/lit/ - Literature

Changed it into a board of mostly shills
Fuck off you stupid kid

>>19136563

>>19136559
It's a testament to no matter how much money you spend, no matter how many ironic shills there are, there is a certain level of unapologetic bad quality where nobody will buy a bad book.

>>19136874
Obviously not true. There are Youtube videos about them. Some of which are critical. The general consensus seems to be that they are really good.

>>19136993
THE YouTube video about it is by you, Lucas. And it’s blatantly a softball ‘crit’ because you want to leech of Gardners meme fame, which is so unbelievably pathetic it makes me want to fucking sob

>>19136993
Maybe in the Gardner household and only when F. Gardner is present

Does anyone know where I could find these masterpieces free online? Asking for a fren

>>19137001
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06d2F7Qe_1M&t=23s

How about all of these videos? This is by a different guy. He loves some of the books nd doesn't like some of the others.

>>19137027
if any anons are for some reason interested in wasting their time reading gardener's dogshit, at least don't also waste your money - it's available for free here:
https://au1lib.org/book/11994656/1ff726
https://pastebin.com/be7ALyVf

>>19137042
Of course people are reading them. Ads have been plastered all over here all year long.

>>19137042
I'm not sure how many hundred-view videos you need about a topic to pretend that it's popular, but I'm pretty sure it's more than three.

>>19137054
>Ignoring my point.

>>19136874
This poster is either a woman or John David Card who is jealous of CotC's success.

>>19137048

>>19137048
thank you for your service anon. I love knowing the fat fuck seethes every time this gets posted

>>19136993
>The general consensus seems to be that they are really good

>>19137048
Piracy is illegal.

>>19137048
Hey thanks a lot, I was just getting ready to buy a copy!

>>19137213
For the people that read them that seems to be the case.

>>19137449
Actually, not even memeing, it upsets me that I read at least the crocodile one. I gave him the benefit of the doubt that he actually tried (and a few bucks obv) and he clearly fucking duped me, so as a reader I’ll say fuck Gardner and his over abundance of commas

>>19137449
Very true. I loved the big reveal.

>>19137485
For me it was all the parallels to The Divine Comedy. It was neat to see the journey like Paradisio Inferno and Pugatorio in a modern and contemporary setting like Chicago.

>>19137504
The part where the dad thinks his family is cooking a crocodile for dinner was peak schizo.

>>19137042
Why are a bunch of sheep sh*ggers suddenly reviewing books?

>>19137485
>>19137504
>>19137569
>damage control samefag
lol what a sad life you must lead

>>19137610

>>19137610
I'm sure your gtmi with your book someday, anon! There's really no need to be jelly. be kind!

>>19137449
I've read it and genuinely don't think it's good. I think the idea is a creative and that's the best merit it has.

>>19137707
I thought the twist was amazing. That seems to be the primary appeal.

>>19137758
If this was true and not just advertising gimmick people would be spoiling it in every thread. Do you even understand how this site works?

>>19137485
>>19137875
Different anon here, what’s the main plot of this book? I tried reading the pdf link that was posted earlier in the thread and I don’t want to waste time reading the whole thing.

>29 replies 12 posters

when will /lit/ just become an unabashed shill board for amazon writers?

>>19136559
I miss the Waldun and Gardner threads :(

bump