billion and 21 billion on the human neuron count, so it's hard to say.

>> No.19413533

>>19413531
So the killer whale may be more intelligent (by OP's logic) since they have the most neurons?
Interesting. Perhaps I can seduce one

>> No.19413557

>>19413533
I had to change it to they are because of this post.
There's literally no reason to pretend it's not that way.

>> No.19413632

>>19413388
> Measuring your parent's skulls
> Not forcing them to take a CSCAN and multiple cognitive tests while they are in there.
Spoken like a true ~80 IQ pleb.

>> No.19413637

>>19413632
It doesn't take a CSCAN to see the size of someone's brain.

>> No.19413663

>denial of god
>utterly materialistic worldview
>contradictions so frequent i don't even know where to begin

you will be violently humbled at some point. try not to kill yourself when it happens

>> No.19413675

>>19413663
>Violently humbled

Never happening.

>> No.19413728

>>19412837
Cranial capacity(as a volume) compared to body mass(also as volume) in a ratio is much closer to a valid methodology. It is why humans are smarter than whales.
Whales who have a huge cranial capacity but also a large body mass.
Humans with a large cranial capacity, but a small body mass in comparison.

>> No.19413731

>>19413728
No. That's not true.
People have big brains because they need big brains because they're totally useless in the wild otherwise.

The same thing happened for Killer Whales because they had to be able to think to find food at all times. It's why filter feeding whales are low IQ relative to Orcas.

>> No.19413746

>>19413731
What’s not true?
Humans aren’t smarter than whales? Or Cranial Capacity has nothing to do with intelligence? Pick one or otherwise state your case.
Cranial capacity:Body Mass has been accepted scientific theory in recent history (and likely still is, no I’m not going to check for you).

>> No.19413748

>>19413746
That brain size relative to body size always out-weighs brain size to body size. That's a lie.

If you have a bigger body you automatically have a bigger brain even if it's not the 7x on encephalization that human beings carry.

>> No.19413749
File: 159 KB, 384x384, 1636941167979.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19413749

>>19407632
Lmfao based

>> No.19413751

>>19413746
>>19413748
1 Killer Whale is feeding 13 people everyday through hunting. It has to have a big brain and be smarter than man to do so because they're not fast or invisible.

>> No.19413765

>>19407711
>I am only 24 years old. I have never gone outside alone.
OP, you aren't high IQ, you're retarded. That's why your mom never lets you out without adult supervision.

>> No.19413768 [DELETED] 
File: 31 KB, 340x438, Albatross.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19413768

Why is Rime of the Ancient Mariner so well known and liked? The subject matter is interesting but I find it really clunky. For example, this stanza does scan well at all for me:

At length did cross an Albatross,
Thorough the fog it came;
As if it had been a Christian soul,
We hailed it in God's name.

The third line of it especially is weird, opening with three unstressed syllables, unless you really unnaturally stress the "if". Ballad meter is loose, but this seems to read poorly, you have to cram in the extra syllable at the beginning to match the rhythm of the first line and it's compounded by not being in an iamb.

Am I missing something?

>> No.19413794

>>19413281
Did OP find this pastebin full of psued nonsense and decide to bait with it, or did OP decide to write pages of psued nonsense in order to bait? I can't decide which is more sad.

>> No.19413854

based OP

>> No.19413893

You don't explain any of your assumptions. I'm willing to consider the implications of your arguments, but you can't simply state that

"there are only so many ways for a big bang to begin "

without giving a reason for your belief or stating that this is an assumption on your part.

it is a simple matter to imagine an infinite number of ways that a "big bang" might occur. for example, a perfect sphere expanding with velocity v for any natural number v.

how would you refute an example such as the above?

>> No.19413900

>>19407632
You made the argument that the man is evil because selectively breeds pigs that are more intelligent and thus have a higher capacity of suffering, did I understand you correctly?
Does it mean that when man switches to lab-grown meat, he will stop being evil? Can I reproduce then?

>> No.19413950

>>19413900
They'll never switch to lab grown meat. It will always be extremely expensive.

