/lit/ - Literature

>>18666381
>Huxley
kind of yes as he was very well aware of eugenics but was not blackpilled about femal nature.
>Houellebecq
he was kind of black pilled on female nature but as a stereotypical frenchie right out of the 70s he denied genetic determinism and only blamed it on neoliberalism.

I am interested in finding out what will happen in the next century
Will we reach the one government world
Or will there be a push back to a nationalistic society

>>18666399
what about Burgess? he is the least known out of this trio, but in his book The Wanting Seed he created society model, which is, I believe, really closest to reality. This book is really an average read, unfortunately, but an accurate one.

>>18666381
because liberalism and atheism clearly began in 2008

>>18666466

>>18666466
No, but the housing crash did. Hard to get laid when you live with mom and dad because the unregulated jews on wall street tanked the housing market to make a quick buck

>>18666417
no clue but definitely sounds interesting.will check it out.

>>18666381
like all things in life, the elite gets it all, and yes, I'm viewing women in this context as a resource
not that I'm a misogynist or anything, we simply live in a patriarchal society

>>18666381
Saw a female sexologist presented with these numbers.

She interpreted them such that they mean that young men only consider vaginal sex to be sex, and that the 28% are exclusively having anal and oral sex instead, which doesn't count in the phrasing of the question.

The notion that 28% of men aren't getting any at all was not considered - much too implausible in her mind.

Before this goes on and blackpills all of you, you must realize that sex is incredibly gay and overrated.

>>18666381
Women have life on easy mode, there's nothing more to really say. The job market is now totally centered around passivity. All these "working women" are the same personality time: loud, obnoxiously assertive over every detail, conformist, and hyper sensitive. I don't blame men for dropping out of this dull society with no higher virtue than consumption and listening to some burnt out femcel dyke talk about how she's so oppressed in the "safest" period for womyn in human history.

>>18666381
>Muh liberalism/atheism
You're an illiterate retard, just like most of the board
Take your meds and look up the behavioral sink

>>18666653
The modern woman occupies a hypocritical position. On one hand, they talk a lot about sexual liberation, the destruction of gender roles and identity, and the empowerment of women. However all this really translated to was women becoming shock troopers for global, multi-national corporations that produce that "corporate communist public relations" culture. Some of the cruelest people on this planet are female HR reps.

>>18666701
might as well count masturbation as sex

All a woman needs is a decent body and she will more or less get whatever she wants. Furthermore, given the job markets switch into passivity, public relations, and service based economics you won't see many men "making it". This explains the rise in those "wealthy females" the media likes to talk about. The truth is, the job market - much like the sexual market - is totally crushed. Like an old, dying elephant being snapped at by jackals who are bragging that when the elephant finally dies then everyone will have enough to eat. Of course, knowing jackals, they will immediately turn on each other once there's not much meat left to pick off the bones.

>>18666723
>

>>18666714
religion is a mean to combat behavioral sink

belle daphine's rise to power was the summary of the situation of modern females. She had a nice body and was able to make millions off of it. That's all women really need in contemporary society. The last thing I saw with her was a hardcore porn she made showing her getting raped. That sold for a lot of money. If that doesn't summarize how pointless modern society is then you're just forcing yourself to look the other way.

>>18666735
There is no mean
Religion and ideology is all the same, it's just fantasies to try to make sense of a reality you don't understand
If you don't even know basic biology, you know nothing, and you have nothing to say

>>18666749
religion is a mean to control our inner wirings you call biology

>>18666753
No. The reason you jerk off so desperately about your religion is explained by what I already told you to look up. Now do your fucking reading.

>>18666763
>no arguments left
>e-e-e-educate yourself, r-r-r-retard
state of atheist zoomers

>>18666767
Muh religion is not an argument, and so the only response is to reiterate what I already said
And you can fuck off with your troll tactics, they don't hide your illiteracy

>>18666774
>Muh religion is not an argument
for you

>>18666779
Are you all preschoolers?

Anyone remember the "Girls Do Porn" """"controversy""""? Where women had sex for money on camera and then pretended like they didn't know what it was for? Women have life on easy mode.

>>18666794
>Ahh I put dem wommens in dem place not my faul I can't get laid

>>18666794
what is wrong with you anon?
get a hold of yourself

>>18666800
>>18666800
Not him, but I think the guy DO have a point in the GDP issue.

>>18666800
>>18666802
Not him, but I think the guy DO have a point in the GDP issue.

