/lit/ - Literature

woman are inferior both mentally and physically. i would rather suck the cock of a masculine bro as he uses my mouth as his personal fleshlight than even interact with women. women are also ruining the queer movement.

There is a physiological response to a fertile woman by the majority of homosexuals. The idea that they are not attracted to them at all is nonsense and if that was true would have spelled their genetic end long ago. The rare instances of exclusive homosexuality is the result of single mother all female households where the boy felt bad by arousal and repressed it. Most homosexual males that women have as friends have slept with them. Women perpetuate the myth also because it allows them to cheat without suspicion by hanging out with their "friend that's a gay guy". You're an idiot OP ignorant of fundamental biology and common sense.

>>19038876
Mostly I hate them. Generally inferior. I may just be a bisexual turned prison gay though. I feel attraction towards women a fair amount but I have never been in love with one or wanted to pursue them

I don't see much more than an aesthetic and circumstantial differences between men and women, but of course, I'm a bisexual.

>>19039054
Psychology Chad (Stacy)

Queers seek to emulate women at every turn though. Why would you ask them? The only people I can imagine being able to answer this question are top fags and...nvm, I can't think of anyone else.

>>19039083
/lit/ is mostly used by top gays. The bottoms (women) post on twitter, because they’re narcissistic (like women) and too highly empathetic to do a racism (women again)

>>19038876
Women are generally shallow and boring to me, I’m not bad at talking to them, in fact I’m less socially anxious when talking to women. I just don’t want to. Few women share my interests anyways.
>>19039083
>>19039105
I’m a bottom and I’m just a normally masculine man.

>>19039054
Definitely sounds like this was written by a chick lmao. You're calling me an idiot based on an assumption held by the overwhelming majority; in that case, wouldn't I be merely a victim of cultural osmosis looking to reverse my ignorance? Anywho, can you provide a (non-freudian or psychotic hack crit-theory) elaborating on this?

>>19039105
Do you view female empathy as a negative trait? If so, I'm curious to hear why.

>>19039023
What in particular do women do to shit it up?

>>19039055
What turned you prison-gay? Actual prison?

>>19039165
Do you have a physiological response to "fertile women" (maybe this means ovulating? Or just attractive, not sure what she was getting at) like femanon asserted? This is a really productive place for honesty of this sort.

>>19039176
Fantastic non argument in response and emotional seeth. You might want to get your estrogen levels checked, if anyone's behavior and rhetoric resembled a woman's, it is yours.

I suck cock and take it in the ass and get loads cummed on me and fisted and pissed on and personally I hate women add me on discord fedor a. egede#5881

I jerk off to shotacon and love AGP femboys and have my own server dedicated to my little pony add me on discord Grimalkin#0994

>>19039176
>>19039205
B-but I thought all gay men were pals!

>>19039205
You are ridiculously stupid. If you're not going to provide anything, I'm perfectly happy to shrug it off and just leave off talking to you. There's plenty more interesting and valuable than le epic debate king destroying me electric-boogaloo style.

I feel about women the same way most straight men would feel about an average looking guy. I might be able to point out things I appreciate aesthetically about them, but there's zero titillation.
>>19039054
Bait but it does touch on a point I find interesting so I'll give a charitable (you). A male is more likely to be homosexual the more older brothers he has. Likely, this is an evolutionary advantage because if you're a stone age Ultra Chad your sons are less likely to kill one another due to the obvious fact a portion of them will care less about finding a female mate. Thus, the homo-gene is passed down not by homos themselves, but by men who breed a lot who don't end up with their family's slaughtered out of the gene-pool via succession crisis and mate competition. Incidentally, this chad-blood inherent in all gays is also why I'll be raping (you) if ever I see you.

>>19039186
I think I can tell when girls are attractive, but I don’t really get boners from girls.

>>19039221
I laid out a cogent argument >>19039054
in response to the naive assumptions made in the original post >>19038876, namely your notion that homosexual men are immune to an arousal response to women, which is false as earlier put forth. I proceeded in my post to insult you. This was met with what could be called a meltdown in these two posts of yours >>19039176 >>19039186, which I called out here >>19039205. Finally you insult, not tactfully but in rage, with still no counter to anything >>19039221. The one who is a smoothbrain here is you.