>> No.19413952

>>19413900
>>19413950
https://thecounter.org/lab-grown-cultivated-meat-cost-at-scale/

>> No.19413955

>>19413950
For the sake of the argument, let's assume they do.

>> No.19413963

>>19413955
I'm not going to assume they do.
It doesn't cost much of anything to feed and grow an animal. It costs a lot to grow artificial meat. It's never coming.

People are too stupid to do something like that. It takes at least 100-200 more IQ points to build that successfully. It's the same reason everyone will die with the earth.

>> No.19413988

>>19413963
I think you misunderstand me. I am not interested in discussing the feasibility of lab grown meat with you.
I merely want to understand if I followed your reasoning correctly.
If humans manage to switch to lab grown meat, then they stop being evil.
Is this logical conclusion correct according to your point of view? Yes or now?

>> No.19414000

>>19413955
>>19413963
I'll be honest.
They're probably coming with it.
I could make it at 373 IQ

>> No.19414003

>>19413988
>>19414000
The answer is Yes.
I was still thinking they were at $325 thousand USD for a hamburger.

>> No.19414010

>>19414003
Good. I am happy to have your blessing to procreate

>> No.19414018

>>19414010
I wouldn't do it until it's on the market and people are eating it without getting cancer.

>> No.19414025

OP, you claim that the universe (and by extension the human brain) is deterministic, but recent experiments have shown that quantum mechanics appears to be /genuinely/ random, meaning that even a hypothetical complete & infinite understanding of the universe's wave function is still not enough information to accurately predict the outcome of events at quantum scales. Do you reject these results? or do you somehow otherwise square that with your beliefs?

>> No.19414027

>>19414025
It's all predictable outside of a quantum standard.
That means it's all valid.
Einstein was 10 IQ points ahead of John Von Neumann.

>> No.19414033

>>19414025
>>19414027
And there's probably a layer below what man observe where it all makes perfect sense.

I don't think that they can really say that it's totally random. If it were truly all random, then there wouldn't be any potential for atoms to cluster into a solid because then the force of time would not be a factor.

>> No.19414036

>>19414027
So you're claiming that quantum mechanics can not have an effect on the macro, human-scale world? Proofs to the contrary of this sentiment are trivial. Schrodinger's cat, for instance, is a classic example of a quantum event having macro-scale effect.

>> No.19414037

>>19407632
kek so this retard invented his own definiton of IQ which gives him hundreds of it, and now you retards proceed to give him attention while he spreads his deranged drivel?
Stop bumping this thread

>> No.19414039

>>19414036
No. I'm claiming that the current understanding of Quantum particles is on par with people saying Dark matter is real.
>>19414033
They have it broken and twisted.

>> No.19414063

>>19414010
>>19414018
I don't think it's good.
It costs $4 USD to make 4 ounces of chicken.
It only costs $.5 to make 6 lbs, or 96 ounces, of Chicken meat with industrial animal slaughter.

I don't believe in it. I think they're going to hit a plateau and become incapable of reducing costs.

>> No.19414067

>>19414010
>>19414063
Eventually they'll get stopped.
They're having massive drops in price because it's totally new tech, but it could get stuck at something awful like $.75 USD to make 6 lbs of chicken.

No reasonable nation would support that.

>> No.19414104

>>19407632
for a 413 IQ man, you are quite retarded

>> No.19414108

>>19414104
No. I'm extremely intelligent.
I've done things no one else can do and recorded all of it:
>>19407773
>>19407775

>> No.19414112

>>19414010
>>19414063
>>19414067
And it takes pure electricity to make the meat itself. That means there's 0 chance for it to be less expensive than a normal slaughterhouse, so it will never be stopped. So man is ultimately evil.

>> No.19414127 [DELETED] 

>>19414010
You don't have my blessing.
Cultured meat being less expensive than a slaughterhouse is never coming true.

>> No.19414959

>>19414108
name one thing you've done no one else can other than make a colossal shitpost fag

>> No.19414971

>>19414033
Time is not a force

>> No.19415019

>>19407711
>Experience has nothing to do with anything
Oh no no

>> No.19415067

>>19408055
>No one has ever verbalized this before.
No, it's just been worded differently, but also, you missed the point of >>19407957
Going off of this thread alone, you are likely very unsocial, whether you like it or not, and you will not be able to do much, or go anywhere in life, unless you actively start to influence people.