>>18666812
He does not, and you need to check yourself too
I bet he doesn't even know what the controversy was, and I bet you don't either

>>18666794
damn, these girls were fucking retarded

>>18666794
>On January 2, 2020, the women in the trial were awarded $12.775 million in damages—$9.475 million for compensatory damages and $3.3 million in punitive damages. On January 9, Faith Devine was appointed receiver over the business and individual assets of the defendants. Furthermore, the women were given ownership rights to the videos they featured in. The ruling ordered defendants to remove all images and videos from websites under their control, and to take action to remove them from other websites.
>In the injunction, the court ordered GirlsDoPorn to clearly state in bold and centered at the top of the first page of their model agreement that the video was going to be published on GirlsDoPorn.com. The verbal release must also show the model clearly stating the name of the website. Additionally, they were ordered in the future to state in recruitment postings that videos will be posted online, give participants copies of the contracts before arriving, and ensure that participants sign documents indicating that they understand their names or personal information may be used. Later in January 2020, another woman sued the men involved with GirlsDoPorn with a similar case to the 22 previous plaintiffs. In February 2021, the woman was awarded a default judgement of almost $450,000.

>be a dumb whore
>be awarded a lot of money
females never lose, do they?

>>18666815
>He does not, and you need to check yourself too
>I bet he doesn't even know what the controversy was, and I bet you don't either
So enlighten me, oh wise anon.
I sincerely want us to get to gist of the question.

>>18666822
no, fuck you, and fuck your retard mind

>>18666800
>if you make any critique this autotranslates into you not being able to "get laid"
this is more of what i'm talking about. we're conditioned into knee jerk junior high school insults when anyone even tries to venture "why?". nothing is going to get better anytime soon, that's for sure.

>>18666825
>no, fuck you, and fuck your retard mind
Is this bait?
Can't you get into reasoning?
Are you a woman, perchance?
Do you have any arguments about how those girls (or most of them a least) weren't simply whores?

>>18666630
It's the internet retard. People spending their afternoon alone behind an LCD display, instead of mess around with friends.
Combined with wage labor, were most people are stiff drones.

>>18666828
There is no why in this thread.
It's smells awfully like the loser kid's tree house gripe club in here
Honestly, sometimes I think the reason /lit/ went to shit is that most of you haven't finished secondary education these days, but it's the only place you can hide who you really are

>>18666816
Were they though?

>>18666852
The sad reality is that it's mostly adults posting this shit.

>>18666852
>A machine gun of offenses
>No reasoning whatsoever
>He thinks he knows why lit/ "went to shit"

>>18666872
You're just too dumb to know any of the words I use that aren't offensive
Shithead

>>18666871
Just read A Confederacy of Dunces, it turns it all into grand comedy

>>18666862
>Were they though?
>City girls in the information age who don't know that anything recorded in video nowadays has a real possibility of reaching millions.

>>18666873
Sure, sure. Fuck you then, too.

>>18666884
>then
It's the only thing you've been saying all along

>>18666888
You wanna have the last word, huh. What about my dick down your throat?
Stay with this mental image.
I'm gonna jerk to them GDP girls now while you're still here crying.

>>18666888
checked

>>18666852
>It's smells awfully like the loser kid's tree house gripe club in here
In what way? Not a single comment I've seen beyond yours reflects that.

>>18666907
>i'm going to jack off to porn
>checkmate!
Something something "secondary school education" lmao

>>18666862
I think they played the system because women have life on easy mode. They can voluntarily do porn, then sue the creators over it. Incredible. Mix that with the "public relations" regime that has completely engulfed the planet in terms of work and you've got a gradual decay into nothingness.

>>18666923
The thread is a gripe thread about muh libs/atheists, it's only disguised as a question if you have the reading comprehension of a simian, and the post I responded to was simply the sentence "Women have it on easy mode", again "cleverly" disguised as a question
We get you're the same person, with the agenda, and nothing to do except spam your same trite garbage agenda all day evvyyy day, you're not fooling anyone
>>18666907
And tossing you a fuck you just to keep you happy is the least I can do

>>18666714
wow the athefag is seething. Here is something else to make you seethe. The imaginary "good" orc you worship does not exist. There is no evidence of a good orc.

>>18666749
Yeah worshiping orcs is just a fantasy to try to make sense of the foreign invasion you can't do anything to stop

>>18666969
Oh, go diddle a kid already

>>18666767
based, your slaying that libtard with logic fren

>>18666763
>the hyperbolie
>the seething
>reee, plz read my jew propaganda

Why are libtards so fragile?