There was one faggot here who I think might have been a nazi but had actually read the basics of Greek theatre. We got on okay but we were both making posts under the influence I'm pretty sure. Idk what the other faggots read.

>>19039254
Unrelated anon here, but I would just like to contribute to this discussion by saying: meds

I'm attracted to both but see men as the only gender capable of feelings and expressing their opinions on a subject. Women are literally grown up children, they're always expecting you to spoil them without bringing anything back to the table. Trust me, I experienced having a "I'm not like the other girls" type e-gf in my teens and as I grew up I just couldn't imagine leading an entire life with an overgrown toddler like her. She was too autistic to fuck other men on the side, but I cheated on her by flirting with guys before breaking up because I was fed up with her shit.

>>19039437
Are you more an Aeschylus or a Sophocles kind of guy?

>>19039464
That guy had the same weird off-beat frantic brain as someone who's just stepped on a beehive. With such a high schizo count on most boards, I just hope anons are taking their antipsychotics — if they don't want to be John Nash but low iq.

>>19039176
Butters, your trip is off

>>19039557
There is no greater insult than accusing me of being that subhuman. I don't even know what to say to you anon.

I like woman and enjoy their company. I enjoy many female writers.
I feel the hate for women in forums such as this is due to the usual combination of low self awareness and sexual frustration common to teenage boys (though boys seem to stay teenagers right into their twenties these days)

>>19039621
Do you think this manifests in gay men as a form of jealousy sometimes? I ask because even among gay folks here, the general opinion seems to be pretty low.

>>19039625
Immature people are immature, and we live in a broadly sexist society where male behavior tends to more acceptable eg:
>men lose their shit at a sports game
Good, healthy, nothing strange about it, go Eagles!
>women lose their shit at a some Kardashian nonsense
This shows what immature children women are, shouldn't be allowed to vote
Gay men are men, and share the same misogyny as straight men, would be weird if they didn't. As the feminists say, it's about power, not sex.

>>19039642
>pressed post too soon
Though of course some gays are jealous of women, but they would be petty jealous people anyway, regardless of whether they suck cock

>>19038876
I used to hate them, but now I'm glad that they (and by extension heterosexuality) exist. There's nothing more satisfying than corrupting a straight man.

>>19039621
>>19039642
>I like woman and enjoy their company. I enjoy many female writers
>we live in a broadly sexist society
Please, just go back. You are the Reddit/Twitter stereotype and an obvious normalfag. You have no business posting here when you could be out gossiping with your female friends.

>>19039543
Aeschylus but he liked Sophocles. Or at least the Theban plays

Take ivermectin for the gay parasites.

>>19039677
>Please, just go back
Despite your insecurity, I WILL post about Jane Austen and Rachel Cusk
I WILL continue to point out that the inability of writers like Mccarthy and Dostoevsky to write female characters is a weakness of their work.
You WILL be unable to stop me
Not your fucking hugbox sweetie bear

This thread is pretty based
As I woman I tend to like other women but they can also be petty fucking bitches who I loathe to deal with. While that could be the minority of women they are a rather loud minority. Same with men who use their sexual insecurities as an excuse to abuse women

>>19039691
Based! You're actually the first guy I've asked who gets it. In the essays on Aeschylus I've read, he's usually depicted as a stodgy old man-conservative compared to Sophocles but I found his work to be full of ardor, existential thoughtfulness. His articulation (in the Oreseia) of eye-for-and-eye ethics to reliance on a middle-man in the form of the law shows a level of reflectiveness that dwarfs the average person even today.

>>19039720
You're based bipolar-tan. Lit has mostly tanked so I've decided to outright refuse to engage in most of the slack-jawed threads and instead, try to create my own productive ones. Its not like there isn't plenty of interesting stuff to discuss — especially in an anonymous environ.

>>19039720
>This thread is pretty based
>As I woman I tend to like other women but they can also be petty fucking bitches who I loathe to deal with. While that could be the minority of women they are a rather loud minority. Same with men who use their sexual insecurities as an excuse to abuse women