/lit/ - Literature

A thread died for this

>>19296442

Picasso be looking sharp in the breton strip shirt. Seriously, if you want to be taken seriously as a beatnik-artist-bohemian writer you should only wear breton stripe shirts, turtlenecks, oxford-cloth buttondowns, and old beaten up sweatshirts.

>>19296449
You're being the contrary of innovative.

>>19296498
but who makes the best turtlenecks

you also have to be bald apparently

Why?

>>19296606
Because nobody wants to read the same twice.

>>19296606
Innovative = good

>>19296630
There are 7 harry potter books

>>19296632
your wrong

>>19296561
If you just want a cotton turtleneck shirt then uniqlo, but they run small so size up.

>>19296639
My what? I didn’t make that.

>>19296863
It's innovative so it must be good though

>>19296442
False. Writers who don't innovate can still produce quality art using a tradesmanlike approach.

>>19296639
1)how are pork loin, mash and veggies innovative?
2)that looks like a good, well-cooked meal
3)the fact that you can't appreciate something aesuthetically pleasing and mistake that for innovation immediately tells me you're a retarded americuck who subsists solely on fast food and soft drink
4)you're* not your you fucking subhuman piece of garbage

>>19297087
Amazing ability to miss the point.

>>19297091
isn't to get mad at an internet stranger for something and call them a retard always the point?

>>19296639
I see the point of this. I like my food separated as well. But its maybe an tick to separated.
>>19296442
He was really good in his youth, to pity he went into cubism afterwards.

Combinationism is an insatiable human residue and its indulgence will not lead to fulfillment. Techniques develop, evolve and persist because they work - eschew them at your own peril.

>>19297104
>He was really good in his youth, to pity he went into cubism afterwards.

>>19297058
This anon speaks the truth. A man who mastered his craft can produce quality work without innovating one bit. LIke a master painter who learnt his skill for the masters of old and invents no new painting technique.

>>19297147
delacroix

>>19297144
Because I am working since 26 years on my photorealism I am allowed to say that.

>>19297144
>>19297180
I am allowed to say that i hate the optical appearance of cubism.

>>19296442
You're confusing good with great
>>19296639
You are innovatively retarded, what's next calling a burger innovative?

>>19296641
Uniqlo sucks

>>19297144
As well as art nouveau and Baroque. But i have to mention that half the time i like art nouveau.
Thats not the case for cubism or Baroque.

>>19297183
all right, but saying you like the optical appearance of academic paintings is too far

>innovative = good

>>19297200
No i like archetypical academic painting.

>>19297097
Well, you got me there.

>>19296442
Absolutely wrong, and it's one of the most damaging modern misconceptions.

>>19296442
>When there's anything to steal, I steal