>>18666969
>>18666974
>>18666980
>>18666986
Spamming responses to old posts isn't going to make anyone take you or your shit thread serious

>>18666800
what do you call this brain leakage?

>>18666994
>>18666986
>>18666980
>>18666974
>>18666969
kek I really made you have a breakdown on here
This is too funny

>>18666969
>>18666974
>>18666980
>>18666986
>>18666994
Here, have some more (you)s
Do you feel better now little loser?

>>18666828
>>if you make any critique this autotranslates into you not being able to "get laid"
>this is more of what i'm talking about. we're conditioned into knee jerk junior high school insults when anyone even tries to venture "why?". nothing is going to get better anytime soon, that's for sure.

no its worse than that anon. Its a sexist slur. They will use it whenever they think a man is getting uppity. Like calling a nigger a nigger when they misbehave in public. That's all it is, is a slur to try and control you. There is no rhyme or reason to it or to the people using it. If there was reasoning to it, faggos would be considered incel since sodomy isn't sex. Once you realize that, you stop caring and you take away the power they try to exert with the phrase. More power to you fren

>>18666975
>Oh, go diddle a kid already

you mean like libtards do?

>>18667019
>>18666994
>>18666986
>>18666980
>>18666974
>>18666969
((They)) will get (you)

>>18667019
I stopped caring about 'incel' from the start, especially when the American media astroturfed it and you had guys on CNN using it. It's like the fall of the Roman Empire ,but a shitty sitcom.

>>18666993
reeing like a little bitch is why no one has ever taken you seriously about anything. Try saying something cool and maybe, we will give you a little respect.

>>18667008
>ree i lost an argument
>NPC response array says "Seethe"

But your the one with hyperbolie and venom so everyone knows your the own freaking out with your libtard fragility

>>18667019
These people really can't be engaged with. Note how whenever there's a problem for any other group, you'll get
>Well, systems of incentives and economics and ideologies are at play! Things are very complicated and require solutions at a structural level!
but then as soon as it's you
>HAHAHAH YOU'RE POOR AND DON'T HAVE SEX LOOOOOOL
this is just the desired outcome of the system, we're beyond arguments now

>>18666969
>>18666974
>>18666980
>>18666986
>>18666994
>>18667019
>>18667026
>>18667037
There we go
You dropped the mask of having anything to do with literature, and that was all I wanted
Go cry somewhere else now

>>18667030
sounds like a threat. Too bad you can't do anything about it yourself, loser

>>18667032
>I stopped caring about 'incel' from the start, especially when the American media astroturfed it and you had guys on CNN using it. It's like the fall of the Roman Empire ,but a shitty sitcom.

based. They make that whole system to remove negative slurs from groups that need negative slurs, such as niggers to make blacks behave, or sluts to make women behave, or faggos to keep perverts in line. But they promote a slur that they only use for men. Its clear their is an sexist and racist agenda here.

>>18667046
>These people really can't be engaged with. Note how whenever there's a problem for any other group, you'll get
>>Well, systems of incentives and economics and ideologies are at play! Things are very complicated and require solutions at a structural level!
>but then as soon as it's you
>>HAHAHAH YOU'RE POOR AND DON'T HAVE SEX LOOOOOOL
>this is just the desired outcome of the system, we're beyond arguments now

When discussion and bargin stop, violence starts. I could totally see a civil war.

>>18667053
>reee
>but I won somehow
>If I don't win I will cut myself, so plz let me win

How come you don't have any pictures to accompany your hyperbolic crying?

>>18667063
I don't really care about using any of those "isms" because they're fake, gay, and forced.

>>18666381
>Spike perfectly correlates with the financial crisis
>Men are assesed on wealth/status

>>18666653
Sex is a resource. And no, we don't live in a patriarcal society since women have power as well.

>>18667352
>we don't live in a patriarcal society
we do, the biggest evidence of this is the fact that women having power is seen as rebelling against the system.

>>18667359
no it isnt

>>18667359
That's not evidence. Look at actual society, women have power over men given to them by sex. Women rule that area and it just so happens to be the engine of civilization. They decide who to fuck (and it doesn't even have to be about money these days since women also work now), they are the gate keepers of human reproduction and sex is always used to get things. They can lie they were raped and destroy a man's reputation forever even if it's all fake. I'm not sure how can a modern man look at modern society and say "Yea, this right here is a patriarcal system."