>> No.19415396

>>19407632
What do you bench and how fast can you run a mile?

>> No.19415408

I kneel...

>> No.19415457

>>19407632
Fake!

>> No.19415462

>>19412919
You're implying that IQ points increase indefintely. IQ is measured on regular scales up to 200.
Talking about anything beyond that is meaningless. That is the scale used to classify population according to that metric, rather than in reverse .

What's scary about OP is that it seems to elaborate to be a troll.

>> No.19415474

>>19415462
OP outed himself as a retard who doesn’t know what IQ actually is when he said the chart in >>19412943 was incorrect
He could be a very good troll, but putting your name, face, and hotmail to 4chan seems too far for a simple bait.

>> No.19415490

>>19415474
It looks incorrect to me too though. IQ is a bell curve that's adjusted for the population that it's trying to measure. They do it so that left and right of the peak have the same population numbers.

>> No.19415553

>>19413952
>https://thecounter.org/lab-grown-cultivated-meat-cost-at-scale/

Good read.

>> No.19415602

>>19407632
I was at least expecting something interesting, all of these ideas are old hat at this point

>> No.19415634

>>19407632
Checked out your pastebin :D you're a moron, probably 115 IQ range

>> No.19415641

>>19415634
You're literally a retarded phoneposter. Don't use 115 iq as an insult when you're sub 100.

>> No.19415648

>>19415641
wtf is a phoneposter? lolll

>> No.19415660

Best thread of the year

>> No.19415664
File: 521 KB, 220x186, jerma.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19415664

>>19407632 (OP) #

>> No.19415668

>>19415648
Are you too stupid to figure it out? Feigning ignorance? Both are embarrassing traits to have.

>> No.19415696

>>19415668
anger is a sign of low intelligence you know ;)

>> No.19415739

>>19415696
Why do you think I'm angry?

>> No.19415983

>>19413252
KEK

>> No.19416489

based op

>> No.19417364 [DELETED] 

Lol you are fair game.
ww.linkedin.com/in/kurt-lopez-davis-b145bb85/

ww.zillow.com/homedetails/21445-Dogwood-Dr-New-Caney-TX-77357/28739635_zpid/

esearch.mcad-tx.org/Property-Detail?PropertyQuickRefID=R143269&PartyQuickRefID=O0513637

>> No.19417384
File: 83 KB, 448x800, 1637042505278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19417384

just end yourself

>> No.19417451

>>19414971
It's a dimension of reality which is the root of force, so it may as well be force.

>> No.19417460

>>19415067
>It's been worded differently

I'll send you 100 thousand USD, my life savings, if you find that exact message worded differently.

>> No.19417464

>>19417384
I'm going to out live because I'm smarter and likely younger than you.

How does that make you feel?

>> No.19417474

>>19414971
>>19417451
I would say time is force. It has been called gravity by another name, but gravity is just space reacting to time.
Anything else is wrong.

>> No.19417481

>>19417364
>>19407766

>> No.19417493

>>19407775
>>19407773
You write like a high schooler. If you really do have big brain iq meme then you should go to college. You come across as being very uneduated

>> No.19417500

>>19417451
>>19417474
>>19414971
Realistically, if something compresses something else and pushes down on it and forces things down, it is literally a force.

So the dimension of time doubles as a force.

>> No.19417513

>>19417493
You're angry I'm smarter than you.
No highschooler would ever write that.

>> No.19417657

>>19417464
You are mentally ill. The shit that you wrote makes no sense. I bet your parents are worried about you. Also nobody cares whos smarter.

>> No.19417693

>>19417657
Keep thinking that and you're guaranteed to end-up dying early.

>> No.19417726

>>19407632
How many of these threads have you made here Kurt?

>> No.19417745

>>19417726
2 or 3

>> No.19417759

>>19417745
Kurt is based, he have 307 IQ points

>> No.19417773

>>19417745
Absolute lie. I've seen at least 5 over the past few months
You'd think someone with 413 IQ would be able to remember such a trifle

>> No.19417781

>>19417773
It stays up for multiple days at a time and it's the same thread.

