[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 40 KB, 640x628, 1569522738187.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18747537 No.18747537[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>Art is subjective

>> No.18747547

Your face is subjective.
Subjective to deez nuts.

>> No.18747554
File: 129 KB, 474x1328, chad1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18747554

>morality and general philosophical outlooks are subjective huh? sorry, my perspective is what matters and i will enforce it in my communities as i see fit

>> No.18747564

Beauty is scientifically objective, though. And our brains react to beauty and ugliness in a standard way

>>18747547
Based

>>18747554
Also Based

>> No.18747870

>>18747537
Art is genetic

>> No.18747884
File: 3.50 MB, 2825x1657, artist.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18747884

>>18747537
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ttzijna8mgQ

More people have watched this than the total of all of /lit/'s author's books have been read combined

>> No.18747887

>>18747537
>Art is subjective
For how common it is to hear, this has gotta be one of the most poorly phrased statements I know of.
What people mean when they say it is "aesthetic value is subjective".

>> No.18747902

>>18747887
>aesthetic value is subjective
If that is what they actually mean, they'd still be wrong.

>> No.18747903
File: 341 KB, 1051x1600, spengler.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18747903

>>18747884

>> No.18748064

My subjective take is that art is objective and you are wrong