[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 42 KB, 640x511, Holy-Bible.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19271913 No.19271913[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>God is real
You sure bro?

>> No.19271922

>>19271913
Yes

>> No.19271930

>>19271913
I'm having trouble convincing myself that anything is at all, so no

>> No.19271937

>>19271913
>I look around myself
>I see nature
Yes I'm sure god exists

>> No.19271947

>>19271937
God of the Bible is hardly a pantheistic/Spinozan one.

>> No.19271960

>>19271947
I know. Biblical god is Jewish fantasy most likely. Yet I supposed you were asking for "god" in general, not necessarily the Christian god. I assumed you simply posted the bible because it is what most people associate with "God"

>> No.19272015

>>19271913
I'm not more sure about anything else.
I'm more sure God is real than that I am.

>> No.19272106

>>19271913
Yes

>> No.19272180

Goldilocks argument: the way things are is fine tuned to be interesting/complex/beautiful/human centric...

Anthropic refutation of goldilocks: there is a diversity of things, some of them are and some of them aren't interesting/complex/beautiful/human centric... but because we inhabit the part that produced us, we find it interesting/complex/human centric...

Goldilocks within anthropic principle: it is suspicious that there is any diversity in the first place. the way things are seems fine tuned for diversity, so as to contain things that are interesting/complex/beautiful, though maybe not human centric

Anthropic refutation of goldilocks within anthropic principle: we only find diversity interesting/complex/beautiful because things are diverse

>> No.19272212

I can convince myself of 'God', but not of the Old Testament God.

>> No.19272237

I want to know why God's existence is plausible; I want to know why he has the most reason to exist over anything else.

>> No.19272258

>>19271913
No, but what I do know is that it's either God or nihilism. So the price of the infamous wager is nothing.

>> No.19272261

>>19272237
I just believe in the possibility of above human intelligence.
If we find that thing, better get used to calling it God.

>> No.19272265

If "real" is not God, then why would God waste His time being "real" - "real" is stuff rappers and tough gangsters say when they want to justify their violent acts

>> No.19272650
File: 42 KB, 480x640, homer's wager.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19272650

>>19272258
>pascal's wager

>> No.19272655

>>19271913
God is the only thing that is real.

>> No.19272664

>>19271913
Maybe but probably not the one described in that book

>> No.19272806

>>19271913
Yes but not the one described in that book

>> No.19272843

Yes

>> No.19273326

>>19272650
There is no difference between worshipping the wrong god and worshipping no god. If Islam is real and you pick Christianity you are still no worse off than before.

>> No.19273334

>>19271913
yep

>> No.19273339

>>19271913
God what? The idea exists, the meaning exists, God is quantum