[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 859 KB, 1280x823, 55725AD5-98C0-4649-887F-83133E101115.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19294723 No.19294723 [Reply] [Original]

I’ve read technological slavery. It made sense.
I’m also very interested in „pragmatic“ Dharma, meditation technology and have read many books on the topic. As well as hermeticism and the occult, although I haven’t read books about those.
What to read now?
I have seen Evola mentioned here multiple times but everything I can find online about him says he’s a proper fascist. The problem: I see big issues in capitalism that plague our society and, while being anti-authoritarian (at least if that authority isn’t me), side with leftist economic ideas.
I have many friends who are very critical of our system, both left and right wing, but mostly left wing. I would hate to be estranged from them just for some knowledge about an abstract political ideology.

>> No.19294771

>>19294723
Here's your uncle ted:
https://youtu.be/o6mYuNd6uhY?t=509

>> No.19294803

>>19294771
First of all I wouldn’t call him Uncle Ted, as I feel like that implies I know him personally or have any idea what kind of a person he is. All I know about his character is that he was a loner and the fact that he murdered multiple people.

Second of all I don’t know what you want me to notice in that video. He’s talking about his brother, did you think he was gay, are you implying that’s a bad thing?

>> No.19294983

>>19294723
Monkey wrenchin how and why

>> No.19295259

>>19294803
How old are you?

>> No.19295324

>>19294723
Well, Evola (and Guenon) criticize your other "modern" option for the esoteric/occult.
So, your option is to get with Blavatsky and her Theosophy nonsense, that is just Judaic games (numerology, ciphers, and geometry!)
Good luck.

>> No.19295332

>>19294803
eat my ass zoomer

>> No.19295364

>>19294723
>can't write cursive
>expects me to take his advice
no thank you, 'uncle ted'

>> No.19295417

read Ellul
don't go the cliche route of white nationalism, Ted himself wouldn't support that

>> No.19295477

>>19295417
>Ted himself wouldn't support that
OK, technophile.

>> No.19295486

>>19295477
He's right. Ted didn't care about that. His focus was purely technological society.

>> No.19295493

>>19295486
It's more about different roads. The ecofascist white nationalist would be a very effective way to do this. It is in our blood.
Come home, White man.

>> No.19295516

>>19295259
>>19295332
brainlets

>> No.19295540
File: 1.51 MB, 1000x1500, 42A6A5E8-F46E-4BD2-9FBD-B6C305D58F11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19295540

>>19294723
>I’ve read technological slavery. It made sense.
Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How is Ted's greatest work

>> No.19295651

>>19295477
Ted hated white nationalism and nazism you fucking retard.

>> No.19295667

>>19295651
>nazism
lol. Did he hate "nazism" or did he hate "national socialism"? As for "White nationalism", where does he show a disdain for a white ehtnostate?

>> No.19295707

>>19295667
>where does he show a disdain for a white ehtnostate
where in your reading did he show appreciation for any state?

>> No.19295732

>>19295707
>answering my question with a question
I didn't want to, but I expected this. At the end of the day, Ted is a vehicle, he does not want to be a "leader" or even part of some movement. That being said, while I find his commentary agreeable to a point, his thoughts on white nationalism -- and whether or not he approves of it -- holds really no value in the first place on my initial statement. Which was: An ecofascist white nationalist would be a very effective way to do this.
Good night and good luck.

>> No.19295783

>>19295667
ISAIF he literally calls Nazism a kook ideology, and in a letter to an anarchist he said national socialists would be too stupid to even know how to grow their own food.

>> No.19295844

>>19295477
>>19295493
>>19295667
"Nationalism is a great promoter of technology" - Ted Kaczynski, ISAIF

It's not hard to read a book anon. You should probably try it, especially if it's on a subject you plan to discuss.

>> No.19295925

>>19295844
But I have read his works. You're just not understanding where I am coming from, because you see the big no-no words and shut down. It's okay, I expect this kind of thing from this website, it is why I refrain from visiting /pol/.

>> No.19295974

>>19295925
Listen you called that anon a technophile because he said Ted doesn't support white nationalism, and I gave you proof that Ted doesn't support any form of nationalism at all. It has nothing to do with "no-no words" you inbred manchild.

>> No.19296134

>>19294803
>>19295516
He is popularly known as Uncle Ted on this forum. Do you think that people should refer to deceased fascist leader Benito Mussolini as Il Duce? Should strangers refer to each other as Nietzsche bros when discussing a shared interest in a particular 19th century German philosopher who is not their father nor their brother, nor are these fans related in any manner? These fans of Nietzsche do not know each other and are not bound by any formal organization that would give themselves some formal level of accountability and uniformity. They call themselves Nietzsche bros all willy-nilly. Can you believe that?
Such is the behavior of people, especially people on the internet.

>> No.19296327

>>19295925
>I expect this kind of thing from this website, it is why I refrain from visiting /pol/
...are you lost or something?

>> No.19296424

>>19296134
>He is popularly known as Uncle Ted on this forum
I find the name too informal. He deserves something more sophisticated, like Professor Retard, Dog Murderer or maybe King Doomer-Shroomer The Trans Schizo Permavirgin of Supermax

>> No.19296900

>>19296424
>Permavirgin
He's still technically kissed more women than you.