/lit/ - Literature

>>19342375
who is this? does she have a youtube channel?
Is she open to dating 25 year old European NEETs?

>>19342375
Just imagine introducing her to Hegel...

>>19342384
idk I've asked numerous times, no one will tell me

>>19342384
She's Danish and a lesbian. So not unless you're a woman
YWNA btw

>>19342571
but whats the name

>>19342375
why do I want to fuck her tits? It doesnt really make sense to me. I want her to wrap her tits aroound my slightly undersized cock and then shoot my little buddies everywhere but in her pussy. Is there any book that tries to explain such degeneracy?

>>19342375
Nobody never has pointed that out ever

He was into weird sexual counterculture. Wasn't he a nudist or something? I believe he also had gay sex with L. Ron Hubbard, or there are rumors. Probably occult connections somewhere in there as well.

All scifi authors before scifi became commercial kitsch are weird once you press on them. Asimov was a Freemason. Heinlein types abound. "Just" being a countercultural proto-hippie with weird ideas and obsessions is probably the lower threshold for entry. Look up Jack Parsons, Wilhelm Reich, and Fidus. Sexual counterculture is 200 years old, and first exploded into popular culture with Theosophy and related New Age movements, of which the hippies are only a later, commercialised echo.

>>19342635
imagine having gay sex with Hubbard. That must be enlightening

>>19342375

>>19342600
your base instincts are designed for hunting and reproducing in dangerous environments with scarce resources but you also live in a agrarian/semi-post-agrarian society (you also have less powerful instincts designed for operating in these types of societies). at the moment having a child or a relationship with a women would be a economic detriment with no pay-off until you were very old though due to those base instincts you would still like this women as an option in the future.

this is an autistic interpretation that ignores sensuality but i assume this is what you were looking for

>>19342375
It's because back in the days people thought that the only way to move society forward and radically change it was to abandon the idea of bloodshame, since this was seen as the primal foundation of the entire human culture.
His works are still pretty shit though.

>>19342375
There's nothing wrong with being sex-obsessed sweaty

>>19342571
>lesbian
this is a meme for women. unless they are severely mentally ill dikes, they will eventually go to men.

>>19342375
I'M GONNA MAKE IT AND GET A GF OR MULTIPLE GFS TO HAVE 8+ WHITE BABIES ON OUR ESTATE(S) YOU MOTHERFUCKERS

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>19342571
sauce pls

>>19343098
No.
Bisexuals living as homosexuals are a thing, as much as bisexuals living as heterosexuals, but this does not invalidate the existence of homosexuals.
Get over it, dork.

>>19343154
Oh no, you misunderstand. Men can be homosexuals. Not women, unless they are severely mentally ill. Even then I doubt it. However there is also a strong link between mental illness and homosexuality in men.

>>19343154
i want to have a fuck you

>>19343184
No. You misunderstand. You’re flat out wrong.

>>19343184
How do you know?

>>19343206
hey i'd like to have a fuck yu ? anwser>?lplzx adrs>?

>>19343206
...in your opinion. Lesbianism for females is usually a trend, unless there is something seriously wrong with them. Why are lesbian relationships so abusive, particularly as women get older? or have you not looked at the statistics that any underaged /pol/tard would be aware of? haha, that's OK sweetie, lose some weight and fight yourself a good man, no need to concern yourself with these larger issues.

COME ON BUTTERS I WANT TO HAVE FUCKIN SEX WITH YOU IM SO FUCKING HORNY IM JERKING IT TO YOUR FUCKING POSTS PLS HELP ME FUCK FUCK UFCK FUCK UFUKK KBUTTERS WHY CANT I HAVE SEX WITH YOU WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO AHAA

BUTTERS FOR GODS SSAKE AT LEAST LE ME TOUCH YOU

>>19343154
>invalidate

>>19343211
Statistics, observational experience and intuition, in that order. Young women always jump onto the "I'm a lesbian" trend, they grow out of it. There are studies showing this. It's similar with trannies. Incels/weak men decide they want to become "female" either for attention or porn addiction or other sexual pathologies and brainwashing/suggestion/normalization in media. The difference is it is harder to come back from it, hence the high post-operation suicide rate.

BUTTERS I'LL BE A HOMO HETERO BI WHATEVER THE FUCK YOU WANT ME TO PLEASEEEEEEEE

>>19343211
because he's a faggot

>>19343222
In my experience. It isn’t a trend. I do think it might be among the bisexuals, but I’ve no data on it. Don’t really care.
And the abuse meme is also false. You trust statistics from pol? Laughable. Just go back

>>19343245
WHY ARE YOU INGORNNG ME

>>19343098
No. Retarded wishful thinking.

>>19343248
There’s porn boards for this, kid.

>>19343236
>Properly used word triggers me

>>19343245
No, /pol/ is simply an aggregator for all kinds of sources, including studies which will usually be hidden from the mainstream. You are either intentionally being very dishonest, due to the weakness of your argument, or you are stupid. You should be able to understand that the survey was not from /pol/ or conducted by /pol/, the point is that info which would otherwise be buried comes to light there without it being censored.

Your experience is valid, but not as valid as the actual data, showing young women turning away from being dikes as they get older (i.e., it is trendy), unless they get old and start abusing one another (also shown in surveys, lesbian relationships are much more abusive than average straight, white relationships). You also clearly do care, since you are taking things personally and telling somebody to go back to /pol/ because they dare to post something mildly edgy on 4chan.

>>19343256
FINE BUTTER I'LL DO CUM TRIBUTE YOU MADE ME DO THIS

>>19343250
Nope, this is simply a trend revealed by statistics ("le Science"). I don't care one way or the other, the good part is reality usually goes against the views of leftist radicals (why do you think they are so eager to censor content and brainwash children?)

