[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 185 KB, 391x432, bradstreet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19055142 No.19055142 [Reply] [Original]

>For as what is conceived, is conceived by conception, and what is conceived by conception, as it is conceived, so is in conception; so what is understood, is understood by understanding, and what is understood by understanding, as it is understood, so is in the understanding. What can be more clear than this?
also, basically
>God exists because I say it does
St. Anselm, everybody.

>> No.19055148

>>19055142
never been disproven

>> No.19055160
File: 2.31 MB, 2123x1181, 1628544492321.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19055160

>>19055142
Why is it the jew God and all of the later theological ramifications

>> No.19055166

I never really studied Anselm at any level, at all, but sometimes I get the feeling a truly schizo understanding of his ontological argument is the Final Boss of all thought.

>> No.19055203

I don't get it

>> No.19055271

>>19055148
This. OP is just another filtered brainlet seething as usual.

>> No.19055293

>>19055148
All he proves is that a conception exists. Not that a conception has to be actualized.

>> No.19055315

>>19055142
The ontological argument has never been disproven. Gaytheists can seethe all they want

>> No.19055408

The fact there are people who actually buy the ontological argument saddens me.

>> No.19055424

>>19055142
look at his chad tier jawline.
compare him to the weak sissy boy "intellectuals" of today

>> No.19055430

>>19055293
A conception is the pure actuality.

>> No.19055547

>>19055430
How?

>> No.19055555
File: 32 KB, 679x773, 713ikWy6O7L._AC_SX679_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19055555

>>19055271
>filtered by a circular argument

>> No.19055569

>>19055555
kek and checked

>> No.19055643

>>19055555
Checked

>> No.19055828

>>19055555
>rational axiomatic premisses aren't/can't be tautological
maybe you should just reject logic and reason

>> No.19055848

>>19055547
For as what is conceived, is conceived by conception, and what is conceived by conception, as it is conceived, so is in conception; so what is actualized, is actualized by actualizing, and what is actualized by actualizing, as it is actualized, so is in the actualizing. What can be more clear than this?

>> No.19056676

>>19055848
And where do you draw that conception=actualization? You're just memeing.

>> No.19056687

KEK why do you give a shit about that? Are you 13 or something?

>> No.19056693

>>19055408
https://youtu.be/czPBS4FVi2Q

Pseud

>> No.19056731

>>19056693
cute. what's their of?