[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 18 KB, 739x415, 8EBD6815-DA1A-4886-B651-8365D06F7285.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19029959 No.19029959 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.19029977

Plato.

>> No.19029984

>>19029977
plato wrong. Laozi right.

>> No.19030101
File: 2.71 MB, 2195x2071, 1630847699919.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19030101

>>19029959

>> No.19030107

>>19029984
>laozi
Not philosophy. Unless you think Psalms and Havamal are philosophy.

>> No.19030306
File: 76 KB, 432x648, hazony.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19030306

>>19030107
Yes.

>> No.19030434

>>19030101
Based. Start with Homer.

>> No.19030682

>>19029959
read kant and nothing else, it is literally all unscientific bullshit 99% of which has been proven wrong. Descartes is a good example, the amount of retarded shit he believed about cosmology is astounding.

>> No.19030776

>>19030682
Yikes

>> No.19030784

>>19030776
dilate

>> No.19030801

>>19030101
thats general greekism, not necissarily philosophy. In fact, it m=pretty much stops at Aristotle.

If we are focusing on Phil, keep epic poetry, keep phil trillogy, add oneon romanist stoicism, continue with neoplatonists, early christkeks, then like 1 islamic Aristotelian, then a scholastic, maybe summa theologica, than that french renassance man, (maybe 1-2 humanist renassance stuff), then descarte and the rationalists and empiricists, then kant, then german idealists, then schop and neitzche, then hiedegger and linguistic fuckery man, then deulieze and shit, then shit and shit.

>> No.19030875

>>19030801
No, just read the Greeks and you're better off than reading the memes you listed. There's more philosophy in Aeschylus than in most of the crap you listed.

>> No.19030954

>>19030682
Wrong. You should start with Schopenhauer, as he finishes Kant's meta physics and is far more readable. Read one of Kant's books on morality after if you find that topic interesting as Schopenhauer deviates significantly from that.

>> No.19031061

>>19030954
Not everyone is a brainlet like you are