>>19343264
Spill the data then faggot or go back to /pol/
Anybody who “turns away” from homosexuality was bisexual in the first place, so your entire argument is based on a false assumption

>>19343272
Homosexual (Lesbian) women can’t be attracted to men a priori, it goes against the definition of lesbianism. Refer to my post above fucking nigger

>>19343276
I don't browse /pol/ regularly, /lit/ and /biz/ are my main boards. I'm just saying any newfag who has gone through newfag initiation (currently /pol/, before it was /b/) should be aware of this or similar concepts.

I believe all women are bisexual on some level. For men, it is probably different, although they can be broken down through things like pornography and abuse to become gay. Btw, I don't care if people are gay or not, it doesn't really matter to me. However, I would question your mental state if you are a man and you would prefer to return home to a man's asshole instead of a beautiful wife and children. Normalizing such behavior is the sign of a sick society.

>>19343264
/pol/ is the aggregator for alternative facts and /x/ schizobabble - NPC tier “I’ll believe in anything they tell me” delusions, you are the one who has been brainwashed, arguing with you (literal SUBHUMANS, which I truly believe you are) equates to talking to the fucking wall or to an animal, if I could mass shoot you faggots I would (I will)

>>19343284
So you think sexuality is rigid since birth and never changes or doesn't have any variation of degrees? this is very conservative of you. Sexuality can change, all women are naturally bisexual, possibly all men. Different environmental conditions can alter this. Men I am less certain of, since it would seem like there are some men who are indeed 100% gay since birth and never change.

>>19343302
>I believe all women are bisexual on some level. For men, it is probably different, although they can be broken down through things like pornography and abuse to become gay
Nice, what else do you believe in? Santa? Guardian angels? Nobody gives a fuck about your beliefs, they are absolutely irrelevant to the discussion
I believe all men are bisexual because when I (female) stick my fingers in their ass they all love it, also I believe in reincarnation

>>19343327
can you, a female (male), stick your fingers in my ass?

From what I hear, most gays don’t partake in anal sex as much as straight males harp on about. Or not on a regular basis anyway.
Makes sense to me. It’s just like having a turd blocking you up.

>>19343317
>this is very conservative of you
Well I am politically conservative so this is not a “gotcha” moment for me lmao

>>19342375
them tits
soft, nipples hard
on my tongue
my dick - limp
in my hand, my cum
shiny, on her cheeks
making love, under the sheets
climax, pause
taking a shit, where's her bf? don't give a shit
take a shower, round two
finger my ass, in timbuktu
fucking her ass, my nuts
they're empty
her colon? full
my cologne? her smell, intoxicating
like doxing katie
speaking of which, i'm limp again
"shut up b*tch," is what i heard
before my bitch, gags on my head

- anon, from the poetic collection

>>19343331
Yeah if you are a masochist twink biscum faggot
- female (female)

>>19343327
You are a male and a sex addict.

Stop masturbating..

>>19343307
>/pol/ is the aggregator for alternative facts and /x/ schizobabble
No, sources from everywhere are posted. Mainstream corporate/government sources as well as schizo lizard people sources, and everything in between. You have to think for yourself as you're sifting through it, do your own research.
>NPC tier “I’ll believe in anything they tell me” delusions
You are not understanding the NPC meme. NPC's follow the herd, which is the mainstream narrative put out by CNN, The Guardian, BBC, etc., and they believe anything they are told on there because it conforms to/informs the collective mind of the herd. If you are believing anything spouted by David Icke, who is extremely alternative to the point that publicly expressing his opinion will turn you into a social outcast (the opposite of expressing the views of the mainstream), this does not make you an NPC, it just makes you gullible/delusional. This is not the same as being an NPC, you are simply observing some similarities while ignoring the core principle.

How have I been brainwashed? I've explained my points rationally and fairly inoffensively; you're the one freaking out and threatening to kill people because I said something which you find offensive (while ironically calling other people subhumans). You have no self-control and seem to believe that anything that does not conform to your NPC-tier understanding of the world must be schizophrenic/incel/extremist/whatever normalfag label you can think of.

>>19343356
>But /lit/ rejected my message... They hated me because I told them the truth

>>19343334
Only 40% of fags do anal regularly. Otherwise the main activity is fellatio.
One of our friend at school was very, *very* obviously gay, but he himself didn't really know about it, I guess he just didn't care about sex at all at the time. I remember him asking at some point in highschool... "but since we're on the subject... how do gays have sex?" One of my friend tells him they all do anal.
He almost vomited.

>>19343363
>I’m not the NPC! You’re the NPC! >:(

>>19342375
>MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILKMILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK
>MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILKMILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK
>MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILKMILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK
>MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILKMILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK
>MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILKMILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK

>>19343327
My beliefs are backed up by scientific surveys, the idea of reincarnation (which technically is incorrect) pertains to a completely different element of reality which cannot be proven by positivist/materialist science. The fact that you equate the two for rhetorical purposes shows me that you lack an effective means to refute me. Also, you do care on some level, since you are upset and getting bitchy; if you didn't care, you would ignore it or at least not be so upset.

>>19343363
Yeah? You didn’t say anything I found “offensive”. Drop the meme lingo. Go the fuck back to /pol/

>>19343381
So go ahead and link the surveys then like I asked

>>19343381
How do “le science surveys” (which you found on /pol/ and haven’t shown) about relationship abuse prove that all women are inherently bisexual? What is the correlation? Do you realize there is no logical link?