>> No.19417799

>>19417781
Checked the archive, you have indeed posted the thread 5 times
You also gave yourself an extra 5 IQ points in that time

>> No.19417831

>>19417799
Well, those first 2 times I guess it wasn't anything serious.

>> No.19417937

Anyone who claims 413 IQ is probably not 413 IQ.

>> No.19417950

>>19417937
You do realize people marry other people with similar IQ scores to themselves? You do realize two 123 IQ people could make a 204 IQ from the first child?

>> No.19417960

>>19417937
>>19417950
Probably only 154 IQ because there's less brain to move away from.

>> No.19417997

>>19417937
>>19417950
>>19417960
And then there are men that are already 280 IQ intermarrying with 123 IQ women because they're docile and and can't think, so it gets even worse.

>> No.19418014

OP, I read 10 of your points and skimmed a few more.

I have read quite a few books in my life and believe there to be good evidence of my own intelligence which I won't list here because it would be pointless to do so. Now, as to your writing I have several comments.

Typically in my experience a highly intelligent person when carrying out some endeavor - be that writing or otherwise - will signal the fact of their intelligence through various means. In the same way an athlete might want to show off their body or aggression before a big match in order to draw attention to themselves and signal the value of the subsequent main event, you should desire to signal to other intelligent readers the nature of your ability. When it comes to writing that would mean added layers of nuance such as: advanced diction, prose, an ability to explain thoughts succinctly, an ability to organize and structure your thinking, etc. Compare Nietzsche and Schopenhauer; both successfully signal high intelligence in their writing through different approaches.

Unfortunately for you, in your writing I fail to see these signals of intelligence. All of your points lack clarity and expect the audience to form the clarity for you. Consider your very first line: "Life is likely eternal." "Likely"? Really? You're going to talk about the nature of all things, and within your first statement give us a mushy thesis which already implies a conception of probability?

More broadly speaking I sense a strong lack of philosophical knowledge. It's not that other philosophers disagree with you, it's that you don't even understand the interesting questions. You are approaching all of reality from this myopic materialistic worldview with no self-awareness of the outside possibilities.

I'm reading "The View From Nowhere" right now. As I read this book I feel myself expanding and forced to engage with the text. Thomas Nagel's clarity and precision of language is refreshing and drives me to understand more, to struggle with ideas that I cannot yet fully encapsulate, and to test out what I've learned in my own thinking. When I read your points, I have none of these feelings. Rather, it feels like I'm at a party and some 120IQ midwit is high and telling me his stoner thoughts.

I'm not saying you're a lost cause. I'm telling you the truth because you asked for it. You asked the universe to look at your writing and it did. Learn what you can from this.

>> No.19418047

>>19418014
>You asked the universe to look at your writing and it did. Learn what you can from this.

You think you’re the universe?

>> No.19418086

>>19417950
>>19417960
>>19417997
By the definition of IQ, it is impossible to go above 200.
What do you think IQ is? What determines it?

And do the fucking test in >>19413294 you gigantic faggot

>> No.19418097

>>19418086
They're simply stealing IQ points from people when they say IQ can not go over 200. They know it runs to 400+ and they're lying to people. Grading them on rarity instead of how much smarter they are over the average IQ score to lessen the blow and make people look stupid.

>> No.19418115

>>19418097
Again, what do you think IQ is?
And again again, take the fucking test you pseud master baiter

>> No.19418133

>>19418014
Thomas Nagel is 309 IQ.
I'm expecting the viewer to think about what I've written and make their own conclusions.

>> No.19419391

This faggot used to spam threads in /r9k/, in every thread he would bump up his IQ a little bit, cant imagine how much free time and dedication you need to post that shit so many fucking times. Cool to see this schizo posts in /lit/ now

>> No.19419828

>>19413294
Do it pussy

>> No.19419830

>>19414037
Elaborate lol, I need to get to the bottom of this.

>> No.19420138

>>19407632
I’m impressed that your best thoughts have so many views.