>>18667399
your arguments are already wrong since your view is rooted in a patriarchal point of view of what is power.

>>18667406
Power is the might to control. It's not exclusive to man.

>>18667417
This is exactly what I'm talking about
I don't blame you, I believe modern societies are inherently patriarchal and there's nothing you can do about it.

>>18667425
I'm not sure I understand your idea. There will always be hierarchies and people will fill the places of power in the hierarchy. This is doesn't mean it's a patriarchal system. A patriarchal system is where men have all the power with exclusivity, which isn't the case in moderm society. We don't live in a patriarchal system. Women having power is not considered "rebellion" anymore, it's the statu quo.

>>18667455
What I'm trying to say is Patriarchal societies are the norm, but even if a society is not patriarchal, deep rooted masculinity prevents any female from gaining actual power
These examples of women in power that people often list as evidence of women having an upper hand in life are women who subscribe to this view of underlying masculinity, either through sexual submission, or becoming hyper aggressive

>>18666381
I would say the numbers are waaay higher than this. 2 things people ALWAYS lie about : sex and money. Add to this that everybody was jailed last year.

In all my male friends from 17 to 28 years old maybe 3 out of 20 are having a sex life in the last couple of years. Meanwhile my 3 female friends are all having wild sex and its not even funny; its disgusting.

Inb4 your friends are losers. Well its amusing because 2 of the 3 that are having some are total failures but they are getting some. The other one is going out with a 38 yo single mom to 3 kids. Its really sad. The rest are all great people with great mind and good spirit but culture does not want normal lads to built normal families.

Shits fucked and pretty eery.

>>18666701
>you must realize that sex is incredibly gay and overrated.
only sex with love

>>18667773
Normal means common or generally accepted, not good

>>18667794
I meant normal in having their shit together. Having a trade that pays well, fairly good socially. But its nothing to write home just normal. Under 6 foot, normal weight, reserved and calm attitude.

>>18667773
Ehh that might just mean your social circle is more virginy than average. But yeah there's so much encouragement today to not get married and to whore around, it's so obviously going to be terrible for this generation.

>>18667857
>just mean your social circle is more virginy than average
I mean I had multiple groups of friend growing up and saying 72% are having sex is off by a lot from what I have seen.

I know my arguments are just anecdotes but still I judge reality with what I experienced. Exemples : I use to hang around with some petty crime youth gang ; not even 30% were having some. I know we were together all day all night from parks to park from bars to club. Childhood friends from 10 to 20 yo: in 8 2 ever had a gf.

The only group of friend I had that would come to 72% were a group of friends (coworkers) 10-12 years older than me. Almost a different generation. Other anecdotes everywhere I worked I see gloomy young males seeming like they are living in their own hell. I dont think they are having some.

My anecdotes are worth what they are worth anon. Probably some have different experience but I tend to believe that the average tend to be like what I experienced. Honestly I do not give a shit. The West is a joke and its dying. Just let it go.

>>18667523
A genuine "not a real female" argument in the wild. It's uncanny how much this sounds like "not real communism" apologetics. You're wedded to your ideology to the point of absurd denial of facts, face the truth.

>women out earn men
>women are more educated than men
>women have more sex than men
>women outlive men
>parents spend an order of magnitude more money on raising their girls compared to their boys
>divorce court

This is not a patriarchal society. You believed the fairy tale that women gaining power would magically fix everything. I'm not denying that some things will get better with women in power, but what about what gets worse? Are you willing to entertain a legitimate criticism or is your belief as fragile as it is shallow? Women are not inferior men, but nor are they superior men. Changing the sex organ on the monkey in charge is such a silly thing to believe matters when modernity has outstripped the individual's capacity to comprehend the effects of madness inducing layers of abstraction. Women are not the problem. Men are not the problem. We're far past that having any relevance at all and drowning in abstraction produced complexity.

>>18666399
>but was not blackpilled about femal nature.
large part of BNW was that all the females where whore because they were brainwashed to be in their culture. Sure men are stated to be the same but we only see the female character be

>>18666849
I try to do things with my friends but they never respond in the groupchat and even when I go out with one of my friends how am I supposed to magically get laid? I go out at least once a weak to get drinks and I've never just randomly met some girl my age who's looking to fuck. I literally haven't talked to a woman my age in like a year.