>> No.19420610

>>19408477
>You claim animals suffer, I don’t care
That's usually the sign of being a subhuman
>muh genuine human connections
yes you are a dumb fool probably

>> No.19421163

>>19407660
>You would be a successful scientist or philosopher with books renowned as the work of a genius
After a certain point — no. People end up literally too autistic/intelligent for society and burn out hard.

>> No.19422020

>>19417831
You guess? Why don't you know? Your entire pastebin is like this. Full of "I thinks" and "likely". Low IQ people do this. And you do this a lot. You are low IQ.

>> No.19422027

>>19407677
Get in the comfy crab bucket

>> No.19422039

>>19407632
I fucking hate this board

>> No.19422051

>>19422039
t. Midwit with less than 413 in iq

>> No.19422053

>>19414037
This is one of the best recurring threads on this board. Who cares if OP is wrong and being dumb. He seems to earnestly believe what he says and tries to have reasonable discussions about it. It's 100x better than the thousandth thread on buddhism or "was _____ based".
It's also actual original writing instead of regurgitated youtuber opinions, even if it is drunk high schooler level.

>> No.19422342

>>19418133
>Thomas Nagel is 309 IQ.
> The author of Mind & Cosmos is 309 IQ
I mean, if you are going to bait, you should at the very least keep it somewhat believable.
> Yes, out of all the bullshit OP said in this thread, this is the most insane.

>> No.19422348

>>19407632
What does William James Sidis score?

>> No.19423039 [DELETED] 

>>19422348
330 IQ or so.
I measured his head in profile.
All you do is check your skull relative to someone elses in the mirror and measure to the side of the eye using the ear.

>> No.19423046 [DELETED] 

>>19422348
>>19423039
329 IQ.
I saw his face when he was 16 years old, and he looked pure evil. That's how I know he is.

I think if he weren't Jewish and had access to firearms he may have hurt a lot of people like Nikolas Cruz (who is smarter than sidis)

>> No.19423086 [DELETED] 

>>19422348
As high as 343 IQ on a recent testing.
I don't trust the childhood photo of the side of his head because it feels like someone that wasn't in his family took it

>> No.19423103 [DELETED] 

>>19422348
>>19423086
I'd say 359 IQ.

>> No.19423170

>>19422348
I had to give him a refined testing.
He's 308 IQ.

>> No.19423195

OP you're a mexican and probably grew up surrounded by complete retards, internet being the closest to upbringing you've got. You need professional help, find a doctor before it gets worse.

>> No.19423326

How have jannies allowed this post to stay up? I don't even care but I've seen them take down posts actually relevant to literature, this I literally just a schizo post.

>> No.19423348

>>19423195
I'm from 96.5 IQ human development. Mexicans are 88 IQ human development. That's 7.5 IQ points in human development, or the difference between Slovenia and Azerbaijan.

>> No.19423362

>>19423195
>>19423348
Or the UK and Greece
That's a giant jump in thinking.

>> No.19423379

>>19407632
>thinking IQ comes from ear size.
IQ comes from averaging the weight of your shits dumbass.

>> No.19423741

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvV4aIMzP1I

>> No.19423745

Why is this post still up?

>> No.19424095

>>19423741
Wow.

>> No.19425653
File: 3.01 MB, 497x302, 1635044318575.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19425653

OP, you are either extremely autistic or a masterful troll. This is one of the most amusing threads I've send in this godforsaken place in a long time.

>> No.19425932

>#1.) Life is likely eternal.
>#2.) There may be parallel realities because of the finite nature of the big-bang itself

>4.) The Bible is not true

what sort of new age shit is this

>> No.19426344

>>19407632
>https://pastebin.com/Y2vDggXq
I have no idea why someone would put so much effort into such mediocre bait. If you just had a single sentence thesis statement for each point instead of the rambling paragraphs, you might successfully trick dumb people into thinking they were intelligent thoughts for which you had genius justifications instead of the blathering of a moron trying to troll. But your verbosity removed all doubt.

On the off chance you're serious, this means that you have at least one severe mental disorder, and I encourage you to seek psychological help.

>> No.19426546

>>19426344
I think he's an actual schizophreniac, he used to post the same shit over and over on R9K before staring doing it here on this board