>>18668702
Phones have destroyed social behaviors by being an attention sink. Man has been entirely reduced to his brain. The eyes, ears, face, arms, legs, etc. have atrophied. These are our instruments and the stage is vacant. We've forgotten the value of nonverbal communication and now we are paying the price of the tyranny of the brain.

>>18667773
>>18667857
I agree with this. Looking at the different groups of people I grew up with and the groups of people I met at college and at internships, I'd say there's two main groups of people. There's the guys who have been dating the same girl since high school or college, and there's the guys who have been chronically single their entire lives, have never really had gfs, and a noninsignificant number have never even had sex. I'm talking guys who are mostly in their early-to-mid 20s now. If you don't happen to be the 30% of guys who accidentally found a girl who wanted to day in school then you're basically shit out of luck. Even the couple guys I know who are "sleep around a lot" and are good with women are mostly just paying hookers or sleeping with desperate fat girls on Tinder. They're definitely not pulling dimes every weekend like some kind of unrealistic boomer movie. I'm a 25 yo virgin and I've basically given up on ever finding a woman who is interested in men. Most women seem to be asexual.

good thread ruined by a bunch of schizos

>>18668805
>incel thread
>good
o i am laffin

I genuinely think the next great revolution will be about men’s access to sex.
Especially consider how white supremacy is being demonized and contorted in America, also consider that the minority male population is growing and minority men are especially sexless as a demographic.
Now what happens when men without families or children or any continuity to the nation-state are told they are oppressed and that whites are the source of their problem.
I shouldn’t even have to mention the demographic issues that will exacerbate the economic problems coming, perhaps there will be a man who will influenced by these in a similar fashion ala the shrinking markets problem of yesteryear.
I think a few years time we’ll start to see sparks fly.

>>18668922
>Especially consider how white supremacy is being demonized and contorted in America, also consider that the minority male population is growing and minority men are especially sexless as a demographic.
mostly correct but there is no correlation between white supremacy and male virginity in fact Asian and Black incels far outnumber White incels according to statistics. also if you want to know what will happen in US soon look no further than Sweden and Germany. men wil be importing Thai and Filipino bitches first before there will be any beta uprising

>>18668922
It will be a truly final solution. There won't be a revolution, there will be vr and robotics. Artificial women will completely annihilate biological women's sexual value. This will be the true liberation of women and then the chips will be on the table to see what other qualities of value they really possess.

>>18668922
Yeah it will be interesting, the popular conscious thinks of incels as nerdy white guys but obese blacks and especially Asians are the largest incel demographics.

>>18668999
This was literally the point of his post you retard learn how to read.

>>18669173
Why don't you fuck of back to pol with your incel club talk? You've been saying nothing but muh women and muh bad modern world this whole thread, like any of you retards ever read a book, much less could form a coherent thought on Huxley, Houllebecq, or Burgess
Go on, tell us about your impression of the last work you read by either of these writers or run off to where you belong

>>18667053
Cope harder. You will never be a woman, faggot

>>18669196
I would estimate that /pol/ posters are the likeliest to be reading shit. Most literary discussion on this board with any real energy is driven by them.

>>18669212
>>18669230
See, neither of you have ever read a book, nor can you form a coherent sentence
Bye bye

>>18669196
>UR NO IN MY SECKRET CLUB READING HUXLEY AND HOULLEBECQ
Are you retarded or something? Everyone I know read Huxley in high school and Houllebecq is almost foisted on you at any airport store. This is an incel bait thread, why are you expecting quality? It's a stupid question anyway and if OP wanted a real answer he'd have written more than 2 lines of broken English posted with the classic incel graph. Also
>pol
It's /pol/ newfag and /r9k/ is the board you're looking for.

>>18668685
women don't become a slut if they manage to get the chad but will resort to cuckoldry if they have no other choice say being married to a betabuxx provider.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXQwtTOnLvg

>>18669314
>SECKRET CLUB
It's not very secret, but it's no surprise you're too stupid to figure out which board you're shitposting on

>>18669422
I only post on one board. I've been here longer than you and I've read more than you. Go back where you came from nigger

>>18669505
Yet you post frogs. Curious.

>>18669572

>>18668702
Go talk to women. In the west it's hard, but it's still possible.
A little easier, do a social activity were many women are, even if you don't give a shit about such activity. Try Yoga classes, german language lessons, even cooking.

>>18669917
I've thought of looking for a French class as I'm trying to brush up on mine and relearn it. Idk though I don't live in a city I live in a suburban beach town so a lot of things like yoga that attract women are just full of old ladies.